{"id":206319,"date":"2018-12-06T10:17:51","date_gmt":"2018-12-06T04:47:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206319"},"modified":"2018-12-07T18:51:23","modified_gmt":"2018-12-07T13:21:23","slug":"fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/","title":{"rendered":"FIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Deshmukh and Swapna Joshi, JJ. partly allowed an application filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash and set aside FIR registered against the applications under Section 498-A read with Section 34 IPC.<\/p>\n

Eleven applications, in this case, included the husband, father-in-law and other relatives of the husband of the non-applicant wife. She had alleged that she was harassed by the applicants in as much as she was abused by them. Specific allegations were levelled against the husband, father-in-law and two others that she was repeatedly asked by her husband to establish physical relations with the other three. The applicants contended that no offence was made out against them even if the allegations in FIR were accepted at face value.<\/p>\n

On a bare perusal of FIR, the High Court noted that the wife had made serious allegations against her husband, father-in-law and two others. However, the FIR did not reveal any specific allegation against other relatives particularly her mother-in-law and sisters-in-law. Relying on the case of\u00a0State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal,\u00a0<\/em>1992 Supp (1) SCC 335<\/a>, the Court held that continuation of proceedings against applicants except for the husband, father-in-law and two others would be an abuse of process of law. Therefore, the FIR in regard to such other relatives was directed to be quashed. [Chandrahas Jagatnarayan Choube v. State of Maharashtra,2018 SCC OnLine Bom 5574<\/b><\/a>, decided on 30-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Deshmukh and Swapna Joshi, JJ. partly allowed an application filed under Section 482 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[22274,3067,11791,31299],"class_list":["post-206319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abuse-of-process-of-law","tag-FIR","tag-section-438-crpc","tag-section-498-a-ipc"],"yoast_head":"\nFIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"FIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Deshmukh and Swapna Joshi, JJ. partly allowed an application filed under Section 482\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-06T04:47:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-07T13:21:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"FIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-06T04:47:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-07T13:21:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":251,\"commentCount\":2,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Abuse of process of law\",\"FIR\",\"Section 438 CrPC\",\"Section 498-A IPC\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/\",\"name\":\"FIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-06T04:47:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-07T13:21:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/12\\\/06\\\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"FIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"FIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"FIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law","og_description":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of P.N. Deshmukh and Swapna Joshi, JJ. partly allowed an application filed under Section 482","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-06T04:47:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-07T13:21:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"FIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law","datePublished":"2018-12-06T04:47:51+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-07T13:21:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/"},"wordCount":251,"commentCount":2,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","keywords":["Abuse of process of law","FIR","Section 438 CrPC","Section 498-A IPC"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/","name":"FIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2018-12-06T04:47:51+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-07T13:21:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/fir-under-section-498-a-ipc-against-mother-in-law-and-sisters-in-law-quashed-for-being-abuse-of-process-of-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"FIR under Section 498-A IPC against mother-in-law and sisters-in-law quashed for being abuse of process of law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206319"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206319\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}