{"id":207473,"date":"2019-01-01T13:37:34","date_gmt":"2019-01-01T08:07:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207473"},"modified":"2019-01-02T15:44:10","modified_gmt":"2019-01-02T10:14:10","slug":"offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Offence under Section 135 of Electricity Act not a dispute private in nature; quashing of FIR would be misplaced sympathy: Delhi HC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. declined to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR registered against the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was facing criminal prosecution under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The petitioner who was represented by V.K. Sharma, Advocate sought quashing of FIR on the basis of payment of Rs 1,60,000 to the power distribution company. The prime contention was that the dispute being of civil liability, therefore the ruling of Supreme Court in Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of Gujarat,\u00a0<\/em>(2017) 9 SCC 641<\/a> would not apply.<\/p>\n

The High Court reproduced the relevant portion of board principles governing the exercise of extraordinary power and jurisdiction of the Court under Section 482 CrPC as observed in Parbatbhai case<\/em>. As far as the present case concerned, the Court observed that\u00a0“Theft of electrical energy is menace\u00a0which the society suffers at great cost to itself and to the State. It is a serious offence which affects the financial and economic well being of the State having implications which lie beyond the domain of a mere dispute between private disputants”.\u00a0<\/strong>Opining that such offence cannot be termed to be private in nature, the Court held that exercising jurisdiction under Section 482, in this case, would be a misplaced sympathy. Consequently, the application was dismissed. [Mukesh Chand v. State (NCT of Delhi),\u00a02018 SCC OnLine Del 13031<\/b><\/a>, dated 10-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. declined to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash an <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3067,33033,11791],"class_list":["post-207473","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-FIR","tag-section-135-electricity-act","tag-section-438-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nOffence under Section 135 of Electricity Act not a dispute private in nature; quashing of FIR would be misplaced sympathy: Delhi HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Offence under Section 135 of Electricity Act not a dispute private in nature; quashing of FIR would be misplaced sympathy: Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. declined to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash an\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-01-01T08:07:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-02T10:14:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Offence under Section 135 of Electricity Act not a dispute private in nature; quashing of FIR would be misplaced sympathy: Delhi HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-01-01T08:07:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-02T10:14:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Offence under Section 135 of Electricity Act not a dispute private in nature; quashing of FIR would be misplaced sympathy: Delhi HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Offence under Section 135 of Electricity Act not a dispute private in nature; quashing of FIR would be misplaced sympathy: Delhi HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Offence under Section 135 of Electricity Act not a dispute private in nature; quashing of FIR would be misplaced sympathy: Delhi HC","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. declined to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash an","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-01-01T08:07:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-02T10:14:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/","name":"Offence under Section 135 of Electricity Act not a dispute private in nature; quashing of FIR would be misplaced sympathy: Delhi HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-01-01T08:07:34+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-02T10:14:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Offence under Section 135 of Electricity Act not a dispute private in nature; quashing of FIR would be misplaced sympathy: Delhi HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":335970,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/26\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-marriage-settlement-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207473,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement","author":"Arunima","date":"November 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In cases involving Section 376 IPC or the POCSO Act, Courts must exercise caution while quashing FIRs, as these offences impact societal interests. However, Delhi High Court acknowledged the unique circumstances where the petitioner and the prosecutrix, now married with children, had reached a settlement, balancing societal concerns with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":190034,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/17\/powers-s-482-crpc-no-limits\/","url_meta":{"origin":207473,"position":1},"title":"Powers under S. 482 CrPC have no limits","author":"Saba","date":"February 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J., decided a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, wherein the proceedings against the petitioner were quashed in light of compromise between the parties. The petitioner was involved in a road accident in pursuance of which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/20\/offences-under-pc-pndt-act-cognizable-fir-registration-and-police-investigation-not-barred-under-law-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207473,"position":2},"title":"Offences under PC & PNDT Act are cognizable, thus, FIR registration and police investigation per se not barred under law: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"May 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFrom the harmonious reading of the provisions of PC & PNDT Act, which make the offences as cognizable and non-bailable along with the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, it cannot be said that no FIR can be registered or that the registration of FIR is barred under PC &\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328382,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/09\/delhi-high-court-quashes-fir-rape-kidnapping-pocso-based-settlement-section376-section363-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207473,"position":3},"title":"Delhi HC quashes FIR in Rape, Kidnapping, and POCSO case based on Settlement without imposing costs","author":"Arunima","date":"August 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court has quashed an FIR registered under Sections 376 (rape), 363 (kidnapping), and 6 of the POCSO Act (aggravated penetrative assault). The decision was based on an amicable settlement between the parties, with no costs imposed on either side. This case underscores the court's recognition of mutually agreed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312936,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/03\/delhi-hc-quashes-fir-pocso-accused-considering-his-happy-married-life-with-victim-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207473,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Court cannot turn its back on distressed family\u2019: Delhi HC quashes FIR against a man accused under POCSO after considering his happy married life with victim","author":"Arushi","date":"February 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner\u2019s prosecution and conviction will lead to pain and tears in the eyes of the family members and future of two families will be at stake, whereas, if the impugned FIR is quashed, it would serve the ends of justice.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":145702,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/28\/compromise-between-the-parties-can-be-a-ground-for-quashing-fir-under-s-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207473,"position":5},"title":"Compromise between the parties can be a ground for quashing FIR under S. 482 CrPC\u00a0","author":"Saba","date":"July 28, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The petition was filed by the petitioner under S. 482 CrPC for quashing an FIR under Section 420 IPC and S. 24 of the Immigration Act and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. The petitioner pleaded before the Court that compromise had already been reached between\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207473","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207473\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}