{"id":207719,"date":"2019-01-08T10:30:56","date_gmt":"2019-01-08T05:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207719"},"modified":"2019-01-14T16:09:35","modified_gmt":"2019-01-14T10:39:35","slug":"impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/","title":{"rendered":"Sikk HC | Impleadment of party allowed where necessary to hear him before issuing writ of prohibition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sikkim High Court: <\/strong>The Bench of Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J. allowed an impleadment through the present petition.<\/p>\n

The petitioner in the present case submitted that during the mid-eighties Sikhs in the Indian Army and members of other professionals collected funds and built a Gurudwara at Gurudongmar Lake and placed the Nishan Sahib there and since then it has been open for public to offer prayers for which the Government of Sikkim has always issued permission to the pilgrims.<\/p>\n

It has been stated that \u201cDzumsa\u201d <\/em>with the help and assistance of local administration and more particularly the sub-divisional magistrate removed the holy Guru Granth Sahib Ji, uprooted the Nishan Sahib, dismantled all internal furniture and removed the holy items from the premises of Gurudwara. All of this leads to the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n

The directions sought by the petitioners are the restoration of the Guru Granth Sahib Ji, the Nishan Sahib and direction to fix all internal furniture, next direction was upon the State-respondents to refrain from dismantling Gurudwara, further, a writ of prohibition was also prayed for in the same respect.<\/p>\n

State of Sikkim provided the background of the dispute regarding the construction of the Gurudwara near the Gurudongmar Lake on reserved forest land. \u201cDzumsa\u201d <\/em>opposes the building of the Gurudwara by the Army. Applicant pleads that the applicant is a necessary party, the application is bonafide and the impleadment of the applicant would not change the nature and character of the writ petition and no prejudice would be caused to the petitioner as well as the private respondent.<\/p>\n

Further, petitioner pleaded that the petition had been filed for the purpose of complaining about the gross violation of Article 25 of the Constitution of India by State-respondents regarding illegal acts committed.<\/p>\n

\u201cRule 101 of Sikkim High Court (Practice & Procedure) Rules, 2011 provides that every person likely to be affected in any manner by the result of the petition shall be joined as a respondent thereto and any petition in which a necessary party is not impleaded is liable to be dismissed.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Applicant sought a prayer of prohibition upon the State of Sikkim, not to dismantle the Gurudwara. Any activity if in a reserved forest area would necessarily need the permission and involvement of the Applicant. For the issuance of writ of prohibition, it is necessary to hear the applicant.<\/p>\n

It is necessary to implead the applicant to enable this Court to effectively and completely adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the writ petition. Therefore, application for impleadment of the PCCF-Secretary, Forest Environment & Wildlife Management Department, Government of Sikkim as a respondent was allowed. Array of respondents may be amended accordingly and the applicant permitted to file a counter-affidavit. [Sri Guru Singh Sabha v. State of Sikkim,\u00a02018 SCC OnLine Sikk 241<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 01-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sikkim High Court: The Bench of Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J. allowed an impleadment through the present petition. The petitioner in the present <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31619,25874,33108,33107,33106],"class_list":["post-207719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226-constitution-of-india","tag-impleadment","tag-sikkim-high-court-practice-procedure-rules-2011","tag-state-of-sikkim","tag-writ-of-prohibition"],"yoast_head":"\nSikk HC | Impleadment of party allowed where necessary to hear him before issuing writ of prohibition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sikk HC | Impleadment of party allowed where necessary to hear him before issuing writ of prohibition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sikkim High Court: The Bench of Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J. allowed an impleadment through the present petition. The petitioner in the present\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-08T05:00:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-14T10:39:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/\",\"name\":\"Sikk HC | Impleadment of party allowed where necessary to hear him before issuing writ of prohibition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-08T05:00:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-14T10:39:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sikk HC | Impleadment of party allowed where necessary to hear him before issuing writ of prohibition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sikk HC | Impleadment of party allowed where necessary to hear him before issuing writ of prohibition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sikk HC | Impleadment of party allowed where necessary to hear him before issuing writ of prohibition","og_description":"Sikkim High Court: The Bench of Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J. allowed an impleadment through the present petition. The petitioner in the present","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-08T05:00:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-14T10:39:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/","name":"Sikk HC | Impleadment of party allowed where necessary to hear him before issuing writ of prohibition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-08T05:00:56+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-14T10:39:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/08\/impleadment-of-party-allowed-where-necessary-to-hear-him-before-issuing-writ-of-prohibition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sikk HC | Impleadment of party allowed where necessary to hear him before issuing writ of prohibition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":205546,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/alternate-remedy-under-sikkim-greenfield-airport-act-2018-renders-writ-petition-unsustainable-sikkim-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207719,"position":0},"title":"Alternate remedy under Sikkim Greenfield Airport Act, 2018 renders writ petition unsustainable: Sikkim HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of CJ Vijai Kumar Bist, disposed of a writ petition on carefully observing that an alternative remedy under the Sikkim Greenfield Airport, Pakyong (Settlement of Claims for Loss and Damages) Act, 2018 is available for claiming compensation by filing a claim petition\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":338220,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/31\/power-to-call-records-revise-penalty-order-after-consultation-with-psc-is-on-governor-discretion-sikkim-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207719,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Power to revise penalty after consultation with PSC is on Governor\u2019s discretion\u2019; Sikkim HC upholds order modifying penalty of dismissal from service to compulsory retirement","author":"Editor","date":"December 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Governor\u2019s failure to consult the Commission as envisaged in Rule 10 of Sikkim Government Servants\u2019 (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1985, while passing the order modifying the penalty, alone would not change the nature of the case.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250937,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/08\/sexual-harassment-of-women-at-workplace\/","url_meta":{"origin":207719,"position":2},"title":"Sikk HC | Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace| Open for Executive Authority to decide the scope of the term ‘workplace’","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: The Division Bench of Jitendra Kumar Maheshwari, CJ. and Meenakshi Madan Rai, J., partly allowed an appeal which was filed challenging the Judgment dated 08-12-2020 passed in Silajit Guha vs. Sikkim University, WP(C) No.30 of 2019 by Single Bench, partly dismissing the petition deciding the issue of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203281,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/08\/transferee-can-be-impleaded-in-a-suit-pendente-lite-only-if-they-have-a-substantial-interest-involved\/","url_meta":{"origin":207719,"position":3},"title":"Transferee can be impleaded in a suit pendente lite only if they have a substantial interest involved","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby her application for impleadment as a party, under Order 1 Rule 10(2), CPC was rejected. The main issue that arose before the Court was whether a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281628,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/14\/old-settlers-sikkimese-income-tax-exemption-section-1026aaa-uncostitutional-shah-nagarathna-supreme-court-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207719,"position":4},"title":"They are all Sikkimese! All old settlers entitled to the exemption under Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While MR Shah, J, has struck down the definition of \u201cSikkimese\u201d in Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Nagarathna, J, has called for saving the Explanation to Section 10(26AAA) and has created a stopgap \u2018sub-clause (iv)\u2019 till the Union of India makes the requisite amendment to the provision.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/They-are-all-Sikkimese-All-old-settlers-entitled-to-the-exemption-under-Section-1026AAA-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-Supreme-Court.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":225946,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":207719,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali J., quashed and set aside the order of the trial court since the trial court erred in rejecting the petition seeking to implead them as a party to the suit. The present writ petition was filed by the petitioners being aggrieved against the order passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207719"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207719\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}