{"id":207536,"date":"2019-01-03T13:00:33","date_gmt":"2019-01-03T07:30:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207536"},"modified":"2019-01-04T10:41:34","modified_gmt":"2019-01-04T05:11:34","slug":"legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/","title":{"rendered":"Legal representatives of judgment-debtor liable to satisfy decree passed against him in terms of Section 50 CPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of C.V. Bhadang, J. held that the petitioners in the present writ petition was liable to pay the amount decreed against the judgment-debtor who was since deceased.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioners were legal representatives Eric Sequeira. He was Chairman of the petitioner company and a judgment debtor died after the decree was passed. Now the decree-holder sought to execute the decree against the petitioners. The Executing Court held that the since petitioners succeeded to assess left behind by Eric Sequeira, they are liable to satisfy the decree. C.A. Ferreira, Advocate for the petitioners contended that legal representatives could not be held responsible to satisfy the decree. On the other hand, Yogesh V. Nadkarni, Advocate for respondents supported the impugned order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On hearing the parties, the High Court found no case to interfere in the impugned order. It was of the opinion that the Executing Court was right in holding that the petitioners were liable to satisfy the decree by which the Company and Eric Sequeira were jointly and severally held liable today the amount of decree. The Execution Court was directed to proceed having regard to the terms of Section 50 CPC. The petition was dismissed. [Goan Residential Resorts (P) Ltd. v. Raghbir Singh Panwar,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/tE05rCou\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Bom 5756<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 30-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of C.V. Bhadang, J. held that the petitioners in the present writ petition was liable <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2713,14211,33051,14231],"class_list":["post-207536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-decree","tag-judgment-debtor","tag-legal-representatives","tag-section-50-cpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Legal representatives of judgment-debtor liable to satisfy decree passed against him in terms of Section 50 CPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Legal representatives of judgment-debtor liable to satisfy decree passed against him in terms of Section 50 CPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of C.V. Bhadang, J. held that the petitioners in the present writ petition was liable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-03T07:30:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-04T05:11:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/goabombayhighcourt1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/\",\"name\":\"Legal representatives of judgment-debtor liable to satisfy decree passed against him in terms of Section 50 CPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-03T07:30:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-04T05:11:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Legal representatives of judgment-debtor liable to satisfy decree passed against him in terms of Section 50 CPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Legal representatives of judgment-debtor liable to satisfy decree passed against him in terms of Section 50 CPC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Legal representatives of judgment-debtor liable to satisfy decree passed against him in terms of Section 50 CPC","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of C.V. Bhadang, J. held that the petitioners in the present writ petition was liable","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-03T07:30:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-04T05:11:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":768,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/goabombayhighcourt1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/","name":"Legal representatives of judgment-debtor liable to satisfy decree passed against him in terms of Section 50 CPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-03T07:30:33+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-04T05:11:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/03\/legal-representatives-of-judgment-debtor-liable-to-satisfy-decree-passed-against-him-in-terms-of-section-50-cpc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Legal representatives of judgment-debtor liable to satisfy decree passed against him in terms of Section 50 CPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":108401,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/21\/section-50-cpc-permits-the-execution-of-decree-of-permanent-injunction-against-the-legal-heirs-of-judgment-debtor\/","url_meta":{"origin":207536,"position":0},"title":"Section 50 CPC permits the execution of decree of permanent injunction against the legal heirs of judgment debtor","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 21, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the matter relating to the executability of decree for permanent injunction against the legal representatives of judgment-debtor, the Bench of Arun Mishra and Amitava Roy, JJ said that normally personal action dies with person but this principle has application to limited kinds of causes of actions and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-depositing-award-amount-with-notice-decree-holder-sufficient-discharge-judgment-debtor-onus-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207536,"position":1},"title":"Depositing award amount for withdrawal with due notice to the decree holder is sufficient to discharge onus on the judgment debtor: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe decree holder was not required to await the outcome of the objections filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, however, if it did choose to remain under a self-imposed embargo, then it can\u2019t demand interest.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257588,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/23\/determination-of-attachment-and-sale-of-life-insurance-policy-for-execution-of-decree-against-judgment-debtor\/","url_meta":{"origin":207536,"position":2},"title":"Determination of Attachment and Sale of Life Insurance Policy for Execution of Decree against Judgment-Debtor","author":"Editor","date":"November 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Love Kumar Gupta*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-117.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-117.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-117.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-117.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-117.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290178,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/delhi-high-court-states-that-conclusive-foreign-judgment-would-be-enforceable-in-india-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":207536,"position":3},"title":"Conclusive foreign judgment would be enforceable in India: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that the judgement passed by the High Court of England was conclusive and would not fall within the exceptions carved out in Section 13 of CPC and was thus, found to be duly executable in India","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370055,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/17\/sc-separate-suit-auction-sale-transferee-pendente-lite-bar-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":207536,"position":4},"title":"Separate Suit challenging auction sale by Transferee Pendente Lite not maintainable: Supreme Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA transferee pendente lite takes the property subject to the outcome of the proceedings, irrespective of notice or bona fides.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Separate suit challenging court auction","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Separate-suit-challenging-court-auction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Separate-suit-challenging-court-auction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Separate-suit-challenging-court-auction.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Separate-suit-challenging-court-auction.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":342100,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/23\/when-sc-held-repayment-of-original-debtors-debts-by-his-legal-heirs-as-good-consideration-in-agreement-b-w-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":207536,"position":5},"title":"NRJ Series| When SC held repayment of original debtor\u2019s debts by his legal heirs as a good consideration in agreement between parties [(1954) 2 SCC 847]","author":"Arushi","date":"February 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment on consideration, dating back to the year 1954.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"consideration","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-_49_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-_49_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-_49_.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/shared-image-_49_.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207536"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207536\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}