{"id":206140,"date":"2018-12-03T15:30:56","date_gmt":"2018-12-03T10:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206140"},"modified":"2018-12-04T16:33:54","modified_gmt":"2018-12-04T11:03:54","slug":"scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Scope of interference by a writ court in decision of a lower forum &#8212; limited to the extent of assessing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench comprising of Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Sindhu Sharma, JJ. ruled that a joint reading of Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 103 of the Constitution of State of Jammu &amp; Kashmir leads to the conclusion that a writ court has a limited scope of interference in orders of a lower forum.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Petitioners along with one Naseema Bibi had booked tickets for travel to Delhi but were refused to board by the respondent airlines on the ground that Naseema Bibi was suffering from a serious disease and did not have a medical certificate certifying her fitness to travel on the airlines.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A complaint was filed by aggrieved petitioners before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum urging that Naseema Bibi was not subjected to any medical examination by respondents and thus their decision was without any reasonable cause. It was also stated that respondent\u2019s action had prevented timely medical treatment of Naseema Bibi in Delhi which caused her death. As such, a compensation of Rs 4.5 lakhs was claimed by the petitioners. District forum awarded Rs 30,000 as compensation on the ground that while respondent\u2019s refusal for boarding to Naseema Bibi was justified, refusal for petitioners was arbitrary. Petitioners challenged payment of meager compensation amount awarded by the District forum.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court relied on dictum in <em>Heinz India Private Limited v. State of Uttar Pradesh, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/xEifjazd\">(2012) 5 SCC 443<\/a> and observed that a court exercising writ jurisdiction does not sit as a court of appeal but has to see only whether the process of arriving at a decision has been correctly followed or not. Since the order of State Commission was based on the testimony of witnesses and the case set up by petitioners, there was no perversity in its order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, the petition was dismissed.[Abdul Karim Tantray v. Go Airlines (India) (P) Ltd.,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/51WN7gq0\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 868<\/b><\/a>, decided on 16-10-2018]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Sindhu Sharma, JJ. ruled that a joint reading <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32693,32691,32692,32552],"class_list":["post-206140","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-limited-scope","tag-lower-forum","tag-section-103-of-the-constitution-of-state-of-jammu-kashmir","tag-writ-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Scope of interference by a writ court in decision of a lower forum -- limited to the extent of assessing | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Scope of interference by a writ court in decision of a lower forum -- limited to the extent of assessing\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Sindhu Sharma, JJ. ruled that a joint reading\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-03T10:00:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-04T11:03:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/\",\"name\":\"Scope of interference by a writ court in decision of a lower forum -- limited to the extent of assessing | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-03T10:00:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-04T11:03:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Scope of interference by a writ court in decision of a lower forum &#8212; limited to the extent of assessing\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Scope of interference by a writ court in decision of a lower forum -- limited to the extent of assessing | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Scope of interference by a writ court in decision of a lower forum -- limited to the extent of assessing","og_description":"Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Sindhu Sharma, JJ. ruled that a joint reading","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-03T10:00:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-04T11:03:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/","name":"Scope of interference by a writ court in decision of a lower forum -- limited to the extent of assessing | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-03T10:00:56+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-04T11:03:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/03\/scope-of-interference-by-a-writ-court-in-decision-of-a-lower-forum-limited-to-the-extent-of-assessing-if-due-process-was-followed-in-arriving-at-impugned-decision\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Scope of interference by a writ court in decision of a lower forum &#8212; limited to the extent of assessing"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298202,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/01\/know-your-judge-andhra-pradesh-high-court-chief-justice-dhiraj-singh-thakur\/","url_meta":{"origin":206140,"position":0},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur: 5th Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh High Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"August 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"After completing his LLB, Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur joined the chambers of his brother and former Chief Justice of India, Justice T.S. Thakur. On 28-07-2023, Justice D.S. Thakur was sworn in as 5th Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh High Court (estd. on 26-12-2018).","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"justice dhiraj singh thakur","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/justice-dhiraj-singh-thakur.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/justice-dhiraj-singh-thakur.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/justice-dhiraj-singh-thakur.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/justice-dhiraj-singh-thakur.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":170254,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/22\/court-may-convert-civil-revision-petition-s-104-constitution-state-jammu-kashmir-deems-fit\/","url_meta":{"origin":206140,"position":1},"title":"Court may convert a civil revision into petition under S. 104 of the Constitution of State of Jammu and Kashmir, if it deems it fit to do so","author":"Saba","date":"November 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: The Court recently addressed a civil revision\/petition filed under Section 104 of the Constitution of State of Jammu and Kashmir wherein the petitioners sought to quash two previous judgments dated 9\/9\/2013 and 24\/7\/2012. The learned counsel for the respondent argued that a civil revision that\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":227750,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/01\/mha-notifies-jammu-and-kashmir-reorganisation-removal-of-difficulties-order-2020\/","url_meta":{"origin":206140,"position":2},"title":"MHA notifies &#8212; Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2020","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"S.O. 1233(E).\u2014WHEREAS, the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (34 of 2019) (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act) received the assent of the President on the 9th day of August 2019 and notified in the Official Gazette on the same day; AND WHEREAS, the 31st day of October, 2019\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":300832,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/supreme-court-constitution-bench-reserves-verdict-on-article-370-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206140,"position":3},"title":"Abrogation of Article 370 | Supreme Court Constitution Bench reserves verdict","author":"Editor","date":"September 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The hearing of the matter began on 02-08-2023 and was concluded on 05-09-2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"article 370","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/article-370.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/01\/application-seeking-condonation-of-delay-must-meet-the-test-of-section-5-of-the-jammu-kashmir-limitation-samvat-1995-and-satisfy-the-court-with-sufficient-cause-for-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":206140,"position":4},"title":"Application seeking condonation of delay must meet the test of Section 5 of the Jammu &#038; Kashmir Limitation Samvat, 1995 and satisfy the court with sufficient cause for delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 1, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge bench comprising of M.K. Hanjura, J. while dealing with an application for condonation of delay in filing a review petition, dismissed both the application as well as the petition on grounds of inordinate delay in filing the same. Brief facts of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217026,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/18\/jk-hc-writ-under-art-226-admissible-only-if-there-is-allegation-of-violation-of-a-statutory-duty-on-the-part-of-statutory-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":206140,"position":5},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Writ under Art. 226 admissible only if there is allegation of violation of a statutory duty on the part of statutory authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. dismissed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against official respondents for restraining private persons from encroaching of the suit property of the petitioner. The petitioner herein had filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206140"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206140\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}