{"id":207067,"date":"2018-12-20T10:00:36","date_gmt":"2018-12-20T04:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207067"},"modified":"2018-12-21T14:57:42","modified_gmt":"2018-12-21T09:27:42","slug":"section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 69(2) of Partnership Act does not bar unregistered firm from filing suit under NI Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of Additional District Judge whereby petitioners application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was dismissed.<\/p>\n

The respondents, an unregistered partnership firm, had filed a suit against the petitioners for recovery of Rs 24,41,967 on account of dishonour of cheques. The petitioners filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint on the ground that the suit was barred under Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The application was dismissed as mentioned above. Notably, Section 69(2) specifies that no suit to enforce a right arising from a contract shall be instituted in any court against any third party by an unregistered firm. Aggrieved by the dismissal of the application, the petitioners were before the High Court.<\/p>\n

The High Court noted that in the instant case, the respondents were seeking enforcement of liability of the petitioners created under Sections 30 and 37 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cause of action for the plaint was based on dishonour of cheques. Reference was made to the judgment of Kerala High Court in Afsal Baker v. Maya Printers,\u00a0<\/em>2016 SCC OnLine Ker 29914<\/a>, \u00a0wherein it was observed, “by virtue of Section 30 and 37 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, on the dishonour of a cheque, the statute creates\u00a0liability on the drawer, apart from the general law of contracts.”\u00a0<\/i>In such view of the matter, the Court held that since the suit was not based on any contract between the parties, the bar under Section 69(2) of the Partnership Act would not apply. Resultantly, the petition was dismissed. [Hindustan Infrastructure Construction Corpn. Ltd. v. R.S. Woods International Ltd., 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12960<\/a>,<\/b> Order dated 13-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of Additional District <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30606,32890,31861,32891],"class_list":["post-207067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ni-act","tag-section-692-of-partnership-act","tag-suit","tag-unregistered-firm"],"yoast_head":"\nSection 69(2) of Partnership Act does not bar unregistered firm from filing suit under NI Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Section 69(2) of Partnership Act does not bar unregistered firm from filing suit under NI Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of Additional District\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-20T04:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-21T09:27:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/\",\"name\":\"Section 69(2) of Partnership Act does not bar unregistered firm from filing suit under NI Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-20T04:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-21T09:27:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Section 69(2) of Partnership Act does not bar unregistered firm from filing suit under NI Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Section 69(2) of Partnership Act does not bar unregistered firm from filing suit under NI Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Section 69(2) of Partnership Act does not bar unregistered firm from filing suit under NI Act","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of Additional District","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-20T04:30:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-21T09:27:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/","name":"Section 69(2) of Partnership Act does not bar unregistered firm from filing suit under NI Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-20T04:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-21T09:27:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/20\/section-692-of-partnership-act-does-not-bar-unregistered-firm-from-filing-suit-under-ni-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Section 69(2) of Partnership Act does not bar unregistered firm from filing suit under NI Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":276114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/26\/arbitration-proceedings-by-unregistered-partnership-firms\/","url_meta":{"origin":207067,"position":0},"title":"Arbitration Proceedings by Unregistered Partnership Firms","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kumar Bhaskar*","rel":"","context":"In "OP. ED."","block_context":{"text":"OP. ED.","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-165-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-165-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-165-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-165-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-165-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":209053,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/31\/del-hc-not-allowed-to-blow-hot-and-cold-in-same-breath-party-who-knowingly-accepts-benefits-of-an-order-not-permitted-to-assail-it-later\/","url_meta":{"origin":207067,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Not allowed to blow hot and cold in same breath: Party who knowingly accepts benefits of an order not permitted to assail it later","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of Civil Judge (II), Central Districts, Tis Hazari courts by which respondent's application\u00a0under Order 9 Rule 1 read Section 151 CPC was allowed. Respondent was a defendant in the subject civil suit. He filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":255501,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/section-138-negotiable-instruments-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":207067,"position":2},"title":"Law on S. 138 NI Act | Cheque dishonored, case filed under S. 138 NI Act: Can borrower raise defense that lender had no financial capacity to lend money? Complete report on ruling by Tis-Hazari Courts","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi: Devanshu Sajlan, MM NI Act-05, while noting the ingredients of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 acquitted a person charged for offence punishable under Section 138 NI Act. Factual Matrix Present complaint was filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Tis-hazari","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tis-hazari.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299063,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/delhi-hc-revocation-petition-u-s-64-patents-act-is-not-a-suit-within-the-meaning-s10-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207067,"position":3},"title":"Revocation Petition under Section 64 of Patents Act is not a suit within the meaning of Section 10 of CPC: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court cannot create a deeming fiction on its own, where the statute does not do so. In the absence of any provision which deems a revocation petition under Section 64 of the Patents Act to be a suit, a Court cannot, even in the interests of expediency, so hold.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286641,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/09\/supreme-court-emphasises-on-the-limited-scope-of-the-appellate-courts-in-remanding-back-the-matter-for-a-de-novo-trial\/","url_meta":{"origin":207067,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court emphasises on Appellate Courts\u2019 limited scope in remanding back the matter for a de novo trial","author":"Editor","date":"March 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The remand in the present case could only be correlated with Rule 23-A of Order XLI CPC and for its applicability, the necessary requirements were that \u201cthe decree is reversed in appeal and a re-trial is considered necessary\u201d, thus, the Supreme Court held that the remand in the present case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-683.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-683.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-683.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-683.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/delhi-high-court-negligence-of-counsel-not-a-reasonable-ground-within-order-xi-rule-15-cpc-facts-of-the-case-must-disclose-urgency-to-avail-benefit-under-or-xi-r-14-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207067,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court| Negligence of counsel not a reasonable ground within Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC; Facts of the case must disclose \u2018urgency\u2019 to avail benefit under Or. XI R. 1(4) CPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by the petitioner challenging dismissal order in relation to an application filed seeking to place on record, certain additional documents which, according to the application, were a necessary and essential part of the suit, but could not be filed with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207067"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207067\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}