{"id":207191,"date":"2018-12-24T17:30:20","date_gmt":"2018-12-24T12:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207191"},"modified":"2018-12-28T13:06:38","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T07:36:38","slug":"plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/","title":{"rendered":"Plaintiff who is a party to the sale deed and seeks declaration that the sale deed is void, shall pay the ad-valorem court fees"},"content":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., dismissed the petition which challenged the order of the trial court whereby the Court allowed the application of the defendant filed under Order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC and directed the plaintiff to pay ad-valorem court fees.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are as that the plaintiff-petitioner had instituted the suit for declaration of title and declaration that the sale deed executed by him in favor of the defendant as null and void. The litigation started between the parties and the defendant filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11(c) CPC stating that the plaintiff had instituted the suit for declaration that the registered sale deed as void. They contended that the plaintiff was the executant of the sale deed, he sought its cancellation and therefore He should pay ad-valorem court fees. Plaintiff filed an objection to the said application and their counsel, Mr Samir Kumar Mishra and Mr S. Rout contended that the sale deed was a nominal one and no consideration was passed and thus the plaintiff could put his own valuation and pay the court fees.<\/p>\n

The Court, relying on the Umakanta Das v. Pradip Kumar Ray<\/em>, 1986 SCC OnLine Ori 11<\/a>, dismissed the petition and upheld the order of the trial court, directing the petitioners to pay the ad valorem court fees. [Kumar Soumyakanta Bisoi v. Banita Panda,\u00a02018 SCC OnLine Ori 435<\/b><\/a>, decided on 18-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., dismissed the petition which challenged the order of the trial <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32929,32930,32931,30459],"class_list":["post-207191","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ad-valorem","tag-court-fees","tag-order-7-rule-11c-cpc","tag-sale-deed"],"yoast_head":"\nPlaintiff who is a party to the sale deed and seeks declaration that the sale deed is void, shall pay the ad-valorem court fees | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Plaintiff who is a party to the sale deed and seeks declaration that the sale deed is void, shall pay the ad-valorem court fees\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., dismissed the petition which challenged the order of the trial\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-24T12:00:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-28T07:36:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/\",\"name\":\"Plaintiff who is a party to the sale deed and seeks declaration that the sale deed is void, shall pay the ad-valorem court fees | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-24T12:00:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-28T07:36:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Plaintiff who is a party to the sale deed and seeks declaration that the sale deed is void, shall pay the ad-valorem court fees\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Plaintiff who is a party to the sale deed and seeks declaration that the sale deed is void, shall pay the ad-valorem court fees | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Plaintiff who is a party to the sale deed and seeks declaration that the sale deed is void, shall pay the ad-valorem court fees","og_description":"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., dismissed the petition which challenged the order of the trial","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-24T12:00:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-28T07:36:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/","name":"Plaintiff who is a party to the sale deed and seeks declaration that the sale deed is void, shall pay the ad-valorem court fees | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-24T12:00:20+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-28T07:36:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/24\/plaintiff-who-is-a-party-to-the-sale-deed-and-seeks-declaration-that-the-sale-deed-is-void-shall-pay-the-ad-valorem-court-fees\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Plaintiff who is a party to the sale deed and seeks declaration that the sale deed is void, shall pay the ad-valorem court fees"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":237734,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/p-court-allows-revision-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":207191,"position":0},"title":"P&H HC | Pending application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC ought to have been decided prior to the decision in the application under Or. 7 R. 11 CPC; Court allows revision petition","author":"Editor","date":"October 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In a revision petition challenging an order passed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC; Raj Mohan Singh, J., allowed the petition while setting the order aside. The present petition arises from the order dated 07-03-2020 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sirsa, vide\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":311817,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":207191,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses Revisional Application on claim of collusion and fraud; Case to proceed for Trial","author":"Ritu","date":"January 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court clarified that rejection of the plaint is not warranted based on allegations of collusion or lack of cause of action, which are factual issues to be determined during the trial.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251632,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/23\/rejection-of-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":207191,"position":2},"title":"Are Courts empowered to grant time to rectify defects in plaint where the plaint had been rejected under Or. 7 R. 11(d)? SC clarifies","author":"Editor","date":"July 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud* and M R Shah, JJ., affirmed the judgment of Bombay High Court wherein the Single Judge had held that where the suit appears from the statements in the plaint to be barred by any law, the defects are not curable. Background\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255469,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-specific-performance\/","url_meta":{"origin":207191,"position":3},"title":"Law on Specific Performance | For purpose of passing a decree of specific performance, what is essential? SC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Stating that readiness and willingness are necessary for the purpose of passing a decree of specific performance, Division Bench of M.R. Shah and A.S. Bopanna, JJ., expressed that, Straightaway to rely upon the affidavit without amending the plaint and the pleadings is wholly impermissible under the law. Factual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":262546,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/26\/merely-writing-cancelled-on-registered-power-of-attorney-wouldnt-make-it-null-and-void-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":207191,"position":4},"title":"Merely writing “cancelled” on registered power of attorney wouldn’t make it null and void: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of K.M. Joseph* and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, JJ., held that mere writing the word \"cancelled\" or drawing a line would not render Power of Attorney null and void as there must be cancellation and it must further be brought to the notice of the third\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-91.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-91.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-91.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-91.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-91.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347200,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/06\/court-fee-must-be-paid-on-sale-consideration-when-declaratory-suit-involves-title-based-on-agreement-to-sell-mp-hc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":207191,"position":5},"title":"Court Fee must be paid on sale consideration when declaratory suit involves title based on agreement to sell: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere the plaintiff attempts to under-value the plaint and reliefs, the Court has to intervene.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207191","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207191"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207191\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207191"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207191"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207191"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}