{"id":206368,"date":"2018-12-07T11:18:19","date_gmt":"2018-12-07T05:48:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206368"},"modified":"2018-12-18T15:43:30","modified_gmt":"2018-12-18T10:13:30","slug":"revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of G. Narendar, J. hearing a civil writ petition set aside the order of revenue authority passed after 30 years, ruling that the said power was exercised after a lapse of a long time and hence was unreasonable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present matter pertained to mutation of revenue entries for a property by revenue authorities, suit in relation to which was pending in the court of Civil Judge, Nelamangala. Despite pendency of the suit in a lower court, the Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore rural district directed mutation of names of respondents 4 to 10 in the revenue records pursuant to registration of sale deed in 1977. The said order was confirmed by Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore district. The instant petition was filed for quashing of the order of Deputy Commissioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court noted that admittedly, the suit pending in lower court was instituted prior to the passing of orders by the Assistant Commissioner and the Deputy Commissioner. Relying on its judgment in <em>S. Shivanna v. Tehsildar, Bangalore North Taluk, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1H7bxDq7\">2005 SCC OnLine Kar 604<\/a>\u00a0the \u00a0High Court allowed the petition holding that the impugned orders were vitiated on the ground that the said power had been exercised after an extraordinary and unexplained delay of around 30 years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, revenue courts ought not to adjudicate rights with regard to the immovable property once the dispute is seized of by a civil court. The impugned order of revenue authorities was set aside and they were directed to enter details of pending suit in the records which would be deleted after disposal of the suit.\u00a0[Prakash v. Dy. Commr. Bangalore Rural District,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/H1b3BLKw\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Kar 2282<\/b><\/a>, decided on 15-11-2018]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of G. Narendar, J. hearing a civil writ petition set aside the order of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[10551,31854,32769,30459,32770],"class_list":["post-206368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-civil-court","tag-immovable-property","tag-revenue-courts","tag-sale-deed","tag-seized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of G. Narendar, J. hearing a civil writ petition set aside the order of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-07T05:48:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-18T10:13:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/07\\\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/07\\\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-07T05:48:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-18T10:13:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/07\\\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":298,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"civil court\",\"Immovable Property\",\"Revenue Courts\",\"sale deed\",\"Seized\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/07\\\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/07\\\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/07\\\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\\\/\",\"name\":\"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-07T05:48:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-18T10:13:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/07\\\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/07\\\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/07\\\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of G. Narendar, J. hearing a civil writ petition set aside the order of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-07T05:48:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-18T10:13:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC","datePublished":"2018-12-07T05:48:19+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-18T10:13:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/"},"wordCount":298,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["civil court","Immovable Property","Revenue Courts","sale deed","Seized"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/","name":"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-07T05:48:19+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-18T10:13:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/07\/revenue-courts-must-not-adjudicate-rights-pertaining-to-immovable-property-once-the-lis-in-relation-thereto-is-seized-of-by-a-civil-court-karnataka-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Revenue Courts must not adjudicate rights pertaining to immovable property once the lis in relation thereto is seized of by a civil court: Karnataka HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":213466,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/mp-hc-orders-passed-by-the-revenue-authority-not-binding-on-civil-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":206368,"position":0},"title":"MP HC | Orders passed by the Revenue Authority not binding on Civil Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This petition was filed before the Bench of Vivek Rusia, J. Facts of the case were such that petitioners are daughters of respondent who had sold his property to other respondents. After the sale was concluded one of the respondent to whom the property was sold\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":298227,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/01\/validity-of-registered-sale-deed-to-be-decided-only-by-civil-court-manipur-hc-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":206368,"position":1},"title":"Validity of Registered Sale Deed to be decided only by Civil Court and not Revenue Court: Manipur HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"August 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"At the time of mutation proceedings, the competent authority must examine the manner of acquisition of the title.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"manipur high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/manipur-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216796,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/mp-hc-high-courts-power-of-superintendence-under-art-227-not-curtailed-by-any-statute-as-it-is-a-part-of-the-basic-structure\/","url_meta":{"origin":206368,"position":2},"title":"MP HC | High Court&#8217;s power of superintendence under Art. 227 not curtailed by any statute as it is a part of the basic structure","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A miscellaneous petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was allowed by Sanjay Dwivedi, J., where the petitioner challenged the order passed by Additional Commissioner under revenue proceedings. In the instant petition, the respondent raised an objection that the petition was not maintainable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293824,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/05\/supreme-courts-decision-on-stamp-duty-liability-in-immovable-property-sale-deeds-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206368,"position":3},"title":"Explained| Supreme Court&#8217;s decision on Liability for payment of Stamp Duty in Immovable Property Sale Deeds","author":"Editor","date":"June 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court ruled that the value of the plant and machinery must be considered and ascertained for payment of stamp duty on sale deeds.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"stamp duty liability for sale deed","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/stamp-duty-liability-for-sale-deed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/stamp-duty-liability-for-sale-deed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/stamp-duty-liability-for-sale-deed.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/stamp-duty-liability-for-sale-deed.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293608,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/01\/land-dispute-with-state-supreme-court-remands-back-matter-to-high-court-for-entirety-of-documents-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206368,"position":4},"title":"Confusing facts; unanswered issues: SC asks Allahabad HC to decide long drawn land dispute between State and Private parties within a year","author":"Ridhi","date":"June 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The saga of twists and turns in facts of the matter starting with a lease deed, revenue entries, compensation, expunction orders, and what not? The series of developments over the past 100 years of suit land even cautioned the Supreme Court from deciding the matter casually.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"land dispute","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/land-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/land-dispute.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/land-dispute.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/land-dispute.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206136,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/when-a-sale-deed-is-cancelled-the-revenue-entry-prior-to-it-revives-leaving-no-room-for-further-declaration-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":206368,"position":5},"title":"When a sale deed is cancelled the revenue entry prior to it revives leaving no room for further declaration: Allahabad HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anjani Kumar Mishra, J. dismissed an appeal being devoid of merits. The appellant has alleged that he met with an accident and got fractured and subsequently the defendant mislead him by obtained his signature by fraud on the pretext of awarding\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206368"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206368\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}