{"id":207712,"date":"2019-01-07T13:45:19","date_gmt":"2019-01-07T08:15:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207712"},"modified":"2019-01-14T16:10:46","modified_gmt":"2019-01-14T10:40:46","slug":"further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court:<\/strong> A Bench comprising of K. Abraham Mathew, J. allowed further investigation to the petitioner as the prior investigation was not sufficient.<\/p>\n

The accused was charged for offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. It was stated that he was entrusted with the responsibility for the manufacture of ornaments for which gold was given to him which allegedly was misappropriated by him. The petitioner through his counsels N.M. Madhu, P.P. Harris and C.S. Rajani claimed that he was not satisfied with the investigation and wanted a further investigation into the matter. He has also brought to the Court\u2019s notice that as per the statements of the witnesses on record, the accused sold them gold ornaments for which even attempts were not made by the investigating officer as to their recovery.<\/p>\n

The Court agreed with the petitioner, allowed the writ petition and granted further investigation in the case. [Biju v. State of Kerala,\u00a02018 SCC OnLine Ker 7430<\/b><\/a>, decided on 05-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: A Bench comprising of K. Abraham Mathew, J. allowed further investigation to the petitioner as the prior investigation was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33093,33092,3009],"class_list":["post-207712","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-further-investigation","tag-investigation-officer","tag-recovery"],"yoast_head":"\nKer HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: A Bench comprising of K. Abraham Mathew, J. allowed further investigation to the petitioner as the prior investigation was\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-07T08:15:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-14T10:40:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/07\\\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/07\\\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Ker HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-07T08:15:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-14T10:40:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/07\\\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":175,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Further Investigation\",\"Investigation officer\",\"recovery\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/07\\\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/07\\\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/07\\\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-07T08:15:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-14T10:40:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/07\\\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/07\\\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/01\\\/07\\\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO","og_description":"Kerala High Court: A Bench comprising of K. Abraham Mathew, J. allowed further investigation to the petitioner as the prior investigation was","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-07T08:15:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-14T10:40:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Ker HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO","datePublished":"2019-01-07T08:15:19+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-14T10:40:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/"},"wordCount":175,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Further Investigation","Investigation officer","recovery"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/","name":"Ker HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-07T08:15:19+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-14T10:40:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/further-investigation-ordered-as-prior-investigation-constituted-failed-attempts-by-investigation-officer\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Further investigation ordered as prior investigation not proper by IO"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":215114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/28\/kar-hc-statement-in-presence-of-doctor-to-police-officer-cannot-be-discarded-at-stage-of-investigation-bail-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":207712,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Statement in presence of doctor to police officer cannot be discarded at stage of investigation; bail rejected","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: H.B. Prabhakara Sastry, J. dismissed the petition under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure for an offence punishable under Sections 307, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. The facts of the case were that petitioner and the complainant had a quarrel\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203945,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/18\/matter-pending-investigation-for-12-years-police-directed-not-to-arrest-accused-till-completion-thereof-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207712,"position":1},"title":"Matter pending investigation for 12 years \u2014 Police directed not to arrest accused till completion thereof: Allahabad HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A petition was filed before a Division Bench comprising of Ramesh Sinha and Dinesh Kumar Singh, JJ., for quashing an FIR registered under Sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 201, 218 and 120-B\/34 IPC and 13(2) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/jk-hc-further-investigation-under-section-1738-crpc-allowed-on-ground-that-relevant-evidences-were-left-out\/","url_meta":{"origin":207712,"position":2},"title":"J&K HC | Further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC allowed on ground that relevant evidences were left out","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. allowed this petition seeking a direction to the official respondents for reinvestigation because of shoddy, incomplete and unreasoned investigation conducted in a perfunctory manner. The facts of the case are that the father, brother of the petitioner and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":291079,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/02\/further-investigation-permissible-even-after-acceptance-of-final-report-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207712,"position":3},"title":"Further Investigation permissible even after the final report laid before the Magistrate has been accepted: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court made clear that further investigation cannot be put at par with prosecution and punishment and hence, the principle of double jeopardy would not apply.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"further investigation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/further-investigation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/further-investigation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/further-investigation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/further-investigation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250745,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/05\/national-flag\/","url_meta":{"origin":207712,"position":4},"title":"Gau HC | Is using of National Flag as a table cloth Sedition? HC grants bail to the woman accused of willfully dishonouring the National Flag","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court: Manish Choudhury, J., granted bail to the woman charged with sedition for using National Flag as a table cloth. The petitioner, Ms Rajina Parbin Sultana was booked under Sections 120B\/124A IPC and Section 2 of the Prevention of Insult to National Honour Act, 1971 and had been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":267634,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/31\/order-by-trial-court-violative-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":207712,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Order by Trial Court violative of principles of natural justice; IO to be given opportunity to be heard","author":"Editor","date":"May 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Atul Sreedharan, J. allowed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order where after deciding a criminal case, the Additional Sessions Judge passed an order asking the Superintendent of Police to take action against the petitioner, who was the Investigating Officer of the case. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207712","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207712"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207712\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207712"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207712"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207712"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}