{"id":206664,"date":"2018-12-10T11:15:10","date_gmt":"2018-12-10T05:45:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206664"},"modified":"2018-12-28T12:45:53","modified_gmt":"2018-12-28T07:15:53","slug":"irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cIrrational, incongruous and bordering on facetiousness\u201d:Petition dismissed challenging collegium recommendations, 1st, 2nd &#038; 3rd Judges cases and basic structure doctrine\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Kerala High Court:<\/b> A Division Bench comprising of P.R. Ramachandra Menon and Devan Ramachandran, JJ. seized of a rather bewildering appeal primarily challenging collegium recommendations, dismissed the same for being unsubstantiated with any document or evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present writ appeal was filed challenging the order dismissing appellant\u2019s writ petition filed challenging the recommendation for elevation of certain practicing advocates as judges of this Court for reason of their proximity to some Judges, former Judges and the Advocate General. The appellant contended that the said collegium recommendations would infringe their fundamental rights.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Among the many baffling averments, the petitioner contended that the collegium system is illegal; that the judgments of Supreme Court in First, Second and Third Judges cases do not lay down the correct law and were thus being unworthy of being followed as precedents; that the basic structure theory, as postulated by the Apex Court, was a myth; and that Public Interest Litigation was being now misused.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Baffled to see the pleadings and averments on record, the Court noted that the appellant\u2019s pleadings were unsubstantiated by any evidence or details and as such it was an attempt to cast aspersions on the Collegium of Judges.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, the appeal was dismissed and exemplary costs were imposed on the appellant for approaching the Court asserting eligibility to be appointed as a Judge of a High Court, without even disclosing the rudimentary details as to when he was enrolled or his standing at the Bar.[C.J. Joveson v. Chief Justice of Kerala High Court,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/C5mW8am3\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Ker 4947<\/b><\/a>,decided on 16-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.R. Ramachandra Menon and Devan Ramachandran, JJ. seized of a rather bewildering appeal primarily <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32788,32789],"class_list":["post-206664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-basic-structure-doctrine","tag-collegium-recommendations"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u201cIrrational, incongruous and bordering on facetiousness\u201d:Petition dismissed challenging collegium recommendations, 1st, 2nd &amp; 3rd Judges cases and basic structure doctrine\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cIrrational, incongruous and bordering on facetiousness\u201d:Petition dismissed challenging collegium recommendations, 1st, 2nd &amp; 3rd Judges cases and basic structure doctrine\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.R. Ramachandra Menon and Devan Ramachandran, JJ. seized of a rather bewildering appeal primarily\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-10T05:45:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-28T07:15:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/\",\"name\":\"\u201cIrrational, incongruous and bordering on facetiousness\u201d:Petition dismissed challenging collegium recommendations, 1st, 2nd & 3rd Judges cases and basic structure doctrine\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-10T05:45:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-28T07:15:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cIrrational, incongruous and bordering on facetiousness\u201d:Petition dismissed challenging collegium recommendations, 1st, 2nd &#038; 3rd Judges cases and basic structure doctrine\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u201cIrrational, incongruous and bordering on facetiousness\u201d:Petition dismissed challenging collegium recommendations, 1st, 2nd & 3rd Judges cases and basic structure doctrine\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cIrrational, incongruous and bordering on facetiousness\u201d:Petition dismissed challenging collegium recommendations, 1st, 2nd & 3rd Judges cases and basic structure doctrine\u00a0","og_description":"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.R. Ramachandra Menon and Devan Ramachandran, JJ. seized of a rather bewildering appeal primarily","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-10T05:45:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-28T07:15:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/","name":"\u201cIrrational, incongruous and bordering on facetiousness\u201d:Petition dismissed challenging collegium recommendations, 1st, 2nd & 3rd Judges cases and basic structure doctrine\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-10T05:45:10+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-28T07:15:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/10\/irrational-incongruous-and-bordering-on-facetiousness-kerala-hc-dismisses-petition-challenging-collegium-recommendations-1st-2nd-3rd-judges-cases-and-basic-structure-doctrine\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cIrrational, incongruous and bordering on facetiousness\u201d:Petition dismissed challenging collegium recommendations, 1st, 2nd &#038; 3rd Judges cases and basic structure doctrine\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":110851,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/02\/appeal-challenging-collegium-recommendations-devoid-of-merit-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":206664,"position":0},"title":"Appeal challenging Collegium recommendations devoid of merit: Delhi High Court","author":"Saba","date":"March 2, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Mr. R.P. Luthra, \u00a0a practising advocate had filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging the recommendation of four names by the Supreme Court Collegium in May, 2016 and certain other reliefs including a declaration that the judgments passed by the Supreme Court from time to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":59271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/01\/petition-dealing-with-challenge-to-collegium-system-remitted-to-be-reconsidered-afresh-on-maintainability\/","url_meta":{"origin":206664,"position":1},"title":"Petition dealing with challenge to collegium system remitted, to be reconsidered afresh on maintainability","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Deciding the appeal\u00a0 preferred against the Single Judge's order in an un-numbered writ petition challenging the collegium system of appointment of Judges, the Division Bench of Abdul Rehim and Sudheendra Kumar, JJ.\u00a0 remitted the matter back for fresh consideration on the question of maintainability. The Registry of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":331246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/20\/appointment-of-judges-reiterated-recommendations-sc-seeks-reasons-for-note-clearing-names-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206664,"position":2},"title":"Appointment of Judges | SC seeks list of reiterated Collegium recommendations; Asks reasons for not clearing the appointments","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court was hearing a PIL seeking directions for the Union Government clear the Collegium recommendations. The Court is also due to hear a contempt petition filed by State of Jharkhand vis-a-vis delay in clearing the transfer of Justice MS Ramachandra Rao, for appointment as next Chief Justice of Jharkhand\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Appointment of Judges Collegium recommendations","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Appointment-of-Judges-Collegium-recommendations.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Appointment-of-Judges-Collegium-recommendations.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Appointment-of-Judges-Collegium-recommendations.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Appointment-of-Judges-Collegium-recommendations.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323357,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/01\/del-hc-dismisses-pil-seeking-transparency-judicial-appointment-process-publicity-interest-litigation-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206664,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Purely a Publicity Interest Litigation\u2019; Delhi High Court dismisses PIL seeking transparency in Judicial Appointment Process","author":"Arunima","date":"June 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The only personal interest of the Petitioner as stated in the petition is that the Petitioner has a case pending in Rohini District Court, Delhi. This Court is at a loss to understand how the delay in disposal of his case in the District Court is anyway connected to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":360289,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/16\/sc-collegium-recommends-appointing-9-judges-in-4-hcs\/","url_meta":{"origin":206664,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of 9 Judges for 4 High Courts","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court Collegium led by CJI B.R. Gavai issued several resolutions making recommendations for appointment of Advocates and Judicial Officers as Judges and appointing Additional Judges and Permanent Judges.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"appointing 9 Judges in 4 HCs","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/appointing-9-Judges-in-4-HCs.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/appointing-9-Judges-in-4-HCs.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/appointing-9-Judges-in-4-HCs.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/appointing-9-Judges-in-4-HCs.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325793,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/05\/delhi-hc-dismisses-appeal-filed-for-lack-of-appointment-of-judges-to-high-courts-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206664,"position":5},"title":"Delhi HC dismisses appeal filed for lack of appointment of judges to the High Courts","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court said that the directions sought were not only beyond but also contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206664"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206664\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}