{"id":206251,"date":"2018-12-05T09:40:39","date_gmt":"2018-12-05T04:10:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206251"},"modified":"2018-12-05T12:33:23","modified_gmt":"2018-12-05T07:03:23","slug":"refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Refusal to accept alternative job on same pay scale is &#8220;abandonment of service&#8221;: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. disposed of an appeal seeking enhanced severance package wherein the order passed by Delhi High Court was modified.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant worked as Senior Confidential Secretary to Senior Manager (North India) of HSBC Bank. In May 2005, the post became redundant as the said officer left the services of the Bank. Pursuant thereto, the appellant was offered four alternative jobs in the same pay scale. The appellant admitted that she declined to accept any of these jobs. Consequently, the Bank issued a letter terminating her services. In lieu thereof, a compensation amount of Rs 8,17,071 was paid to her. The appellant raised an industrial dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 seeking enhancement of severance package. This was opposed by the Bank. The litigation continued and it was an admitted fact that the appellant had received a total amount of Rs 1,07,73,736 under various heads. During the course of litigation, the Delhi High Court had held that she had abandoned her job and therefore the amount she had received was 13 times her legal entitlement. She was directed to return the amount received in excess of Rs 8,17,071 minus litigation expenses and amount received under Section 17-B of ID Act. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant preferred the instant appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Supreme Court perused the record and was of the view that the Bank was justified in terminating services of the appellant. Referring to\u00a0<em>Vijay S. Sathaye v. Indian Airlines Ltd.,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/SSyy9ye4\">(2013) 10 SCC 253<\/a>, the Court held that intention of the appellant could be inferred from her refusal to accept any of the four alternative positions offered to her. Also, the claims raised by her were only for enhancement of compensation and not for re-instatement in service. The Court held that this conduct constituted a voluntary abandonment of service, therefore she could not have been in &#8220;continuous service&#8221; as defined under Section 2(oo) of ID Act and hence, Section 25 of ID Act cease to apply on her. On facts of the case, it was held that the amount already received by the appellant may be treated as the final settlement of all her claims. The appeal was accordingly disposed of. [Manju Saxena v. Union of India,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Ag1Yc212\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine SC 2659<\/b><\/a>, decided on 03-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. disposed of an appeal seeking enhanced severance package wherein the order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[32712,32713,32714,12791],"class_list":["post-206251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-abandonment-of-service","tag-continuous-service","tag-final-settlement","tag-pay-scale"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Refusal to accept alternative job on same pay scale is &quot;abandonment of service&quot;: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Refusal to accept alternative job on same pay scale is &quot;abandonment of service&quot;: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. disposed of an appeal seeking enhanced severance package wherein the order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-05T04:10:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-05T07:03:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Refusal to accept alternative job on same pay scale is \\\"abandonment of service\\\": SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-05T04:10:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-05T07:03:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Refusal to accept alternative job on same pay scale is &#8220;abandonment of service&#8221;: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Refusal to accept alternative job on same pay scale is \"abandonment of service\": SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Refusal to accept alternative job on same pay scale is \"abandonment of service\": SC","og_description":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. disposed of an appeal seeking enhanced severance package wherein the order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-05T04:10:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-05T07:03:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/","name":"Refusal to accept alternative job on same pay scale is \"abandonment of service\": SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-12-05T04:10:39+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-05T07:03:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/05\/refusal-to-accept-alternative-job-on-same-pay-scale-is-abandonment-of-service-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Refusal to accept alternative job on same pay scale is &#8220;abandonment of service&#8221;: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":328601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/13\/decision-reduction-employee-pay-scale-money-recovery-retrospective-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206251,"position":0},"title":"Decision to reduce employee\u2019s pay scale and recover excess amount can\u2019t be applied retrospectively after a long time gap: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court further stated that any step of reduction in the pay scale and recovery from a government employee would be like a punitive action because the same has drastic civil and evil consequences.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"employee pay scale reduction long time gap","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/employee-pay-scale-reduction-long-time-gap.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/employee-pay-scale-reduction-long-time-gap.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/employee-pay-scale-reduction-long-time-gap.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/employee-pay-scale-reduction-long-time-gap.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":264768,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/31\/refusal-to-continue-to-execute-a-contract-unless-reciprocal-promises-are-performed-by-the-other-party-is-not-abandonment-of-contract-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":206251,"position":1},"title":"Refusal to continue to execute a contract unless reciprocal promises are performed by the other party is not abandonment of contract: SC\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the law on abandonment on contractual obligation, the bench of Hemant Gupta and V. Ramasubramanian*, JJ has held that the refusal of a contractor to continue to execute the work, unless the reciprocal promises are performed by the other party, cannot be termed as abandonment of contract.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Refusal-to-continue-to-execute-a-contract-unless-reciprocal-promises-are-performed-by-the-other-party-is-not-abandonment-of-contract.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Refusal-to-continue-to-execute-a-contract-unless-reciprocal-promises-are-performed-by-the-other-party-is-not-abandonment-of-contract.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Refusal-to-continue-to-execute-a-contract-unless-reciprocal-promises-are-performed-by-the-other-party-is-not-abandonment-of-contract.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Refusal-to-continue-to-execute-a-contract-unless-reciprocal-promises-are-performed-by-the-other-party-is-not-abandonment-of-contract.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Refusal-to-continue-to-execute-a-contract-unless-reciprocal-promises-are-performed-by-the-other-party-is-not-abandonment-of-contract.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":285221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/25\/classification-of-posts-and-determination-of-pay-structure-falls-within-exclusive-domain-of-executive-judicial-courts-and-tribunals-cannot-interfere-supreme-court-reiterates-legal-news-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":206251,"position":2},"title":"Classification of posts and determination of pay structure falls within Executive&#8217;s exclusive domain, Courts and Tribunals should not interfere; Supreme Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"February 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe wisdom and advisability of the Courts in the matters concerning the finance, are ordinarily not amenable to judicial review unless a gross case of arbitrariness or unfairness is established by the aggrieved party.\u201d, observed Supreme Court","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-537.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-537.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-537.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-537.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348820,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/27\/non-disclosure-past-govt-service-no-ground-for-discharge-woman-civil-judge-reinstated-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":206251,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Non-disclosure of past government service can\u2019t be a ground for discharge\u2019: Supreme Court reinstates woman Civil Judge","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court emphasised on the necessity of women\u2019s participation in the judiciary and said that country will greatly benefit from a judicial force that is competent, committed and most importantly, diverse.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"woman civil judge past govt service","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/woman-civil-judge-past-govt-service.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/woman-civil-judge-past-govt-service.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/woman-civil-judge-past-govt-service.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/woman-civil-judge-past-govt-service.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301639,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/16\/p-e-library-personnel-karnataka-govt-grade-colleges-drawing-1996-ugc-pay-scales-entitled-other-govt-benefits-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":206251,"position":4},"title":"Physical education and Library Personnel in Karnataka Government Grade Colleges drawing UGC pay scales of 1996 entitled to other government benefits: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court expressed that since the benefit was granted in further cases, the appellants could not be denied the same. However, the directions for application of instant judgment were kept very specific by the Court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"1996 ugc pay scale","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1996-ugc-pay-scale.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1996-ugc-pay-scale.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1996-ugc-pay-scale.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1996-ugc-pay-scale.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":251384,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/16\/retiral-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":206251,"position":5},"title":"SC | \u2018Rakshak\u2019 in Railway Protection Force, out of employment for a failure to prevent alleged theft. Read whether SC allows back wages and retiral benefits to him","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of L. Nageswara Rao and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ., gave relief to the appellant by directing that he be paid back wages as specified with continuity in service. In the instant matter, appellant was appointed as \u2018Rakshak\u2019 in the Railway Protection Force. Further, it was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206251"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206251\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}