{"id":207070,"date":"2018-12-20T11:00:19","date_gmt":"2018-12-20T05:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207070"},"modified":"2018-12-20T10:17:41","modified_gmt":"2018-12-20T04:47:41","slug":"application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/","title":{"rendered":"Application for business rescue proceedings does not terminate the office of provisional liquidators"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa:<\/strong> This appeal was filed before a 5-Judge Bench comprising of Seriti, Cachalia, Molemela and Schippers, JJA; Mothle, AJA., against the judgment and order passed by the Gauteng Division of the High Court.<\/p>\n

The appellant was a limited liability company. Appellant was facing serious financial problems and was ailing as a result of which the company was placed in business rescue whereby provisional business rescue practitioner was appointment who found that the company should be placed under liquidation. The main issue before the court was whether the appointment and the powers of the duly appointed provisional joint liquidators were suspended in terms of Section 131(6) of the Act which states that until business rescue operation ends the liquidation proceedings was to be suspended. It was submitted that Section 131(6) of the Act does not change the status of the company in liquidation nor does it suspend the court order that placed the company under liquidation in the hands of the Master in terms of Section 141(2)(a)<\/em>(ii) of the Act.<\/p>\n

High Court found that the appointment, office and powers of the provisional liquidators were not suspended as the words used in Section 131(6) was \u201csuspend\u201d which does not mean termination. What is suspended is the process of winding-up and not the legal consequences of a winding-up order. Therefore, this appeal was upheld. [GCC Engineering (Pty) Ltd. v. Lawrence Maroos, Case No. 901 of 2017, decided on 03-12-2018]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: This appeal was filed before a 5-Judge Bench comprising of Seriti, Cachalia, Molemela and Schippers, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":39761,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[32895,32894,32892,32893],"class_list":["post-207070","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-limited-liability-company","tag-provisional-liquidators","tag-rescue-proceedings","tag-terminate-office"],"yoast_head":"\nApplication for business rescue proceedings does not terminate the office of provisional liquidators | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Application for business rescue proceedings does not terminate the office of provisional liquidators\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: This appeal was filed before a 5-Judge Bench comprising of Seriti, Cachalia, Molemela and Schippers,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-20T05:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/\",\"name\":\"Application for business rescue proceedings does not terminate the office of provisional liquidators | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-20T05:30:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Application for business rescue proceedings does not terminate the office of provisional liquidators\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Application for business rescue proceedings does not terminate the office of provisional liquidators | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Application for business rescue proceedings does not terminate the office of provisional liquidators","og_description":"Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: This appeal was filed before a 5-Judge Bench comprising of Seriti, Cachalia, Molemela and Schippers,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-20T05:30:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/","name":"Application for business rescue proceedings does not terminate the office of provisional liquidators | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","datePublished":"2018-12-20T05:30:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/application-for-business-rescue-proceedings-does-not-terminate-the-office-of-provisional-liquidators\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Application for business rescue proceedings does not terminate the office of provisional liquidators"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Supreme-Court-of-Appeals.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299832,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/nclat-rejects-liquidators-petition-retrieve-bank-guarantees-fixed-deposit-receipts-under-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207070,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT rejects Liquidator’s petition to retrieve Bank Guarantees\/Fixed Deposit Receipts under IBC","author":"Ritu","date":"August 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that during the moratorium period under Section 14 of IBC, Customs Authorities are authorized to utilize Bank Guarantees and Fixed Deposits furnished against Zero Import Duty.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":140931,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/06\/the-companies-removal-of-difficulties-order-2017-notified\/","url_meta":{"origin":207070,"position":1},"title":"The Companies (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2017, notified","author":"Saba","date":"July 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"S.O. 2042(E).\u2014Whereas clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) provides that on a date which may be notified by the Central Government for the purpose of transfer of pending proceedings, all proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/DSC_4762-e1474523869607.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249238,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/04\/insolvency-professionals-to-act-as-interim-resolution-professionals-liquidators-resolution-professionals-and-bankruptcy-trustees-recommendation-guidelines-2021\/","url_meta":{"origin":207070,"position":2},"title":"Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professionals, Liquidators, Resolution Professionals and Bankruptcy Trustees (Recommendation) Guidelines, 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"On June 01, 20201, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) issued the Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professionals, Liquidators, Resolution Professionals and Bankruptcy Trustees (Recommendation) Guidelines, 2021. These Guidelines shall come into effect for appointments as IRP, Liquidator, RP and BT with effect from July 1,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Insolvency-and-Bankruptcy-Board-of-India.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Insolvency-and-Bankruptcy-Board-of-India.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Insolvency-and-Bankruptcy-Board-of-India.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Insolvency-and-Bankruptcy-Board-of-India.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246383,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/01\/application-under-s-7-or-s-9-ibc-is-an-independent-proceeding-unaffected-by-winding-up-proceedings-that-may-be-filed-qua-the-same-company-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":207070,"position":3},"title":"Application under S. 7 or S. 9 IBC is an independent proceeding unaffected by winding up proceedings that may be filed qua the same company; Supreme Court \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"April 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Rohinton Fali Nariman* and B.R. Gavai, JJ., addressed the instant appeal involving the question that whether an insolvency proceedings could be initiated after the winding up application had been admitted under the Companies Act. The Bench stated, \u201c\u2026every effort should be made to resuscitate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":58431,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/07\/27\/section-14-of-the-limitation-act-1963-does-not-come-to-the-rescue-of-litigant-acting-malafide\/","url_meta":{"origin":207070,"position":4},"title":"Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not come to the rescue of litigant acting malafide","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 27, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Interpreting the provision under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the Court said that despite liberal interpretation placed under the said provision, the matter in issue in the earlier proceeding and the latter proceeding has to be conferred requisite importance.\u00a0 The words \u201cin accordance with law\u201d under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263263,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/07\/raj-hc%e2%94%82-order-of-provisional-attachment-cannot-survive-beyond-a-period-of-one-year-in-terms-of-s-83-2-cgst-act-provisional-attachment-order-stayed\/","url_meta":{"origin":207070,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC\u2502 Order of provisional attachment cannot survive beyond a period of one year in terms of S. 83 (2) CGST Act; Provisional attachment order stayed","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi CJ and Sudesh Bansal J ranted interim relief and stayed the provisional attachment order. \u00a0 The facts of the case is such that the petitioner's bank account was placed under provisional attachment by an order dated 03-12-2020 in exercise of powers\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207070","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207070"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207070\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39761"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207070"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207070"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207070"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}