{"id":206903,"date":"2018-12-17T09:30:12","date_gmt":"2018-12-17T04:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206903"},"modified":"2018-12-18T13:30:41","modified_gmt":"2018-12-18T08:00:41","slug":"sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/","title":{"rendered":"SC explains High Court&#8217;s jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a &#8220;Note for clarification of Minutes&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Bench comprising of A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan and M.R. Shah, JJ. disposed of a matter concerning execution of conveyance deed and set aside the orders passed by Bombay High Court for want of jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present proceeding arose out of a suit filed by original plaintiffs&#8211; purchasers of flats in the building developed by the defendant Trust. The plaintiffs filed a suit before the trial court for directing the Trust to perform its obligations including execution of conveyance deed of the plot where the subject building was developed. The trial court decreed the suit of plaintiffs. Aggrieved by the same, the Trust approached the High Court. Before the High Court, the plaintiffs filed\u00a0<em>Note for speaking to Minutes\u00a0<\/em>for clarification of certain details on record. The High Court dismissed the appeals and petitions filed by the Trust. However, it is pertinent to note that the impugned order was passed by the High Court below the\u00a0<em>Note.\u00a0<\/em>Aggrieved by orders of the High Court, the Trust preferred the present appeals. The Supreme Court quashed the impugned orders on certain grounds including, inter alia, for want of jurisdiction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court was of the opinion that while passing the order below the\u00a0<em>Note,\u00a0<\/em>the High Court traveled beyond its jurisdiction in regard to the scope of deciding a <em>Note for speaking to Minutes<\/em>. It explained, &#8220;A\u00a0<i>Note for\u00a0speaking to Minutes\u00a0<\/i>is required to be entertained only for the limited purpose of correcting a typographical error or an error through oversight, which may have crept in while transcribing the original order. Once, the judgment\/order is pronounced and if any party to the same wants any rectification of any typographical error and any clerical mistake regarding the date or number, such a party may apply to the concerned Court for correcting such an error in the judgment\/order. However, a <em>Note for speaking to the Minutes\u00a0<\/em>cannot be considered at par with a review application or in a given case, with an application for clarification\/modification of an order. A\u00a0<em>Note for speaking to the Minutes\u00a0<\/em>can never be considered to be an application of such a nature.&#8221; It was held that while passing the impugned order below the <em>Note,\u00a0<\/em>the High Court virtually modified its original order passed in the first appeal. Such a course was not open to the High Court and therefore the order was liable to be set aside. For such and other reasons, the impugned orders of the High Court were set aside. [Akhil Bhartvarshiya Marwari Agarwal Jatiya Kosh v. Brijal Tibrewal,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NweXk1Mc\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine SC 2816<\/b><\/a>, decided on 14-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan and M.R. Shah, JJ. disposed of a matter concerning execution of conveyance deed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[15591,11801,2554,32844],"class_list":["post-206903","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-conveyance-deed","tag-high-court","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-note-for-speaking-to-minutes"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC explains High Court&#039;s jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a &quot;Note for clarification of Minutes&quot; | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC explains High Court&#039;s jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a &quot;Note for clarification of Minutes&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan and M.R. Shah, JJ. disposed of a matter concerning execution of conveyance deed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-17T04:00:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-18T08:00:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/\",\"name\":\"SC explains High Court's jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a \\\"Note for clarification of Minutes\\\" | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-17T04:00:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-18T08:00:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC explains High Court&#8217;s jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a &#8220;Note for clarification of Minutes&#8221;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC explains High Court's jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a \"Note for clarification of Minutes\" | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC explains High Court's jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a \"Note for clarification of Minutes\"","og_description":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan and M.R. Shah, JJ. disposed of a matter concerning execution of conveyance deed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-17T04:00:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-18T08:00:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/","name":"SC explains High Court's jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a \"Note for clarification of Minutes\" | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-12-17T04:00:12+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-18T08:00:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/17\/sc-explains-high-courts-jurisdiction-in-regard-to-scope-of-deciding-a-note-for-clarification-of-minutes\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC explains High Court&#8217;s jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a &#8220;Note for clarification of Minutes&#8221;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":281767,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/17\/split-verdict-whether-non-production-poa-during-suit-to-prove-sale-deed-which-was-executed-on-strength-of-poa-would-fatal-to-case-of-plaintiff-legal-news-legal-research-updates-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":206903,"position":0},"title":"Whether non-production of Power of Attorney to prove a sale deed would be fatal to the case of the plaintiff?; Supreme Court&#8217;s split verdict","author":"Editor","date":"January 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While Justice Shah stated that the plaintiff had not produced the Power of Attorney, Justice Nagarathna opined that non-production of Power of Attorney was not fatal to the case of the original plaintiff.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-98.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":246394,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/02\/partition-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":206903,"position":1},"title":"Madras HC | Daughters filed partition suit while disowning their registered release deed. As per S. 92 of Evidence Act, burden to adduce evidence sufficient to exclude written evidence will be on the daughters? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G. Jayachandran, J., the instant suit was filed with regard to the relief of partition and permanent injunction from alienating or encumbering the suit property. Instant suit was filed for partition by daughters of Late Palanisamy Gounder against his sons was dismissed by the trial court while\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260656,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/27\/gift-deed-by-an-old-illiterate-woman-sc-approves-not-legalistic-but-holistic-approach-by-lower-courts-to-determine-validity-of-deed-hcs-verdict-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":206903,"position":2},"title":"Gift deed by an old illiterate woman: SC approves not legalistic but holistic approach by lower courts to determine validity of deed. HC&#8217;s verdict set aside","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an issue relating to the alleged gift deed by an old illiterate woman, the bench of MR Shah and Sanjiv Khanna*, JJ has held that when a person obtains any benefit from another, the court would call upon the person who wishes to maintain the right to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-57.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-57.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-57.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-57.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-57.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244598,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/27\/conveyance-deed\/","url_meta":{"origin":206903,"position":3},"title":"NCDRC | Conveyance Deed forced on apartments buyers in lieu of Apartment Deed? Commission says it cannot go beyond express terms of the agreement entered into between parties","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): C. Viswanath (Presiding Member) dismissed the complaint while granting an opportunity to the Complainant to approach any Appropriate Forum\/ Authority of Court. The instant complaint was filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Complainant a resident and owner of an apartment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239980,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/01\/bom-hc-can-court-revoke-a-conditional-gift-deed-on-non-compliance-of-an-undertaking-in-light-of-which-the-said-deed-was-executed\/","url_meta":{"origin":206903,"position":4},"title":"Bom HC | Can Court revoke a &#8216;conditional gift deed&#8217; on non-compliance of an undertaking in light of which the said deed was executed?\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A.K. Menon, J., addressed a matter wherein an arrangement was executed between the parties for taking care of the elderly mother in light of a conditional gift deed. The instant application was filed by the plaintiffs praying for urgent relief. Plaintiff 1 is not a resident of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/02\/chh-hc-secondary-evidence-not-permissible-if-the-original-documents-are-not-produced-at-any-time-nor-has-any-factual-foundation-been-laid-for-giving-secondary-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":206903,"position":5},"title":"Chh HC | Secondary evidence not permissible if the original documents are not produced at any time nor has any factual foundation been laid for giving secondary evidence","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K Agrawal, J.,\u00a0 allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders of the First Appellate Court being unreasonable. The facts of the case are such that the suit accommodation was of one Abdul Wahid Khan who sold the property to plaintiffs vide sale deed and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206903","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206903"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206903\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206903"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206903"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206903"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}