{"id":207014,"date":"2018-12-19T13:00:41","date_gmt":"2018-12-19T07:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207014"},"modified":"2019-01-18T08:33:21","modified_gmt":"2019-01-18T03:03:21","slug":"section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/","title":{"rendered":"Del HC | Section 498-A IPC is continuing offence; wife not barred to claim maintenance under DV Act even after 3 years"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mukta Gupta, J. dismissed a criminal writ petition filed by the husband praying quashing of FIR under Section 498-A IPC and complaint under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act).<\/p>\n

The grounds for seeking quashing of the FIR and the complaint was that they were registered to wreak vengeance and were beyond the period of limitation as the parties separated in 2014. It is pertinent to note that the wife had filed a complaint before CAW Cell in 2015 where a settlement was arrived at between the parties at pre-litigation mediation. However, it was not fully acted upon and even after an application the earlier complaint could not be revived. Thus, the filed fresh complaint in 2018.<\/p>\n

The High Court was of the view that the FIR was within the period of limitation. Relying on Vanka Radhamanohari v. Vanka Venkata Reddy,\u00a0<\/em>(1993) 3 SCC 4<\/a> and Asha Ahuja v. Rajesh Ahuja,\u00a0<\/em>2003 SCC OnLine Del 316<\/a>, the Court held that Section 468 CrPC which deals with “bar to taking cognizance after lapse of period of limitation” is to be read with Section 473 which provides for “extension of period of limitation in certain cases”. Further relying on Arun Vyas v. Anita Vyas<\/em>, (1999) 4 SCC 690<\/a>, it was held that is a continuing offence and each occasion of “cruelty” is a new starting point of limitation. As far as a complaint under Section 12 DV Act is concerned, it was noted that it related to the grant of maintenance for the wife and minor child. It was held that “not providing maintenance is a continuous cause of action and even if for three years the wife did not claim maintenance for herself or for the child, the same would not debar her from seeking maintenance under Section 12 DV Act and the complaint thereon cannot be dismissed being barred by limitation”. In such view of the matter, the petition was dismissed. [Anthony Jose v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12956<\/b><\/a>, decided on 05-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mukta Gupta, J. dismissed a criminal writ petition filed by the husband praying quashing <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2570,30317,3067,2549,31299],"class_list":["post-207014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Cruelty","tag-dv-act","tag-FIR","tag-maintenance","tag-section-498-a-ipc"],"yoast_head":"\nDel HC | Section 498-A IPC is continuing offence; wife not barred to claim maintenance under DV Act even after 3 years | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Del HC | Section 498-A IPC is continuing offence; wife not barred to claim maintenance under DV Act even after 3 years\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mukta Gupta, J. dismissed a criminal writ petition filed by the husband praying quashing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-19T07:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-18T03:03:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/\",\"name\":\"Del HC | Section 498-A IPC is continuing offence; wife not barred to claim maintenance under DV Act even after 3 years | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-19T07:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-18T03:03:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Del HC | Section 498-A IPC is continuing offence; wife not barred to claim maintenance under DV Act even after 3 years\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Del HC | Section 498-A IPC is continuing offence; wife not barred to claim maintenance under DV Act even after 3 years | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Del HC | Section 498-A IPC is continuing offence; wife not barred to claim maintenance under DV Act even after 3 years","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mukta Gupta, J. dismissed a criminal writ petition filed by the husband praying quashing","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-19T07:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-18T03:03:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/","name":"Del HC | Section 498-A IPC is continuing offence; wife not barred to claim maintenance under DV Act even after 3 years | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-19T07:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-18T03:03:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/section-498-a-ipc-is-continuing-offence-wife-not-barred-to-claim-maintenance-under-dv-act-even-after-3-years\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Del HC | Section 498-A IPC is continuing offence; wife not barred to claim maintenance under DV Act even after 3 years"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":308496,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/delhi-hc-focus-of-domestic-violence-act-to-provide-immediate-relief-to-victims-by-way-of-maintenance-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207014,"position":0},"title":"Domestic Violence Act focuses on providing immediate relief to victims through maintenance, not Imprisonment for non-payment of maintenance: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Domestic Violence Act was enacted to offer certain civil remedies to the victims of domestic violence. These remedies encompass an array of protective measures, residence orders, and monetary reliefs, designed to address the multifaceted nature of abuse.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352944,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/09\/dhc-non-issuance-of-summons-in-dv-complaint-against-in-laws\/","url_meta":{"origin":207014,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Stale allegations to exert pressure\u2019; Delhi HC dismisses plea to issue summons to in-laws in domestic violence complaint","author":"Editor","date":"July 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe specific incidents pleaded in the complaint against the husband has already resulted in initiation of criminal proceedings against him and the reliefs sought in the complaint are being pursued against husband and being heard by the Trial Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"non-issuance of summons DV","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/non-issuance-of-summons-DV.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/non-issuance-of-summons-DV.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/non-issuance-of-summons-DV.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/non-issuance-of-summons-DV.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312150,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/chhattisgarh-hc-complaint-filed-by-second-wife-u-s-498a-of-ipc-will-not-be-tenable-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":207014,"position":2},"title":"Complaint\/FIR filed by second wife for offence u\/s 498A of IPC against husband or in-laws will not be tenable: Chhattisgarh High Court","author":"Arushi","date":"January 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is vividly clear that when there are conflicting judgments of the Supreme Court of benches of equal strength, it is the earlier one which is to be followed by this Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"chhattisgarh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":158024,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/18\/scrutinize-the-allegations-carefully-against-close-relatives-of-husband-when-fir-is-filed-under-s-498-a-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207014,"position":3},"title":"Scrutinize the allegations carefully against close relatives of husband when FIR is filed under S. 498-A IPC","author":"Saba","date":"September 18, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: The High Court recently addressed the case of petitioners under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the FIR filed under Sections 323, 406, 498-A, 420, 506 and 120-B IPC on the ground that they had been falsely implicated in the case. Petitioner 1\u00a0 was the mother-in-law\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":360812,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/19\/kerla-hc-no-cognizanceof-rape-under-s-376b-without-separated-wife-complaint\/","url_meta":{"origin":207014,"position":4},"title":"S. 198-B CrPC bars Magistrate from taking cognizance of rape under S. 376-B IPC without complaint by separated wife: Kerala HC","author":"Editor","date":"September 19, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Magistrate had taken cognizance of the offence under Section 376-B IPC upon the final report filed by the Malappuram Police, against the legal embargo contained in Section 198-B CrPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"cognizance of rape","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cognizance-of-rape.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cognizance-of-rape.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cognizance-of-rape.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/cognizance-of-rape.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300297,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quashed-fir-and-criminal-proceeding-due-to-misuse-section-498a-of-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207014,"position":5},"title":"Misuse of Section 498-A IPC| Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes criminal case against in-laws, calls it \u201ca case of reverse cruelty\u201d","author":"Ritu","date":"August 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNow a day it is very common for the husband and wife to reside or do jobs outside of India and their parents are made to suffer in India by way of criminal or matrimonial litigation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207014","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207014"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207014\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}