{"id":206756,"date":"2018-12-13T11:13:53","date_gmt":"2018-12-13T05:43:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206756"},"modified":"2018-12-28T12:43:08","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T07:13:08","slug":"in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"In absence of any defence on record, judgment and decree passed cannot be sustained: Punjab and Haryana HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Punjab and Haryana High Court:<\/strong> This appeal was preferred before a 2-Judge Bench of Rakesh Kumar and\u00a0 Anupinder Singh, JJ., against the judgment and decree passed by the Additional District Judge by which petition filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the respondent-husband for annulment of marriage with the appellant-wife was allowed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">During the pendency of this appeal, the appellant filed an application for maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 of the Act. The above application was allowed and thereby the respondent was supposed to pay Rs. 5,000 per month towards maintenance pendente lite. But since respondent failed to do so he was directed to pay entire arrears of maintenance pendente elite. The only contention made by respondent for non-payment of maintenance was that he did not have any money to give. High Court struck off respondent\u2019s only defence leaving with the issue that if the respondent has no defence can the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court sustain or is to be set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court struck off the defence of respondent on the ground of non-payment of maintenance, that he wanted annulment of marriage on the ground that appellant had already married twice and marriage with respondent was her third marriage with previous marriage subsisting. Thus, there remained no defence on record for annulment of marriage. Therefore, this appeal was allowed and judgment and decree passed by trial court was set aside. [Sonia v. Deepak,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2j6X9PmL\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 2024<\/b><\/a>, decided on 04-12-2018]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab and Haryana High Court: This appeal was preferred before a 2-Judge Bench of Rakesh Kumar and\u00a0 Anupinder Singh, JJ., against the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2713,3556,12981,2549,30320,30970],"class_list":["post-206756","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-decree","tag-defence","tag-judgment","tag-maintenance","tag-order","tag-pendente-lite"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>In absence of any defence on record, judgment and decree passed cannot be sustained: Punjab and Haryana HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In absence of any defence on record, judgment and decree passed cannot be sustained: Punjab and Haryana HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This appeal was preferred before a 2-Judge Bench of Rakesh Kumar and\u00a0 Anupinder Singh, JJ., against the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-13T05:43:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-28T07:13:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"In absence of any defence on record, judgment and decree passed cannot be sustained: Punjab and Haryana HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-13T05:43:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-28T07:13:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"In absence of any defence on record, judgment and decree passed cannot be sustained: Punjab and Haryana HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In absence of any defence on record, judgment and decree passed cannot be sustained: Punjab and Haryana HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In absence of any defence on record, judgment and decree passed cannot be sustained: Punjab and Haryana HC","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This appeal was preferred before a 2-Judge Bench of Rakesh Kumar and\u00a0 Anupinder Singh, JJ., against the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-13T05:43:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-28T07:13:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/","name":"In absence of any defence on record, judgment and decree passed cannot be sustained: Punjab and Haryana HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-13T05:43:53+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-28T07:13:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/13\/in-absence-of-any-defence-on-record-judgment-and-decree-passed-cannot-be-sustained-punjab-and-haryana-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"In absence of any defence on record, judgment and decree passed cannot be sustained: Punjab and Haryana HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":198452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/12\/estimation-of-husbands-income-is-permissible-while-granting-maintenance-pendente-lite-under-section-24-hindu-marriage-act-1955\/","url_meta":{"origin":206756,"position":0},"title":"Estimation of husband&#8217;s income is permissible while granting maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench comprising of M.M.S. Bedi and Anupinder Singh Grewal, JJ. allowed an application filed by the respondent-wife for maintenance pendente lite. The appellant-husband had preferred an appeal against the dismissal of his divorce petition. The respondent-wife had filed the application under Section 24\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":274508,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/26\/evidence-not-adduced-maintenance-application-not-decided-bombay-high-court-remands-divorce-matter-to-family-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":206756,"position":1},"title":"Evidence not adduced; Maintenance application not decided: Bombay High Court remands divorce matter to Family Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court: In a case filed by a wife (\u2018appellant') challenging the Family Court order that granted decree of divorce without giving her opportunity to adduce evidence and without deciding her interim application for maintenance, a Division Bench of A S Chandurkar and Urmila Joshi Phalke, JJ.,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243444,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/05\/del-hc-can-an-application-under-s-24-hma-survive-beyond-dismissal-of-the-main-divorce-proceeding-read-why-hc-dismissed-the-applicant-for-maintenance-pendente-lite\/","url_meta":{"origin":206756,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Can an application under S. 24 HMA survive beyond dismissal of the main divorce proceeding? Read why HC dismissed the application for maintenance pendente lite","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J., dismissed an application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act on finding no interest in the same by the wife. Petitioner filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking divorce from his wife. To which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":307734,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206756,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi High Court reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000","author":"Simranjeet","date":"November 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe spouse having reasonable capacity of earning but chooses to remain unemployed without indicating sincere efforts to gain employment, should not be permitted to saddle other party with one sided responsibility of meeting out expenses.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 24 HMA gender neutral","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/husband-not-allowed-to-take-benefit-of-non-disclosure-of-income-and-defeat-legitimate-right-of-wife-no-reduction-in-amount-of-maintenance-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":206756,"position":4},"title":"Husband not allowed to take benefit of non-disclosure of income and defeat legitimate right of wife; no reduction in amount of maintenance: Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and G.S. Sistani, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the husband against the award of maintenance pendente lite awarded to the wife by the family court. The instant appeal was filed by the husband under Section 19 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216951,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/17\/cal-hc-wife-who-is-capable-of-maintaining-herself-independently-cannot-claim-alimony-pendente-lite-under-s-36-of-special-marriage-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":206756,"position":5},"title":"Cal HC | Wife, capable of maintaining herself independently, cannot claim alimony pendente lite under S. 36 of Special Marriage Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Biswajit Basu, J. dismissed a revision application of the filed by a lady seeking alimony pendente lite. The husband\/respondent and the wife herein had filed a matrimonial suit seeking dissolution of their marriage by a decree of divorce, inter alia, on the grounds of cruelty. In the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206756","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206756"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206756\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206756"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206756"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206756"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}