{"id":206190,"date":"2018-12-04T10:00:22","date_gmt":"2018-12-04T04:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206190"},"modified":"2018-12-05T11:21:09","modified_gmt":"2018-12-05T05:51:09","slug":"brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Brevity must be observed while expressing opinion; remarks passed against unnecessarily lengthy judgment of H.P. High Court: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. while upholding a judgment passed by Himachal Pradesh High Court showed displeasure at it being unnecessarily lengthy.<\/p>\n

The Court was deciding appeals filed against the order of the High Court whereby it had allowed revision petitions filed by respondents. Having heard the appellants, the Court found no good reason to interfere in the order impugned because the High Court had only remanded the matter back to First Appellate Court to decide the matter afresh in accordance with law. The Supreme Court was of the opinion that in the facts of the case, the appeals could not be allowed and the same were dismissed.<\/p>\n

Before parting with the matter, the Court observed, “having rightly formed an opinion to remand the case to the First Appellate Court, there was no need for the High Court to devote 60 pages in writing the impugned order.” In Court’s view, it was not required. Further, “examination could be confined only to the issue of remand and not beyond it.\u00a0 At the same time, there was no need to cite several decisions and that too in detail. Brevity being a virtue, it must be observed as far as possible while expressing an opinion.” [Surjeet Singh v. Sadhu Singh,2018 SCC OnLine SC 2658<\/b><\/a>, decided on 03-12-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. while upholding a judgment passed by Himachal Pradesh High Court showed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[32702,32703,7191],"class_list":["post-206190","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-brevity","tag-lengthy-judgment","tag-opinion"],"yoast_head":"\nBrevity must be observed while expressing opinion; remarks passed against unnecessarily lengthy judgment of H.P. High Court: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Brevity must be observed while expressing opinion; remarks passed against unnecessarily lengthy judgment of H.P. High Court: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. while upholding a judgment passed by Himachal Pradesh High Court showed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-04T04:30:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-05T05:51:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Brevity must be observed while expressing opinion; remarks passed against unnecessarily lengthy judgment of H.P. High Court: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-04T04:30:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-05T05:51:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Brevity must be observed while expressing opinion; remarks passed against unnecessarily lengthy judgment of H.P. High Court: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Brevity must be observed while expressing opinion; remarks passed against unnecessarily lengthy judgment of H.P. High Court: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Brevity must be observed while expressing opinion; remarks passed against unnecessarily lengthy judgment of H.P. High Court: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. while upholding a judgment passed by Himachal Pradesh High Court showed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-04T04:30:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-05T05:51:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/","name":"Brevity must be observed while expressing opinion; remarks passed against unnecessarily lengthy judgment of H.P. High Court: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-12-04T04:30:22+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-05T05:51:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/brevity-must-be-observed-while-expressing-opinion-remarks-passed-against-unnecessarily-lengthy-judgment-of-h-p-high-court-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Brevity must be observed while expressing opinion; remarks passed against unnecessarily lengthy judgment of H.P. High Court: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":206192,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/accused-found-in-possession-of-manufacture-drug-can-be-tried-under-ndps-act-in-place-of-drugs-and-cosmetics-act-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":206190,"position":0},"title":"Accused found in possession of “manufactured drug” can be tried under NDPS Act in place of Drugs and Cosmetics Act: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana, M.M. Shantanagoudar and M.R. Shah, JJ. allowed a set of appeals filed against the common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court whereby it had allowed\u00a0application for suspension of sentence preferred by accused persons and directed them to be released on bail.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282178,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/23\/supreme-court-sets-aside-madras-high-courts-sentence-in-section-138-ni-act-modifies-decree\/","url_meta":{"origin":206190,"position":1},"title":"Section 138 NI Act| Supreme Court sets aside Madras High Court’s reversal of acquittal in a cheque bouncing case","author":"Editor","date":"January 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that the scope of interference in an appeal against acquittal is limited and that the Madras High Court \u2018could not have interfered with the finding of acquittal recorded by the learned Trial Court.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-164.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":289300,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/12\/sc-upholds-dismissal-of-civil-judge-for-pronouncing-unprepared-judgments-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":206190,"position":2},"title":"Pronouncing unprepared judgments is gross negligence and callousness of Judicial Officer; SC upholds Civil Judge’s dismissal","author":"Editor","date":"April 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court upheld the penalty of dismissal of Civil Judge and said that providing an unprepared judgment, fait accompli, is completely unacceptable and unbecoming of a Judicial Officer.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Dismissal of Civil Judge","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1094.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1094.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1094.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1094.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252087,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/31\/encashment-of-bank-guarantee-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":206190,"position":3},"title":"SC | Is there a scope for interference in case of encashment of bank guarantee? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta, JJ., while addressing the present matter, remarked that: Fate of a suit against encashment of bank guarantee still hangs in balance after almost two decades! Respondent 1 preferred an appeal before the Additional District Judge and the appellate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-13.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290342,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/22\/sc-sets-aside-bombay-hc-order-acquitting-gn-saibaba-from-uapa-charges-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":206190,"position":4},"title":"Explained| Why SC sets aside Bombay HC order acquitting Prof GN Saibaba and others in UAPA Case","author":"Editor","date":"April 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court directed to remit the matter back for fresh disposal before another bench of the High Court.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"professor g n saibaba","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/professor-g-n-saibaba.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/professor-g-n-saibaba.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/professor-g-n-saibaba.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/professor-g-n-saibaba.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202889,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/30\/sc-archives-when-sc-reversed-hc-order-for-incomprehensible-content\/","url_meta":{"origin":206190,"position":5},"title":"SC Archives| When SC reversed HC order for \u201cincomprehensible content\u201d","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A special leave petition was filed before a Division Bench comprising of Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, JJ.\u00a0 against the judgment of H.P. High Court in a landlord-tenant dispute. The Hon\u2019ble Bench found the judgment impugned to be incomprehensible and therefore set aside the judgment. The High\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206190","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206190"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206190\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}