{"id":206888,"date":"2018-12-15T20:00:54","date_gmt":"2018-12-15T14:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206888"},"modified":"2018-12-18T15:19:45","modified_gmt":"2018-12-18T09:49:45","slug":"quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/","title":{"rendered":"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu and Kashmir High Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed the petition of the husband as he failed to provide any ground that the cases filed by wife were frivolous and were only to harass him.<\/p>\n

The petition was filed under Section 561-A CrPC for quashing of complaint that was pending in the Court of Munsiff, a complaint\/petition under Section 12 of J&K Protection of Women under Domestic Violence Act, 2010 that was pending in the Court of Excise Magistrate Jammu; petition under Section 488 CrPC that was pending in the Court of Munsiff JMIC, Jammu; and FIR registered at Police Station, Jammu for offence under Sections 498-A and 323 RPC.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case are that the marriage between petitioner and respondent was solemnized 25 years back. Their married life remained peaceful for almost 20 to 21 years and thereafter there arose problems which led to the current petition.<\/p>\n

The court dismissed this petition stating that all the petitions and Criminal complaint were filed by the respondent under the statutory provisions of law and petitioner was not able to make out any grounds for quashing the aforesaid proceedings.[Sobat Ali v. Hamida Bibi,2018 SCC OnLine J&K 959<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 14-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed the petition of the husband as <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6881,32841,30775,32842],"class_list":["post-206888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-complaint","tag-frivolous","tag-harass","tag-section-561-a-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nQuashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed the petition of the husband as\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-15T14:30:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-18T09:49:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/15\\\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/15\\\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-15T14:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-18T09:49:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/15\\\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":222,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"complaint\",\"Frivolous\",\"harass\",\"Section 561-A CrPC\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/15\\\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/15\\\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/15\\\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\\\/\",\"name\":\"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-15T14:30:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-18T09:49:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/15\\\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/15\\\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/15\\\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed the petition of the husband as","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-15T14:30:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-18T09:49:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous","datePublished":"2018-12-15T14:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-18T09:49:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/"},"wordCount":222,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["complaint","Frivolous","harass","Section 561-A CrPC"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/","name":"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-15T14:30:54+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-18T09:49:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/quashing-of-complaint-refused-as-husband-failed-to-prove-that-cases-filed-by-wife-were-frivolous\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":205778,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/27\/an-fir-can-be-quashed-only-in-order-to-prevent-abuse-of-process-of-law-or-to-secure-the-ends-of-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":206888,"position":0},"title":"An FIR can be quashed only in order to prevent abuse of process of law or to secure the ends of justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 27, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J., dismissed a petition filed under Section 561-A of the Jammu & Kashmir CrPC, whereby the petitioner sought quashing of an FIR filed against him for offences under Sections 427 & 379 of the Ranbir Penal Code,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":260959,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/01\/instead-of-filing-an-appeal-before-the-sessions-court-petitioner-rushed-to-this-court-invoking-its-inherent-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":206888,"position":1},"title":"Instead of filing an appeal before the Sessions Court petitioner rushed to this Court invoking its inherent power. Can High Court exercise its inherent power? Read J&K and Ladakh HC\u2019s decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Mohd. Akram Chowdhury, J., reiterated the settled position of law that if an alternate efficacious remedy is available under the statute, the inherent power of this Court cannot be invoked. A complaint was filed against the petitioner under the provisions of the Jammu\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":226448,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/03\/jk-hc-court-refrains-from-making-prima-facie-decision-when-the-facts-and-evidence-of-the-matter-is-incomplete\/","url_meta":{"origin":206888,"position":2},"title":"J&K HC | Court refrains from making prima facie decision when the facts and evidence of the matter is incomplete","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 3, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey J., dismissed a petition under Section 561A of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking to quash an FIR. The present case relates to a petition filed for quashing of FIR and all consequential proceedings. The petitioners did not appear for the earlier\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/17\/magistrate\/","url_meta":{"origin":206888,"position":3},"title":"J&K HC | When a CJM transfers a petition to a Magistrate subordinate to him, the Magistrate is conferred with jurisdiction to entertain the same even if the matter would otherwise fall outside his jurisdiction","author":"Editor","date":"March 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar, J., addressed the instant petition against the order of Judicial Magistrate, Bandipora, whereby the Magistrate had returned the petition seeking maintenance stating it to be beyond the jurisdiction of the Trial Court. The Bench remarked, \u201cIf at all there was any ground for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200790,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/inherent-power-of-the-hc-to-recall-orders-in-criminal-cases-a-tool-to-be-used-in-exceptional-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":206888,"position":4},"title":"Inherent power of the HC to recall orders in criminal cases: A tool to be used in exceptional cases","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of M.K. Hanjura, J., allowed an application filed against the order dismissing the petitioner\u2019s petition under Section 561-A of the CrPC, 1989 [Jammu & Kashmir]. The petitioner sought quashing of the dismissal order primarily on the ground that it was passed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/","url_meta":{"origin":206888,"position":5},"title":"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Tashi Rabstan, J. upheld the finding of the revisional court as it was found to be well reasoned and no abuse of process of law was visible, warranting any interference from the instant Court. The petitioner filed the instant petition under Section 561-A of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206888"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206888\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}