{"id":207645,"date":"2019-01-05T13:45:14","date_gmt":"2019-01-05T08:15:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207645"},"modified":"2019-02-02T10:10:19","modified_gmt":"2019-02-02T04:40:19","slug":"nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT | NCLT not required to suo motu go through all issues pleaded but not addressed in application under Companies Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0<\/strong>A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru disposing of an application filed by the appellant.<\/p>\n

The appellant had filed an application under Sections 393, 398, 402 and 406 of Companies Act, 1956 alleging oppression and mismanagement against the respondent company. The application was disposed by NCLT by the impugned order.<\/p>\n

Kumar Sudeep and Prasanna S., Advocate appearing for the appellant submitted that he had raised more than 10 issues but only one issue relating to valuation was addressed by NCLT and rest were neither discussed nor decided.<\/p>\n

The Appellate Tribunal noted that on a bare perusal of the impugned order it appeared that the appellant raised only one issue before NCLT which was decided. It was observed,\u00a0“There may be many issues pleaded before the Tribunal but the Tribunal is not required to\u00a0<\/strong>suo-motu go through all the issues if during the hearing the parties do not address rest of the issues.”\u00a0<\/b>The Appellate Tribunal was of the view that the appellant may bring the matter to the notice of NCLT by filing a review petition along with certificate of the arguing counsel that he had argued on the other issues. [B. Govinda Ramesh v. Vinyasa Engg. (P) Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine NCLAT 4<\/b><\/a>, dated 03-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[33074,4841,21264],"class_list":["post-207645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-oppression-and-mismanagement","tag-review-petition","tag-suo-motu"],"yoast_head":"\nNCLAT | NCLT not required to suo motu go through all issues pleaded but not addressed in application under Companies Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT | NCLT not required to suo motu go through all issues pleaded but not addressed in application under Companies Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-05T08:15:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-02T04:40:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT | NCLT not required to suo motu go through all issues pleaded but not addressed in application under Companies Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-05T08:15:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-02T04:40:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT | NCLT not required to suo motu go through all issues pleaded but not addressed in application under Companies Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT | NCLT not required to suo motu go through all issues pleaded but not addressed in application under Companies Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT | NCLT not required to suo motu go through all issues pleaded but not addressed in application under Companies Act","og_description":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-05T08:15:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-02T04:40:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/","name":"NCLAT | NCLT not required to suo motu go through all issues pleaded but not addressed in application under Companies Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2019-01-05T08:15:14+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-02T04:40:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/nclt-not-required-to-suo-motu-go-through-all-issues-pleaded-but-not-addressed-in-application-under-companies-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT | NCLT not required to suo motu go through all issues pleaded but not addressed in application under Companies Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":50541,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/04\/national-company-law-tribunal-constituted-new-perspectives-for-dispute-resolution\/","url_meta":{"origin":207645,"position":0},"title":"National Company Law Tribunal Constituted \u2013 New Perspectives for Dispute Resolution","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 4, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) vide a notification dated 1 June 2016 has constituted the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and its appellate authority, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) with effect from such date. The principal bench of the NCLT is to be located at New Delhi,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267315,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/24\/nclt-non-member-director-approach-oppression-mismanagement-bar-section-430-companies-act-supreme-court-judgments-india-legal-updates-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207645,"position":1},"title":"SC to decide if a non-member director barred from approaching NCLT alleging oppression\/mismanagement under Section 430 of Companies Act","author":"Editor","date":"May 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Dinesh Maheshwari and Aniruddha Bose, JJ., issued notice to Topworth Urja & Metals Ltd. in a case alleging oppression and mismanagement in appointment of additional directors. The question of law before the Court was whether a non-member\/non-shareholder director is barred from raising a dispute\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Supreme-Court-to-decide-if-a-non-member-director-barred-from-approaching-NCLT-alleging-oppressionmismanagement-under-Section-430-of-Companies-Act.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Supreme-Court-to-decide-if-a-non-member-director-barred-from-approaching-NCLT-alleging-oppressionmismanagement-under-Section-430-of-Companies-Act.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Supreme-Court-to-decide-if-a-non-member-director-barred-from-approaching-NCLT-alleging-oppressionmismanagement-under-Section-430-of-Companies-Act.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Supreme-Court-to-decide-if-a-non-member-director-barred-from-approaching-NCLT-alleging-oppressionmismanagement-under-Section-430-of-Companies-Act.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/Supreme-Court-to-decide-if-a-non-member-director-barred-from-approaching-NCLT-alleging-oppressionmismanagement-under-Section-430-of-Companies-Act.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203934,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/18\/nclt-not-to-entertain-application-under-section-9-ib-code-before-expiry-of-10-days-from-date-of-giving-notice-under-section-81-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":207645,"position":2},"title":"NCLT not to entertain application under Section 9 I&B Code before expiry of 10 days from date of giving notice under Section 8(1): NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) allowed an appeal filed against an order of National Company Law Tribunal (Mumbai). The respondent preferred an application under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219804,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/21\/nclat-nclt-new-delhi-in-terms-of-s-601-ibc-held-to-have-jurisdiction-in-s-7-application-against-corporate-debtor-having-properties-in-up\/","url_meta":{"origin":207645,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT | NCLT, New Delhi in terms of S. 60(1) IBC, held to have jurisdiction in S. 7 application against Corporate Debtor having properties in UP","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson); Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Kanthi Narahari, Member (Technical) dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant-Director of Corporate Debtor against the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (New Delhi) whereby it had admitted the application filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207643,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":207645,"position":4},"title":"Application under Section 9 of I&B Code not maintainable where ‘dispute’ existed prior to filing petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru dismissing appellant's application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200535,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/23\/disputed-question-of-facts-cannot-be-determined-by-nclt-application-under-section-9-ib-code-rejected-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":207645,"position":5},"title":"Disputed question of facts cannot be determined by NCLT; application under Section 9 I&B Code rejected: NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad whereby appellant\u2019s application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was dismissed.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207645"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207645\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}