{"id":207643,"date":"2019-01-05T10:00:56","date_gmt":"2019-01-05T04:30:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207643"},"modified":"2019-01-16T15:21:49","modified_gmt":"2019-01-16T09:51:49","slug":"application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Application under Section 9 of I&B Code not maintainable where ‘dispute’ existed prior to filing petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): <\/strong>A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru dismissing appellant’s application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.<\/p>\n

The appellant had filed a petition under Section 433(e), 434(1) and 439 of Companies Act, 1956 before the Karnataka High Court. The petition was transferred pursuant to rule 5of the Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016 to NCLT. The petition was treated as an application under Section 9 of the I&B Code by the appellant. Demand Notice under Section 8(1) was issued. After hearing the parties, NCLT dismissed the application on the ground of pre-existing dispute. Aggrieved thereby, the present appeal was filed.<\/p>\n

Raghavendra M. Bajaj, Advocate for the appellant submitted that the Corporate Debtor had agreed to pay dues by 5 different times. But the Corporate Debtor claimed the existence of ‘dispute’. It raised objections regarding non-completion of project within time and completion of the same in haste with defects.<\/p>\n

The Appellate Tribunal noted that the objections were raised by the Corporate Debtor much prior to the filing of petition under Companies Act. It was held that such disputes cannot be decided by NCLT but only by a civil court of competent jurisdiction on basis evidence. Therefore, as there existed a dispute raised prior to filing of petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act, it was held that the application under Section 9 of I&B Code was not maintainable. [Yash Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Base Corpn. Ltd.,\u00a02019 SCC OnLine NCLAT 1<\/b><\/a>, dated 03-01-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[10551,32403,30596,33073,33071,33072],"class_list":["post-207643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-civil-court","tag-competent-jurisdiction","tag-corporate-debtor","tag-pre-existing-dispute","tag-section-9-of-ib-code","tag-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act"],"yoast_head":"\nApplication under Section 9 of I&B Code not maintainable where 'dispute' existed prior to filing petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Application under Section 9 of I&B Code not maintainable where 'dispute' existed prior to filing petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-05T04:30:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-16T09:51:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/\",\"name\":\"Application under Section 9 of I&B Code not maintainable where 'dispute' existed prior to filing petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-05T04:30:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-16T09:51:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Application under Section 9 of I&B Code not maintainable where ‘dispute’ existed prior to filing petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Application under Section 9 of I&B Code not maintainable where 'dispute' existed prior to filing petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Application under Section 9 of I&B Code not maintainable where 'dispute' existed prior to filing petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act","og_description":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) dismissed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-05T04:30:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-16T09:51:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/","name":"Application under Section 9 of I&B Code not maintainable where 'dispute' existed prior to filing petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2019-01-05T04:30:56+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-16T09:51:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/05\/application-under-section-9-of-ib-code-not-maintainable-where-dispute-existed-prior-to-filing-petition-under-sections-433eand-4341-of-companies-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Application under Section 9 of I&B Code not maintainable where ‘dispute’ existed prior to filing petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(1) of Companies Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":203934,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/18\/nclt-not-to-entertain-application-under-section-9-ib-code-before-expiry-of-10-days-from-date-of-giving-notice-under-section-81-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":207643,"position":0},"title":"NCLT not to entertain application under Section 9 I&B Code before expiry of 10 days from date of giving notice under Section 8(1): NCLAT","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A two-member bench comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial) allowed an appeal filed against an order of National Company Law Tribunal (Mumbai). The respondent preferred an application under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199240,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/30\/petition-under-sections-433e-and-434a-of-companies-act-admitted-on-failure-of-any-bona-fide-ground-for-non-payment-of-dues\/","url_meta":{"origin":207643,"position":1},"title":"Petition under Sections 433(e) and 434(a) of Companies Act admitted on failure of any bona fide ground for non-payment of dues","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Jayant Nath, J., admitted a petition filed for winding up of respondent company. The petition was filed under Section 433(e) and 434(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner company had business dealings with the respondent company. The respondent was indebted\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":239466,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/21\/winding-up-v-the-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016\/","url_meta":{"origin":207643,"position":2},"title":"Winding Up v. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Amir Arsiwala* & Ishan J Ravindranath**","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/company-law.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/company-law.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/company-law.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/company-law.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/company-law.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":93141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/16\/the-companies-transfer-of-pending-proceedings-rules-2016-notified\/","url_meta":{"origin":207643,"position":3},"title":"The Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016, notified","author":"Saba","date":"December 16, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"G.S.R 1119(E).\u2014 In exercise of the powers conferred under sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) read with sub-section (1) of Section 239 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,\u00a02016\u00a0(31 of\u00a02016) (hereinafter referred to as the Code), the Central Government hereby makes the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206816,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/14\/provisions-of-ib-code-must-prevail-over-section-434-of-companies-act-if-there-is-any-inconsistency-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207643,"position":4},"title":"Provisions of I&B Code must prevail over Section 434 of Companies Act if there is any inconsistency: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 14, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of R.F. Nariman and M.R. Shah, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the order of Rajasthan High Court whereby it refused to transfer winding up proceedings pending before it to National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The account of Jaipur Metals and Electrical Ltd. had become\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263326,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/09\/if-an-advertisement-for-petition-filed-under-s-433-of-companies-act-1956-is-not-published-will-entire-matter-be-transferred-to-nclt\/","url_meta":{"origin":207643,"position":5},"title":"If an advertisement for petition filed under S. 433 of Companies Act, 1956 is not published, will entire matter be transferred to NCLT? Meghalaya HC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: Sanjib Banerjee, CJ, addressed a petition wherein a creditor\u2019s winding-up petition was instituted under Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the same was not yet advertised. Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956 Circumstances in which company may be wound up by Court. A company\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207643"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207643\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}