{"id":206856,"date":"2018-12-15T11:00:23","date_gmt":"2018-12-15T05:30:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206856"},"modified":"2018-12-17T10:01:36","modified_gmt":"2018-12-17T04:31:36","slug":"landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/","title":{"rendered":"Landlord not entitled to claim damages after termination of tenancy if he fails to take steps for recovery of possession"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.M. Dhavale, J. dismissed a second appeal filed against the order made in first appeal wherein it was held that the plaintiffs were not entitled to claim damages for wrongful possession of rented premises by the defendant.<\/p>\n

The plaintiffs were owners of the subject property which was let out to Nizam Government which handed it over to Zila Parishad. In the year 1990, Zila Parishad terminated its own tenancy and directed\u00a0its officials yo handover the possession of the property to plaintiffs. However, this direction was not complied with. It was also an admitted fact that plaintiffs did not take any step to recover the possession of the property and were now directly before the Court claim damages for wrongful possession by Zila Parishad.<\/p>\n

Question before the Court was “Whether the landlord would be entitled for damages after termination of tenancy if he does not take any step for recovery of possession for more than 12 years after termination?”<\/p>\n

The High Court referred to Chander Kali Bai v. Jagdish Singh Thakur<\/em>, (1977) 4 SCC 402<\/a> wherein it was observed, “if a tenant continues in possession after termination of contractual tenancy, he would not be liable for damages till the decree for eviction is passed.” In the instant case, no decree for eviction was passed. The tenant Zila Parishad itself terminated the tenancy. In such case, the landlord plaintiffs were bound to file suit for possession. He could not directly file suit for damages for the amount not agreed under the contract. Furthermore, damages by way of mesne\u00a0profits\u00a0<\/em>can be awarded under Order 20 Rule 12 only from the date of decree for possession for the period for which the possession is wrongfully retained in spite of the decree. In such view of the matter, the second appeal was dismissed. [Arvind v. State,\u00a02018 SCC OnLine Bom 6069<\/a>,\u00a0<\/b>decided on 10-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.M. Dhavale, J. dismissed a second appeal filed against the order made in first <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3755,8251,32839,9741],"class_list":["post-206856","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-damages","tag-landlord","tag-recovery-of-possession","tag-tenancy"],"yoast_head":"\nLandlord not entitled to claim damages after termination of tenancy if he fails to take steps for recovery of possession | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Landlord not entitled to claim damages after termination of tenancy if he fails to take steps for recovery of possession\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.M. Dhavale, J. dismissed a second appeal filed against the order made in first\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-15T05:30:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-17T04:31:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/\",\"name\":\"Landlord not entitled to claim damages after termination of tenancy if he fails to take steps for recovery of possession | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-15T05:30:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-17T04:31:36+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Landlord not entitled to claim damages after termination of tenancy if he fails to take steps for recovery of possession\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Landlord not entitled to claim damages after termination of tenancy if he fails to take steps for recovery of possession | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Landlord not entitled to claim damages after termination of tenancy if he fails to take steps for recovery of possession","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of A.M. Dhavale, J. dismissed a second appeal filed against the order made in first","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-15T05:30:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-17T04:31:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/","name":"Landlord not entitled to claim damages after termination of tenancy if he fails to take steps for recovery of possession | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2018-12-15T05:30:23+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-17T04:31:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/15\/landlord-not-entitled-to-claim-damages-after-termination-of-tenancy-if-he-fails-to-take-steps-for-recovery-of-possession\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Landlord not entitled to claim damages after termination of tenancy if he fails to take steps for recovery of possession"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":294529,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/landlord-cannot-refuse-to-accept-possession-of-suit-property-patiala-house\/","url_meta":{"origin":206856,"position":0},"title":"Landlord cannot refuse to take over possession of suit property upon determination of lease on pretext of damage to the property; Patiala House Court reiterates","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The landlord was offered the possession of the suit property which was refused by him on the pretext of damage to the suit property, whereas no evidence has been adduced by him about damage to the suit property except his bald statements.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patiala House Courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198767,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/single-co-owner-co-landlord-cannot-by-himself-terminate-a-tenancy\/","url_meta":{"origin":206856,"position":1},"title":"Single co-owner\/co-landlord cannot, by himself, terminate a tenancy","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Valmiki Mehta, J. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 96 of CPC\u00a0 against the judgment of the trial court whereby appellant\u2019s suit for possession and mesne profits was dismissed. The suit was dismissed by the trial court holding that the appellant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":276423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/20\/counter-claim-under-order-8-rule-6-cpc-can-only-be-filed-against-plaintiff-supreme-court-property-dispute-defendant-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206856,"position":2},"title":"Explained| Can an independent counter claim under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC having nothing to do with the plaintiffs be allowed?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 20, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of UU Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu Dhulia*, JJ has held that a counter claim under Order VIII, Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (CPC) can be set up only \u201cagainst the claim of the plaintiffs\u201d. The Court was dealing with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/Can-an-independent-counter-claim-under-Order-VIII-Rule-6A-CPC-having-nothing-to-do-with-the-plaintiffs-be-allowed-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347314,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/07\/right-to-property-occupies-sacrosanct-position-dhc-orders-to-pay-rs1-76-crore-for-illegal-occupation-of-private-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":206856,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Right to property occupies sacrosanct position\u2019: Delhi HC orders Centre to pay Rs. 1.76 crore for illegal occupation of private property for two decades","author":"Arushi","date":"May 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe State, being a constitutional authority and repository of public trust, is duty-bound to protect, rather than transgress, the civil rights of its citizens, including the right to property. The powers of the State are not plenary or absolute but are circumscribed by constitutional and statutory limitations.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311358,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":206856,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction","author":"Ritu","date":"January 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cEven if there are certain clauses which the parties may have aided from the tenancy legislation, is no ground to \u2026 declare the unambiguous leave and licence agreement to be an agreement of tenancy ignoring preponderance of probability.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324938,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/23\/mere-deposit-of-rent-not-sufficient-to-establish-landlord-tenant-relationship-between-tenants-mortgagee-landlord-of-leased-property-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":206856,"position":5},"title":"Never Reported Judgment | Mere deposit of monthly rent by mortgagee not sufficient to establish landlord-tenant relationship between tenant\u2019s mortgagee and landlord of leased property [(1953) 1 SCC 603]","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court\u2019s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1953 on landlord-tenant relationship.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"landlord-tenant relationship","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/NRJ-1-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/NRJ-1-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/NRJ-1-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/NRJ-1-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206856","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206856"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206856\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206856"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206856"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206856"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}