{"id":206744,"date":"2018-12-12T19:15:41","date_gmt":"2018-12-12T13:45:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206744"},"modified":"2018-12-28T14:15:05","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T08:45:05","slug":"deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka HC clarifies application of Section 306 of Karnataka Municipalities Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of Dinesh Maheshwari CJ and S. Sujatha, J. declined to exercise PIL jurisdiction in petition filed by residents of Kottur Town Panchayath challenging approval for construction of town panchayath building on a land.<\/p>\n

Mr N. Shankarayana Bhat, counsel on behalf of the petitioners, placed reliance on the Record of Rights (RTC) and submitted that the subject land was reserved for public purpose and specifically shown as \u2018park and overhead water tank\u2019 in revenue records. It was submitted that the order granting approval for construction of new panchayath building in that land was not as per procedure prescribed under Section 306 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 and as such unsustainable in law.<\/p>\n

Learned counsel Mr M.V. Hiremath, appearing on behalf of respondent, refuted the contentions of petitioner and submitted that the subject land was purchased by respondent for constructing town panchayath office and water tank, and RTC records clearly depicted the land to be for official buildings and water tank.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the subject land was purchased by respondent through a registered sale deed for constructing panchayath building and water tank. However, mistakenly, the RTC extracts reflected purpose of land as \u2018park and water tank\u2019. The said mistake was corrected on respondent\u2019s representation and that order remained unchallenged. The said order, having attained finality, petitioner could not seek liberty to maintain a park in the subject land.<\/p>\n

It was further held that Section 306 of the Act is applicable only if Deputy Commissioner is of the opinion that execution of any order or resolution of a town municipal council is unlawful, or is likely to cause injury\/ annoyance to public, or lead to a breach of peace.<\/p>\n

Since the proposal to use subject land for building panchayath office and water tank did not militate against public interest, the petition was dismissed.[K.S. Iswara Goud v. Town Panchayath, Kottur,\u00a02018 SCC OnLine Kar 2705<\/b><\/a>, decided on 10-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dinesh Maheshwari CJ and S. Sujatha, J. declined to exercise PIL jurisdiction in petition <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32636,30486,30320,30410,32807,32808],"class_list":["post-206744","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-deputy-commissioner","tag-injury","tag-order","tag-public","tag-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act","tag-unlawful"],"yoast_head":"\nKarnataka HC clarifies application of Section 306 of Karnataka Municipalities Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka HC clarifies application of Section 306 of Karnataka Municipalities Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dinesh Maheshwari CJ and S. Sujatha, J. declined to exercise PIL jurisdiction in petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-12T13:45:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-28T08:45:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/\",\"name\":\"Karnataka HC clarifies application of Section 306 of Karnataka Municipalities Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-12T13:45:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-28T08:45:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka HC clarifies application of Section 306 of Karnataka Municipalities Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka HC clarifies application of Section 306 of Karnataka Municipalities Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka HC clarifies application of Section 306 of Karnataka Municipalities Act","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dinesh Maheshwari CJ and S. Sujatha, J. declined to exercise PIL jurisdiction in petition","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-12T13:45:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-28T08:45:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/","name":"Karnataka HC clarifies application of Section 306 of Karnataka Municipalities Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-12T13:45:41+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-28T08:45:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/12\/deputy-commissioner-can-suspend-an-order-under-section-306-of-karnataka-municipalities-act-only-if-the-same-is-unlawful-likely-to-cause-injury-to-public-or-lead-to-a-breach-of-peace\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka HC clarifies application of Section 306 of Karnataka Municipalities Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":241803,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/07\/farm-houses-in-karnataka-lacunae-in-legislation\/","url_meta":{"origin":206744,"position":0},"title":"Farm houses in Karnataka: Lacunae in Legislation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Gautamaditya Sridhara*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/farm-houses-1-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/farm-houses-1-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/farm-houses-1-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/farm-houses-1-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/farm-houses-1-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240893,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/kar-hc-interpreting-the-term-enquiry-under-s-43a-of-karnataka-panchayatraj-act-1993-court-lays-strict-emphasis-on-procedural-compliance-before-any-state-action-of-removal-petiti\/","url_meta":{"origin":206744,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC | Interpreting the term \u2018enquiry\u2019 under S. 43A of Karnataka Panchayatraj Act 1993, Court lays strict emphasis on procedural compliance before any State Action of removal; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"December 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of G. Narendar and M.I. Arun JJ., allowing the present petition, discussed the meaning, scope and ambit of the word \u2018enquiry\u2019 and provisional application of Section 43-A of the Karnataka Panchayatraj Act, 1993. Background A complaint was lodged against the petitioners before Lokayukta, on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324046,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/11\/entitlement-to-leave-encashment-is-integral-to-fundamental-rights-karnataka-high-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206744,"position":2},"title":"\u201cLeave encashment can\u2019t be viewed as discretionary bounties but as legal rights enforceable under the Constitution\u201d: Karnataka HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that entitlement to leave encashment is integral to the fundamental rights enshrined under Art. 19(1)(f) and Art. 31 of the Constitution and administrative instruction lacking the force of law cannot override constitutional protections.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216435,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/03\/kar-hc-pil-against-construction-of-hostel-building-for-girl-students-belonging-to-scheduled-caste-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":206744,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC | PIL against construction of hostel building for girl students belonging to Scheduled Caste — dismissed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: The Division Bench of Abhay S. Oka, C.J. and H.T. Narendra Prasad, J. while not going into the legal issue involved, dismissed the petition. A hostel building for girl students belonging to the Scheduled Caste was to be constructed on the order of the State Government as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":356876,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/18\/karnataka-high-court-nirmithi-kendra-public-authority-rti-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":206744,"position":4},"title":"Inside Karnataka High Court\u2019s order holding Nirmithi Kendra a Public Authority under RTI Act","author":"Editor","date":"August 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA perusal of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, would indicate that it is not only funding, but also control, which would have to be considered to determine whether it is a public authority or not.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Nirmithi Kendra","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nirmithi-Kendra.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nirmithi-Kendra.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nirmithi-Kendra.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Nirmithi-Kendra.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222145,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/kar-hc-mere-allegations-in-the-death-note-does-not-amount-to-substantial-evidence-for-conviction\/","url_meta":{"origin":206744,"position":5},"title":"Kar HC | Mere allegations in the death note does not amount to substantial evidence for conviction","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: K.N. Phaneendra, J. allowed the criminal petition filed under Section 438 of The Code for Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in the event of his arrest for the offence punishable under Section 306 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC\u2019). In the present case, the complainant\u2019s father\u2019s dead\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206744"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206744\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}