{"id":207587,"date":"2019-01-04T11:15:10","date_gmt":"2019-01-04T05:45:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207587"},"modified":"2019-01-14T16:16:50","modified_gmt":"2019-01-14T10:46:50","slug":"day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Day on which money was transferred to be excluded while computing period of limitation for filing recovery proceedings"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a petition against the order of District and Sessions Judge, Rohin Courts whereby he has dismissed petitioner’s application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was the defendant in a suit for recovery filed by the respondent. The respondent had transferred Rs 5,00,000 in the account of petitioner on 16-3-2015. The petitioner filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 for rejection of plaint on the ground that the suit being filed on 16-03-2018 was beyond the period limitation of 3 years prescribed under Article 19 of the Schedule to Limitation Act, 1963 and thus barred in law.<\/p>\n

The High Court held the petition to be without merit. It referred to Section 12(1) of the Act which makes amply clear that in computing period of limitation for any suit\/appeal\/application, the date from which such period is to reckoned shall be excluded. In the present case, the amount was transferred on 16-03-2015 which day was to be excluded while computing the period of limitation. After so excluding, the suit was within 3 years and hence was well within time. Therefore, the petition was dismissed. [Brijesh Yadav v. Bijender Kumar Kaushik,\u00a02018 SCC OnLine Del 13225<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 19-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a petition against the order of District and Sessions Judge, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24144,31554,32711],"class_list":["post-207587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-limitation-act","tag-order-7-rule-11-cpc","tag-recovery-proceedings"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | Day on which money was transferred to be excluded while computing period of limitation for filing recovery proceedings | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Day on which money was transferred to be excluded while computing period of limitation for filing recovery proceedings\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a petition against the order of District and Sessions Judge,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-04T05:45:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-14T10:46:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Day on which money was transferred to be excluded while computing period of limitation for filing recovery proceedings | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-04T05:45:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-14T10:46:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Day on which money was transferred to be excluded while computing period of limitation for filing recovery proceedings\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Day on which money was transferred to be excluded while computing period of limitation for filing recovery proceedings | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Day on which money was transferred to be excluded while computing period of limitation for filing recovery proceedings","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a petition against the order of District and Sessions Judge,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-04T05:45:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-14T10:46:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/","name":"Del HC | Day on which money was transferred to be excluded while computing period of limitation for filing recovery proceedings | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-04T05:45:10+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-14T10:46:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Day on which money was transferred to be excluded while computing period of limitation for filing recovery proceedings"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":317658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/18\/delhi-high-court-upholds-trial-court-order-dismissing-order7-rule11-application-due-procedural-considerations-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207587,"position":0},"title":"Issue of limitation cannot be decided without recording of evidence, once it becomes a mixed question of law and fact: Delhi High Court upholds Trial Court\u2019s dismissal of Order 7 Rule 11","author":"Arunima","date":"March 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court held that the dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was warranted, emphasizing the need to focus solely on the allegations in the plaint at the preliminary stage because the issues regarding limitation and adverse possession required further evidence and examination, which could\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":156734,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/15\/while-computing-the-period-of-limitation-period-of-notice-has-to-be-excluded-provided-it-is-issued-within-limitation-period\/","url_meta":{"origin":207587,"position":1},"title":"While computing the period of limitation, period of notice has to be excluded provided it is issued within limitation period","author":"Saba","date":"September 15, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While delivering the judgment in an appeal filed under S. 96 of CPC against the order of the Civil Judge, a two Judge Bench comprising of Jayant Patel, J. and B.A. Patil, J. set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the lower Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":323230,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/30\/allahabad-hc-clarifies-law-period-of-limitation-election-petition-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207587,"position":2},"title":"\u201cWithin 30 days\u2019\u2019 starts from date when result is announced by returning officer: Allahabad HC clarifies law related to limitation for election petition","author":"Editor","date":"May 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cElection law should be interpreted strictly, particularly, with regard to the prescribed period of limitation for the purposes of entertaining the election petition inasmuch as there is no provision qua applicability of the Limitation Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334773,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/09\/cause-of-action-subsequent-arbitration-application-arbitrator-appointment-cannot-be-rejected-on-multiplicity-alone-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207587,"position":3},"title":"Application for arbitrator\u2019s appointment cannot be rejected on multiplicity alone if cause of action for subsequent arbitration arises: SC","author":"Editor","date":"November 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile applying the principles of Order 23 Rule 1 of CPC to applications under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, it must be kept in mind that it will act as a bar to only those applications which are filed subsequent to the withdrawal of a previous\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"arbitrator appointment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arbitrator-appointment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arbitrator-appointment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arbitrator-appointment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/arbitrator-appointment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375099,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/07\/theres-distinction-between-claim-to-be-made-and-petition-under-section-11-of-arbitration-act-to-be-filed-ph-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207587,"position":4},"title":"Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 | Time-Barred Claim \u2260 Time-Barred Section 11 Petition: Punjab and Haryana High Court appoints Second Arbitrator","author":"Shriya Singh","date":"February 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe issue with regard to the time barred claim is not to be gone into at the reference stage under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 but can be seen only by the Arbitrator\/Arbitration Tribunal at the relevant stage.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"claim to be made and petition under Section 11 Arbitration Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/claim-to-be-made-and-petition-under-Section-11-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/claim-to-be-made-and-petition-under-Section-11-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/claim-to-be-made-and-petition-under-Section-11-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/claim-to-be-made-and-petition-under-Section-11-Arbitration-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311779,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/ordinary-suit-cannot-be-transferred-to-commercial-court-by-district-and-sessions-judge-u-s-24-of-cpc-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207587,"position":5},"title":"Power to transfer ordinary suit to Commercial Court is not available to District and Sessions Judge u\/s 24 of CPC: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere the plaint is returned under Order VII Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, on its presentation before the appropriate Court of jurisdiction, the suit will be treated as a fresh suit, and will have to start de novo, and all proceedings before the earlier Court will be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207587\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}