{"id":207375,"date":"2018-12-29T08:30:35","date_gmt":"2018-12-29T03:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207375"},"modified":"2019-01-02T11:29:58","modified_gmt":"2019-01-02T05:59:58","slug":"witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"Witness may lie but not the circumstances; charges against accused dropped for lack of evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Allahabad High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sinha and Ifaqat Ali Khan, JJ. dismissed the appeal as the applicant failed to prove the alleged charges against the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The applicant through his counsel Afzal Ahmad Khan Durrani has filed an application seeking leave to appeal against the judgment by means of which all the accused persons have been acquitted for the offence punishable under Sections 394\/34, 302\/34, 201, 120B and 411 IPC along with Section 25\/5\/35 Arms Act. He has stated that along with the body of the deceased silver ornaments were also found at the spot.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was important to note that the silver ornaments costed about Rs 5,000 which was a very meagre amount to commit murder plus neither the court could find a reason as to why the accused would commit the murder along with the fact that no active participation of the accused could be proved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court stated that a witness could lie but not the circumstances and in this case chain of pieces of evidence furnished by those circumstances were far from complete which failed to prove the guilt of the accused. Here the Court reiterated the basic rule of criminal jurisprudence according to which if two views were possible on the evidence adduced in a case of circumstantial evidence, one pointing to the guilt of the accused and the other to his innocence, the Court should adopt a view which is favorable to the accused. Hence as the applicant failed to prove the charges against the accused the appeal was dismissed. [Mira Devi v. State of U.P.,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/O0jNzUIl\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine All 3307<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 04-07-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sinha and Ifaqat Ali Khan, JJ. dismissed the appeal as the applicant failed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[20031,3433,32995,32993,32994,2948],"class_list":["post-207375","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-arms-act","tag-circumstantial_evidence","tag-criminal-jurisprudence","tag-lack-of-evidence","tag-leave-to-appeal","tag-murder"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Witness may lie but not the circumstances; charges against accused dropped for lack of evidence | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Witness may lie but not the circumstances; charges against accused dropped for lack of evidence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sinha and Ifaqat Ali Khan, JJ. dismissed the appeal as the applicant failed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-29T03:00:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-02T05:59:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/\",\"name\":\"Witness may lie but not the circumstances; charges against accused dropped for lack of evidence | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-29T03:00:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-02T05:59:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Witness may lie but not the circumstances; charges against accused dropped for lack of evidence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Witness may lie but not the circumstances; charges against accused dropped for lack of evidence | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Witness may lie but not the circumstances; charges against accused dropped for lack of evidence","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Vipin Sinha and Ifaqat Ali Khan, JJ. dismissed the appeal as the applicant failed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-29T03:00:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-02T05:59:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/","name":"Witness may lie but not the circumstances; charges against accused dropped for lack of evidence | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-29T03:00:35+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-02T05:59:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/29\/witness-may-lie-but-not-the-circumstances-charges-against-accused-dropped-for-lack-of-evidence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Witness may lie but not the circumstances; charges against accused dropped for lack of evidence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":241025,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/21\/j-application-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":207375,"position":0},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Non-applicant cannot be convicted on the statement of co-accused recorded under S. 67 of the NDPS Act, 1985; Application dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"December 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench of Sanjay Dhar and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. while dismissing the present application seeking leave to appeal, said, \u201c\u2026the non-applicant cannot be convicted on the statement of co-accused recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, as the same cannot be used as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264448,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/25\/transfer-petition-for-trial-of-salman-khans-deer-hunting-case-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":207375,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | Transfer petition for trial of Salman Khan&#8217;s deer hunting case allowed; High Court to take charge","author":"Editor","date":"March 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., allowed a transfer petition in the infamous deer hunting case of actor Salman Khan. An FIR was lodged with the Forest Department against Salman Khan alongwith Saif Ali Khan, Neelam, Tabbsum @ Tabu, Sonali and Dushyant Singh, who, in pursuance of a complaint,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213565,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/11\/ph-hc-suspicion-however-strong-cannot-take-place-of-the-positive-proof-and-cannot-be-made-basis-of-conviction\/","url_meta":{"origin":207375,"position":2},"title":"P&#038;H HC | Suspicion, however strong, cannot take place of the positive proof and cannot be made basis of conviction","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab And Haryana High Court: The Bench of Rajiv Sharma and Kuldip Singh, JJ., dismissed the application filed under Section 378(4) CrPC against the Judgment passed by the Additional Sessions Judge acquitting the accused-respondents of the charges framed against them under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216780,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/cal-hc-waging-war-conviction-set-aside-burden-of-proving-charge-against-accused-lies-upon-prosecution-absence-whereof-entitles-accused-to-benefit-of-doubt\/","url_meta":{"origin":207375,"position":3},"title":"Cal HC | Waging War: Conviction set aside \u2013 Burden of proving charge against accused lies upon prosecution, absence whereof entitles accused to benefit of doubt","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench of Sanjib Banerjee and Suvra Ghosh, JJ. allowed the appeal filed by two persons who were convicted by the trial court for offence of waging war against the Government of India and set aside the judgment on the grounds of absence of a link\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":58381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/27\/salman-khan-acquitted-of-all-charges-under-wildlife-protection-act-in-poaching-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":207375,"position":4},"title":"Salman Khan acquitted of all charges in poaching cases","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 27, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The bench of Nirmaljit Kaur J., hearing the revision petition filed by the Bollywood actor, held that in absence of any substantial incriminating evidence that could prove the guilt of the petitioner beyond doubt, the conviction and sentence awarded to him under Section 51 of the Wild\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215602,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/12\/all-hc-dying-declaration-administration-of-oath-to-the-deceased-before-recording-his-declaration-does-not-render-its-credibility-doubtful\/","url_meta":{"origin":207375,"position":5},"title":"All HC | Dying Declaration: Administration of oath to the deceased before recording his declaration, does not render its credibility doubtful","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Division Bench of Pritinker Diwaker and Ali Zamin, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the accused and held that the trial Judge was justified in convicting the appellants under Sections 302 and 34 of the Penal Code, 1860. In the present case, the deceased Radhey Shyam\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207375","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207375"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207375\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}