{"id":207438,"date":"2018-12-31T10:30:22","date_gmt":"2018-12-31T05:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207438"},"modified":"2019-01-02T17:47:55","modified_gmt":"2019-01-02T12:17:55","slug":"closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/","title":{"rendered":"Closure report not binding on trial court; cognizance of case not to be taken after filling of closure report without directing further investigation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rekha Palli, J. declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC against the order of the CBI Special Court (PC Act) whereby it had ordered further investigation against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was Superintendent of Customs, Kolkata. He was alleged to be a middle-man who took bribe from Rajesh Sarda to be handed over to his superior. Investigations were made against him by the Central Bureau of Investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. CBI had filed a closure report in the same before the Special Court which while considering the report directed the CBI to proceed with a further investigation under Section 173(8) CrPC. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner was before the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Shreya Bhatnagar, Advocate appearing for the petitioner relied on an earlier decision of the Court wherein cognizance was taken by the trial court against Rajesh Sarda was set aside as the CBI had already filed a closure report as was also the case herein. In light of that decision, it was contended that there was no reason why the petitioner should be made to face a prolonged trial. Rajdipa Behura, Special Public Prosecutor submitted reply on behalf of the CBI.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court differentiated the decision mentioned above on that therein the trial court took cognizance of the matter without ordering further investigation which was not the right course. However, in petitioner&#8217;s case, the Special Court had categorically directed the CBI to carry out further investigation under Section 173(8). Furthermore, it was observed, &#8220;<strong>closure report is not binding on the learned trial court, and the court is in fact expected to apply its independent mind to the material on the record, merely because the CBI had made certain observations which partially support the petitioner, cannot be a ground to tinker with the directions for further investigation given by the learned trial court<\/strong>&#8220;. In light of such and other reasons, the Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the petition. [N.K. Rai v. CBI, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/00CbZ3bn\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Del 13200<\/b><\/a>, dated 29-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rekha Palli, J. declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC against the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[10481,33021,33022,7181],"class_list":["post-207438","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cbi","tag-closure-report","tag-section-1783-crpc","tag-trial-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Closure report not binding on trial court; cognizance of case not to be taken after filling of closure report without directing further investigation | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Closure report not binding on trial court; cognizance of case not to be taken after filling of closure report without directing further investigation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rekha Palli, J. declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC against the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-31T05:00:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-02T12:17:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/\",\"name\":\"Closure report not binding on trial court; cognizance of case not to be taken after filling of closure report without directing further investigation | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-31T05:00:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-02T12:17:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Closure report not binding on trial court; cognizance of case not to be taken after filling of closure report without directing further investigation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Closure report not binding on trial court; cognizance of case not to be taken after filling of closure report without directing further investigation | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Closure report not binding on trial court; cognizance of case not to be taken after filling of closure report without directing further investigation","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rekha Palli, J. declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC against the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-31T05:00:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-02T12:17:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/","name":"Closure report not binding on trial court; cognizance of case not to be taken after filling of closure report without directing further investigation | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-31T05:00:22+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-02T12:17:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/31\/closure-report-not-binding-on-trial-court-cognizance-of-case-not-to-be-taken-after-filling-of-closure-report-without-directing-further-investigation\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Closure report not binding on trial court; cognizance of case not to be taken after filling of closure report without directing further investigation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/06\/does-not-find-any-fault-in-the-coda-but-questions-the-agenda\/","url_meta":{"origin":207438,"position":0},"title":"CBI | Does not find any fault in the coda but questions the agenda | Accepts CBI\u2019s closure report but questions the investigation","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI): Shivank Singh, Special Judicial Magistrate (CBI), while accepting the closure report questioned the delayed investigation by the premier investigation agency of the country. While accepting closure report, the Court stated, \u201cIt may be noted that the collective and cogent evidence\/ material gathered by CBI is\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/CBI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/CBI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/CBI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/CBI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/CBI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/25\/raj-hc-%e2%94%82-former-union-minister-granted-interim-protection-from-arrest-court-rebukes-cbi-court-for-issuing-arrest-warrants-laxmi-vilas-palace-hotel-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":207438,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | Former Union Minister granted interim protection from arrest; Court rebukes CBI Court for issuing arrest warrants [Laxmi Vilas Palace Hotel Case]","author":"Editor","date":"September 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Dinesh Mehta, J., granted interim protection from arrest to former Union Minister Arun Shourie along with former disinvestment secretary Pradip Baijal issuing a stay notice and rebuked the CBI court for issuing arrest warrants against them along with 3 others in connection with the Laxmi Vilas Palace\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244175,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/20\/cbi-investigation\/","url_meta":{"origin":207438,"position":2},"title":"CBI | Court traces the \u2018untraced\u2019: Finds needle in haystack| Rejects Closure Report| Issues Summons","author":"Editor","date":"February 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Special Court, CBI, Ghaziabad: Shivank Singh, Special Judicial Magistrate (CBI), rejected the closure report filed by the CBI, stating that the Court was of the view that a prima facie case was made out. And resultantly, took cognizance under Section\u00a0 120B r\/w 302, 201 as well as substantive offences under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/CBI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/CBI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/CBI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/CBI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/CBI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304300,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/10\/delhi-hc-revealing-cbi-enquiry-report-will-impede-investigation-process-thus-exempted-from-disclosure-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207438,"position":3},"title":"Revealing CBI\u2019s enquiry report will impede the investigation process, thus exempted from disclosure under RTI Act, 2005: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThis Court is of the opinion that the information that is being sought by the petitioner would impede the investigation conducted by the CBI involving a large-scale fraud, including many accused.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281826,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/17\/chanda-kochhar-case-cbi-court-allows-addition-of-section-409-ipc-with-fir-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":207438,"position":4},"title":"[Chanda Kochhar Case] CBI Court allows addition of the charge of breach of trust in the FIR","author":"Editor","date":"January 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Special Judge of CBI Court reiterated that it is not necessary for the IO to seek prior permission of the Court for adding or deleting Sections , on the basis of material collected by him, and can intimate about it to the Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"CBI Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-107.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":291549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/delhi-high-court-expunges-remarks-against-cbi-in-judicial-order-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207438,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court sets aside the cost imposed on CBI and expunges remarks made against the authority in a judicial order","author":"Arunima","date":"May 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The duty of the Court has been tried to be delegated to the prosecuting agency in the present case.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207438","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207438"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207438\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207438"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207438"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207438"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}