{"id":207724,"date":"2019-01-07T18:40:27","date_gmt":"2019-01-07T13:10:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207724"},"modified":"2019-01-09T13:05:47","modified_gmt":"2019-01-09T07:35:47","slug":"plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/","title":{"rendered":"J&K HC | Petition for additional pleas rejected as nothing new pleaded in written statement"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu and Kashmir High Court<\/strong>: A Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of a Subordinate Civil Judge where the application of the petitioner seeking leave of the court to file additional pleas (replica) was cancelled.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are that a suit was filed by the petitioner for Permanent and Mandatory Injunction restraining the respondent from raising any construction illegally and unauthorizedly to the prejudice of the rights of the petitioner which was pending adjudication before the Subordinate Civil Judge. Respondent then filed his written statement in which he clearly refuted the contents of the plaint. The petitioner with a view to file additional pleading moved an application before the trial court for submitting additional pleadings (replica). The trial court did not find any substance in the application and rejected the same. The ground that was given for rejection was that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any new facts which had come in the written statement and which needed to be refuted or explained.<\/p>\n

The Court held that no case was made out for the exercise of the power of superintendence of the Court vested by virtue of Section 104 of the J&K Constitution. The order fell in the realm of discretionary order and unless the discretion was demonstrated to have been exercised with material irregularity, and in ignorance of the settled legal principles it could not be made the subject matter of interference in supervisory jurisdiction. The Petition was thus dismissed. [Abdul Rashid Chalak v. State of J&K, 2018 SCC OnLine J&K 1039<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of a Subordinate Civil <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33101,14201,33100,33102,26684,30796],"class_list":["post-207724","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-legal-principles","tag-permanent-injunction","tag-power-of-superintendence","tag-section-104-jk-constitution","tag-supervisory-jurisdiction","tag-written-statement"],"yoast_head":"\nJ&K HC | Petition for additional pleas rejected as nothing new pleaded in written statement | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&K HC | Petition for additional pleas rejected as nothing new pleaded in written statement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of a Subordinate Civil\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-07T13:10:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-09T07:35:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Petition for additional pleas rejected as nothing new pleaded in written statement | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-07T13:10:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-09T07:35:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&K HC | Petition for additional pleas rejected as nothing new pleaded in written statement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Petition for additional pleas rejected as nothing new pleaded in written statement | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Petition for additional pleas rejected as nothing new pleaded in written statement","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of a Subordinate Civil","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-07T13:10:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-09T07:35:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/","name":"J&K HC | Petition for additional pleas rejected as nothing new pleaded in written statement | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-07T13:10:27+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-09T07:35:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&K HC | Petition for additional pleas rejected as nothing new pleaded in written statement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":245147,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/06\/written-statement\/","url_meta":{"origin":207724,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Addition of a new ground of defence or substituting or altering defence or taking inconsistent pleas in written statement would not be objectionable, while adding, altering or substituting a new cause of action in the plaint may be objectionable","author":"Editor","date":"March 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: Krishna S. Dixit J. set aside the impugned order and allowed the petition. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner has filed the instant suit for declaration and injunction for assailing the order rejecting the application filed under Order VI Rule 17 Section 151\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203048,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/04\/powers-under-order-viii-rule-9-cpc-to-be-exercised-by-the-courts-only-in-cases-of-set-off-counter-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":207724,"position":1},"title":"Powers under Order VIII Rule 9 CPC to be exercised by the courts only in cases of set off\/counter claim","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., partly allowed a writ petition filed against an order passed by the trial court whereby petitioner\u2019s application under Order VIII Rule 9 CPC had been rejected by the trial court. The main issue that arose before the Court was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205686,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/26\/determination-of-age-of-the-suit-property-is-of-no-consequence-in-a-title-suit-praying-for-injunctive-relief-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207724,"position":2},"title":"Determination of age of the suit property is of no consequence in a title suit praying for injunctive relief: Karnataka HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of S.G. Pandit, J. while hearing a petition praying for appointment of Court Commissioner, held that a property dispute seeking injunctive relief does not require determination of age of the suit property. Petitioner, who was plaintiff in a property dispute, filed an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205100,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/14\/court-not-to-interfere-in-writ-jurisdiction-where-civil-proceedings-are-pending-for-the-same-subject-matter\/","url_meta":{"origin":207724,"position":3},"title":"Court not to interfere in writ jurisdiction where civil proceedings are pending for the same subject matter","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 14, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. wherein extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court was invoked. Petitioner had invoked the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of the High Court in order to seek issuance of directions to respondent not to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":225946,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":207724,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali J., quashed and set aside the order of the trial court since the trial court erred in rejecting the petition seeking to implead them as a party to the suit. The present writ petition was filed by the petitioners being aggrieved against the order passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":195994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/12\/maximum-period-of-90-days-to-file-a-written-statement-as-prescribed-under-cpc-is-to-be-extended-only-in-exceptional-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":207724,"position":5},"title":"Maximum period of 90 days to file a written statement as prescribed under CPC is to be extended only in exceptional cases","author":"Saba","date":"May 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Hyderabad High Court: A revision petition filed against the order of the Principal Junior Civil Judge whereby he rejected the I.A filed by the petitioner herein, was allowed by M.S. Ramchandra Rao, J. Brief facts of the case were that the respondent (original plaintiff) filed a writ against the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207724","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207724"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207724\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}