{"id":207231,"date":"2018-12-26T11:00:53","date_gmt":"2018-12-26T05:30:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207231"},"modified":"2018-12-27T12:02:47","modified_gmt":"2018-12-27T06:32:47","slug":"person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/","title":{"rendered":"Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Orissa High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed the petition which challenged the order of the trial court whereunder the application of the plaintiffs filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to implead the wife of Defendant 1 was rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case were that the plaintiffs-petitioners had instituted the suit for permanent injunction and recovery of possession impleading the wife of the defendant as Defendant 2.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The contention of Mr A.P. Bose, Advocate for the petitioners, was that a part of the suit land had been alienated to the wife of the defendant. The said fact came to the knowledge of the plaintiffs after the written statement was filed. The hearing of the suit had not begun. The intervenor was a necessary party to the suit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for defendants Mr S. Udgata, submitted that the written statement was filed in the year 2011. But then, the petition for impleadment was filed after a gap of five years. The intervenor was neither necessary nor proper party to the suit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on the case of <em>Razia Begum<\/em> v. <em>Sahebzadi Anwar Begum,<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/98eLE277\">AIR 1958 SC 886<\/a>, wherein the Apex Court had held that it is firmly established as a result of judicial decisions that in order that a person may be added as a party to a suit, he should have a direct interest in the subject matter of the litigation whether it raises questions relating to movable or immovable property. The suit scheduled land had been alienated to the wife of the defendant. In view of the same, the intervenor was a necessary party to the suit thus the petition was allowed. [Ramesh Chandra Sahoo v. Ranjit Kumar Singh,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/I1mUTTyu\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Ori 436<\/b><\/a>, decided on 19-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed the petition which challenged the order of the trial <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[25874,3795,32943,14201,32839,32427],"class_list":["post-207231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-impleadment","tag-litigation","tag-order-1-rule-10-cpc","tag-permanent-injunction","tag-recovery-of-possession","tag-subject-matter"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed the petition which challenged the order of the trial\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-26T05:30:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-27T06:32:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/\",\"name\":\"Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-26T05:30:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-27T06:32:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit","og_description":"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed the petition which challenged the order of the trial","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-26T05:30:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-27T06:32:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/","name":"Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-26T05:30:53+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-27T06:32:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":276423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/20\/counter-claim-under-order-8-rule-6-cpc-can-only-be-filed-against-plaintiff-supreme-court-property-dispute-defendant-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207231,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Can an independent counter claim under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC having nothing to do with the plaintiffs be allowed?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of UU Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu Dhulia*, JJ has held that a counter claim under Order VIII, Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC) can be set up only \u201cagainst the claim of the plaintiffs\u201d. The Court was dealing with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":259057,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/24\/is-court-justified-in-allowing-application-under-or-12-r-6-cpc-for-absence-of-material-pleadings\/","url_meta":{"origin":207231,"position":1},"title":"Judgment on Admissions | Is Court justified in allowing application under Or. 12 R. 6 CPC for absence of material pleadings, presence of moonshine defence in WS? Del HC discusses","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Asha Menon, J., held that, \u201cMere fact that the boundary walls had been built by the defendants cannot be termed as a hostile act against the true owner as the walls had been constructed to define the properties of the defendants after the family partition took place.\u201d\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/24\/ori-hc-order-21-rule-29-cpc-cannot-come-to-the-rescue-unless-sufficient-cause-is-shown-to-stay-the-execution-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":207231,"position":2},"title":"Ori HC | Order 21 Rule 29 CPC cannot come to the rescue unless sufficient cause is shown to stay the execution case","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of A.K. Rath, J. dismissed the petition filed against the order which rejected the application of the petitioner filed under Order 21 Rule 29 CPC to stay the further proceeding in an execution case till the disposal of another civil suit.\u00a0 The facts of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260477,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/21\/law-on-rejection-of-plaint\/","url_meta":{"origin":207231,"position":3},"title":"Law on Rejection of Plaint | Contents of plaint or Examining sufficiency of plaint? Del HC explains the bounden duty of Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prateek Jalan, J., expressed that, For the purposes of an order under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, the Court must come to the conclusion that the plaint is required to be rejected. Present petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution for directing against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247713,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/27\/sufficient-cause\/","url_meta":{"origin":207231,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Scope of Or. 9 R. 13 CPC application: Whether summons duly served and\/or whether defendant was prevented by &#8216;sufficient cause&#8217; from appearing? Explained","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Manoj Kumar Ohri, J., expressed that \u201cSufficient Cause\u201d is an elastic expression and no hard and fast guidelines are prescribed. In the present matter, Judgment dated 01-02-2019 was sought to be set aside as well as condonation of delay of 582 days. Factual Matrix Permanent Injunction restraining\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":203212,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/06\/court-free-to-invoke-provisions-of-order-8-rule-10-cpc-if-defendant-fails-to-file-ws-permanent-injunction-granted-against-use-of-trademark-cbn-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207231,"position":5},"title":"Court free to invoke provisions of Order 8 Rule 10 CPC if defendant fails to file WS; permanent injunction granted against use of trademark CBN NEWS","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Jayant Nath, J. decreed a suit for permanent injunction by invoking the provisions of Order 8 Rule 10 CPC. The plaintiff was involved in broadcasting activities such as news reporting, producing TV shows and other media content in various parts of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207231\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}