{"id":206420,"date":"2018-12-07T17:01:55","date_gmt":"2018-12-07T11:31:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206420"},"modified":"2018-12-12T14:00:02","modified_gmt":"2018-12-12T08:30:02","slug":"an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/","title":{"rendered":"An order of preventive detention cannot be passed against a person who is already in police custody"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu &amp; Kashmir\u00a0High Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench of Rashid Ali Dar, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of respondent authorities, whereby petitioner was taken into preventive custody and lodged in Central Jail, Kotebhalwal, Jammu.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The main issue that arose before the Court was whether an order of preventive detention can be passed while the accused is already in police custody.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that as per the judgment of <em>Sama Aruna v. State of Telangana<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/KPnHEaoF\">(2018) 12 SCC 150<\/a>, it is a settled proposition of law that a person cannot be taken into preventive detention while he is already in police custody. In that case, the Supreme Court had held that an order of preventive detention cannot be passed against an accused while considering a stale incident which took place a long time ago. The Court further observed that it was incumbent on the part of the person, who did the exercise of handing over the documents and conveying the contents thereof to the detenu, to file an affidavit in order to attach a semblance of fairness to his actions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that the respondents in the instant matter had placed the petitioner under preventive detention while he was already in police custody; this action on the part of respondents is unjustified. Further, the respondents did not even supply the material to the petitioner, which formed the basis of the order of preventive detention. Resultantly, the petition was allowed and the order of preventive detention was quashed.[Farooq Ahmad Bhat v. State of J&amp;K,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/h35JVKRT\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 924<\/b><\/a>, order dated 01-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu &amp; Kashmir\u00a0High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Rashid Ali Dar, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of respondent <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30320,30521,3117,32779],"class_list":["post-206420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-order","tag-police-custody","tag-Preventive_Detention","tag-supply-material"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>An order of preventive detention cannot be passed against a person who is already in police custody | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"An order of preventive detention cannot be passed against a person who is already in police custody\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu &amp; Kashmir\u00a0High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Rashid Ali Dar, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of respondent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-07T11:31:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-12T08:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/\",\"name\":\"An order of preventive detention cannot be passed against a person who is already in police custody | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-07T11:31:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-12T08:30:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"An order of preventive detention cannot be passed against a person who is already in police custody\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"An order of preventive detention cannot be passed against a person who is already in police custody | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"An order of preventive detention cannot be passed against a person who is already in police custody","og_description":"Jammu &amp; Kashmir\u00a0High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Rashid Ali Dar, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of respondent","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-07T11:31:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-12T08:30:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/","name":"An order of preventive detention cannot be passed against a person who is already in police custody | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-07T11:31:55+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-12T08:30:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-cannot-be-passed-against-a-person-who-is-already-in-police-custody\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"An order of preventive detention cannot be passed against a person who is already in police custody"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":217211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/jk-hc-preventive-detention-of-a-person-who-is-already-in-custody-of-state-in-connection-with-commission-of-offence-under-substantive-law-must-not-be-ordered\/","url_meta":{"origin":206420,"position":0},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Preventive detention of a person who is already in custody of State in connection with commission of offence under substantive law must not be ordered","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Rashid Ali Dar, J. allowed a habeas corpus petition and quashed detention order of a person who had been under Section 3 of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. (hereinafter \u201cthe Act\u201d). Petitioner herein (detenue) was supplying 50\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214835,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/j-detention-order-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":206420,"position":1},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Preventive detention order when accused already in custody cuts down the roots of State Act affecting the course of legal procedure; detention order quashed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: In this petition filed before Rashid Ali Dar, J., an order passed by District Magistrate, Baramulla was challenged whereby detenu was ordered to be taken into preventive custody under Section 8 of the J&K Public Safety Act. Petitioner\u2019s custody in the police for the offences\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202965,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/law-of-preventive-detention-a-tool-to-be-used-sparingly\/","url_meta":{"origin":206420,"position":2},"title":"Law of preventive detention: A tool to be used sparingly","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of H.K. Hanjura, J., allowed a Writ Petition filed against the order of detention passed by the respondent authorities. The petitioner was already in custody in connection with a criminal case and this formed the basis for passing of a detention\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216115,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/26\/jk-hc-preventive-detention-an-invasion-to-personal-liberty-guaranteed-under-article-21-therefore-order-must-be-passed-after-following-procedural-safeguards\/","url_meta":{"origin":206420,"position":3},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Preventive detention: An invasion to personal liberty guaranteed under Art. 21 \u2013 therefore order must be passed after following procedural safeguards","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Rashid Ali Dar, J. set aside the detention order passed by respondent 2-District Magistrate, Baramulla and ordered the detenu to be released from preventive custody. In the present case, the petitioner had challenged a detention order passed by respondent 2 whereby the petitioner was taken\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":247940,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/08\/jk-hc-non-application-of-mind-by-detaining-authority-is-fatal-hc-sets-aside-order-of-preventive-detention-for-alleged-involvement-in-militant-activities\/","url_meta":{"origin":206420,"position":4},"title":"J&#038;K HC| \u201cNon-application of mind by detaining authority is fatal\u201d HC sets aside order of preventive detention for alleged involvement in militant activities","author":"Editor","date":"May 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J. heard the instant petition against the impugned order passed by District Magistrate (the detaining authority), by which the petitioner had been detained in preventive detention to preventing him from indulging in the activities which were prejudicial to the security of Union Territory.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":220155,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/27\/jk-hc-preventive-detention-quashed-for-non-supplying-of-the-material-relied-upon-by-detaining-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":206420,"position":5},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Preventive detention quashed for non-supplying of the material relied upon by detaining authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. quashed the detention order of Masood Ahmad Bhat while directing for his release from the preventive custody. Denetu, Masood Ahmad Bhat, sought quashing of detention order dated 22-01-2019. The grounds of which the detention order was challenged were as follows: No\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206420"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206420\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}