{"id":207012,"date":"2018-12-19T09:45:32","date_gmt":"2018-12-19T04:15:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=207012"},"modified":"2019-11-11T12:31:23","modified_gmt":"2019-11-11T07:01:23","slug":"adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/","title":{"rendered":"Adultery | Joseph Shine v. Union of India given retrospective effect; conviction under Section 497 IPC set aside"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of M.G. Giratkar, J. allowed revision petition and set aside appellant&#8217;s conviction under Section 497 IPC in light of Supreme Court decision in\u00a0<em>Joseph Shine v. Union of India,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XOYhpdZ3\">2018 SCC OnLine SC 1676<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The applicant was alleged to have had sexual relations with the complainant&#8217;s wife. He was tried and convicted by the trial court for committing the offence of adultery under Section 497 IPC. His appeal thereagainst before the Additional Session Judge was dismissed. Hence, then he filed the present application for revision. It was prayed that in light of the decision in <em>Joseph Shine\u00a0<\/em>where the Supreme Court had held Section 497 to be unconstitutional, the present application ought to be allowed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court relied on\u00a0<em>A.S. Gauraya v. S.N. Thakur,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0C0qqP3L\">(1986) 2 SCC 709<\/a> wherein it was held that a law declared by Supreme Court applies even to pending proceedings with retrospective effect. Hence, the Court gave a retrospective effect to the law laid down in <em>Joseph Shine\u00a0<\/em>to the proceeding pending before it. The Supreme Court in\u00a0<em>Joseph Shine\u00a0<\/em>held Section 497 IPC and Section 198 (2) CrPC to be violative of Articles 14, 15(1) and 21 and therefore unconstitutional. Therefore, in view of\u00a0<em>Joseph Shine,\u00a0<\/em>the conviction and punishment awarded to the applicant under Section 497 was quashed and set aside. [Rupesh v. Charandas, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/QN7oX2T7\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Bom 6292<\/b><\/a>, dated 14-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of M.G. Giratkar, J. allowed revision petition and set aside appellant&#8217;s conviction under Section 497 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2638,3468,4581,26084],"class_list":["post-207012","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adultery","tag-conviction","tag-retrospective-effect","tag-section-497-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Adultery | Joseph Shine v. Union of India given retrospective effect; conviction under Section 497 IPC set aside | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Adultery | Joseph Shine v. Union of India given retrospective effect; conviction under Section 497 IPC set aside\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of M.G. Giratkar, J. allowed revision petition and set aside appellant&#8217;s conviction under Section 497\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-19T04:15:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-11T07:01:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/\",\"name\":\"Adultery | Joseph Shine v. Union of India given retrospective effect; conviction under Section 497 IPC set aside | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-19T04:15:32+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-11T07:01:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Adultery | Joseph Shine v. Union of India given retrospective effect; conviction under Section 497 IPC set aside\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Adultery | Joseph Shine v. Union of India given retrospective effect; conviction under Section 497 IPC set aside | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Adultery | Joseph Shine v. Union of India given retrospective effect; conviction under Section 497 IPC set aside","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of M.G. Giratkar, J. allowed revision petition and set aside appellant&#8217;s conviction under Section 497","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-19T04:15:32+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-11T07:01:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/","name":"Adultery | Joseph Shine v. Union of India given retrospective effect; conviction under Section 497 IPC set aside | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2018-12-19T04:15:32+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-11T07:01:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/19\/adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-conviction-under-section-497-ipc-set-aside\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Adultery | Joseph Shine v. Union of India given retrospective effect; conviction under Section 497 IPC set aside"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/08\/pat-hc-adultery-joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-given-retrospective-effect-proceedings-under-s-497-ipc-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":207012,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Adultery: Joseph Shine v. Union of India given retrospective effect; proceedings under S. 497 IPC set aside","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. quashed criminal proceeding filed in the year 2013 under Section 497 of the Penal Code, 1860 against a person accused of adultery, in view of Supreme Court\u2019s decision in Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39. Petitioner herein\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":251077,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/09\/adultery-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":207012,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | Is the law laid down by the Supreme Court applicable prospectively? Will adultery committed prior to Joseph Shine decision attract conviction when the offence has been declared unconstitutional pre-conviction?","author":"Editor","date":"July 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J., acquitted a person convicted under Section 497 of IPC contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39, wherein Section 497 of IPC had been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":199386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/01\/adultery-section-497-ipc-dent-on-the-individual-identity\/","url_meta":{"origin":207012,"position":2},"title":"Adultery: Section 497 IPC | Dent on the individual identity?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and Rohinton Fali Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, Dr DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, JJ., commenced with the proceedings on reconsideration of the judgments on the Constitutional validity of Section 497 IPC that brings adultery into the box of criminalization. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/17\/supreme-court-to-decide-the-effect-of-joseph-shine-judgment-on-the-defence-personnels-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":207012,"position":3},"title":"Decriminalisation of Adultery| Applicability of 2018 Joseph Shine judgment to defence personnels: Supreme Court reserves judgment","author":"Editor","date":"February 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Applicant submitted that the 2018 judgment may cause instability within the defence personnel's services since they function in peculiar conditions who are separated from their families for long durations when posted on borders under challenging conditions, in view of the 2018 judgment, there will always be a concern in their\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-416.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":210399,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/21\/adultery-s-497-ipc-and-s-1982-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":207012,"position":4},"title":"Adultery [S. 497 IPC and S. 198(2) CrPC]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tejaswi Pandit\u2020","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law made Easy&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law made Easy","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/law-made-easy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/adultery-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/adultery-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/adultery-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/adultery-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/adultery-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199527,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/02\/day-2-adultery-section-497-ipc-de-criminalising-adultery-is-not-licensing-adultery-dy-chandrachud-j\/","url_meta":{"origin":207012,"position":5},"title":"[Day-2] Adultery: Section 497 IPC | De-criminalising adultery is not licensing adultery: Dr DY Chandrachud J.","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-Judge Constitution bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and RF Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, Dr DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, JJ., commenced with the day 2 on the Constitutional validity of Section 497 IPC hearing in regard to \u201cAdultery\u201d. Learned Counsel Kaleeswaram began with the arguments and placed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207012","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=207012"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/207012\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=207012"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=207012"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=207012"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}