{"id":206080,"date":"2018-12-01T16:34:41","date_gmt":"2018-12-01T11:04:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206080"},"modified":"2018-12-04T14:15:29","modified_gmt":"2018-12-04T08:45:29","slug":"lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawful possession of a property cannot be interfered with by way of ouster or locking in absence of Court order"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna<\/strong> High Court:<\/strong> A Single judge bench comprising of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. while hearing a civil writ petition ruled that lawful possession of a property cannot be interfered with by way of ouster or locking of the premises in the absence of a Court order to that effect.<\/p>\n

Petitioners herein were the land owners and tenants of certain shops in Gaya and respondents were the buyers of these shops. The present petition was filed assailing the action of State authorities whereby petitioners\u2019 shops were locked and the main entrance thereto was forcibly blocked by unloading sand and stone chips in front of the said shops. Petitioners submitted various documents and circumstances to indicate their lawful ownership\/ tenancy of the land\/ shops in question.<\/p>\n

The primary question for consideration was as to whether the District administration or any private person can forcibly seal and put lock in the premises occupied by another person without following due process of law.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the report submitted by District administration showed that the petitioners were in lawful possession of the subject premises. Thus, without going into the question of title or otherwise, it was held that once the tenant petitioners were in possession of the shops in question, they could not have been dispossessed or their shops locked without the order of a civil court.<\/p>\n

The petition was disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate and Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya to ensure that the possession of shops in question be handed over to the petitioners after taking due receipt of the materials inside the shop.[Bigan Mistry v. State of Bihar,2018 SCC OnLine Pat 2148<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. while hearing a civil writ petition ruled that lawful possession <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32677,32676,30320,3590],"class_list":["post-206080","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-due-permission","tag-lawful-possession","tag-order","tag-property"],"yoast_head":"\nLawful possession of a property cannot be interfered with by way of ouster or locking in absence of Court order | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lawful possession of a property cannot be interfered with by way of ouster or locking in absence of Court order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. while hearing a civil writ petition ruled that lawful possession\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-01T11:04:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-04T08:45:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/\",\"name\":\"Lawful possession of a property cannot be interfered with by way of ouster or locking in absence of Court order | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-01T11:04:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-04T08:45:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lawful possession of a property cannot be interfered with by way of ouster or locking in absence of Court order\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lawful possession of a property cannot be interfered with by way of ouster or locking in absence of Court order | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lawful possession of a property cannot be interfered with by way of ouster or locking in absence of Court order","og_description":"Patna High Court: A Single judge bench comprising of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. while hearing a civil writ petition ruled that lawful possession","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-01T11:04:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-04T08:45:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/","name":"Lawful possession of a property cannot be interfered with by way of ouster or locking in absence of Court order | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-01T11:04:41+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-04T08:45:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/lawful-possession-of-a-property-cannot-be-interfered-with-by-way-of-ouster-or-locking-in-absence-of-court-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lawful possession of a property cannot be interfered with by way of ouster or locking in absence of Court order"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":342566,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/28\/bombay-hc-dismisses-speculative-plea-challenging-land-acquisition-after-77-years\/","url_meta":{"origin":206080,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Writ Petitions can’t be filed by raising mutually destructive pleas without any sense of responsibility\u2019; Bombay HC dismisses speculative plea against land acquisition after 77 years","author":"Editor","date":"February 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDelay, laches, and disputed questions of fact are all matters that cannot be ignored when it comes to exercising discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":371412,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/02\/madras-hc-daughter-entitled-to-half-share-in-ancestral-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":206080,"position":1},"title":"Sale deed not binding: Madras HC holds daughter entitled to half share in ancestral property under Hindu Succession Act","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 2, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely because Patta and Kist Receipts stand in the name of defendant, and because the plaintiff did not raise any objection for the same, the presumption of joint possession of a co-owner cannot be dislodged\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"daughter entitled to half share","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/daughter-entitled-to-half-share.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/daughter-entitled-to-half-share.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/daughter-entitled-to-half-share.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/daughter-entitled-to-half-share.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331160,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/19\/supreme-court-directs-indian-oil-corporation-handover-possession-disputed-property-landowner\/","url_meta":{"origin":206080,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court directs Indian Oil Corporation to handover possession of disputed property to landowner on or before 31-03-2025","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court permitted the petitioners to initiate contempt proceedings in addition to any other remedy which may be available to him, in case of failure to comply with the given directions.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Indian Oil Corporation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Indian-Oil-Corporation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Indian-Oil-Corporation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Indian-Oil-Corporation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Indian-Oil-Corporation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":166844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/02\/lawful-wedlock-established-man-cannot-accused-deceitful-cohabitation\/","url_meta":{"origin":206080,"position":3},"title":"Once a lawful wedlock is established, a man cannot be accused of deceitful cohabitation","author":"Saba","date":"November 2, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The petitioners preferred a miscellaneous petition under Section 482 of CrPC for quashing of FIR No. 98\/2013 registered at P.S. Kotwali, District Chittorgarh for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 376 IPC. Since the\u00a0 counsel for the petitioner was able to establish a lawful marriage between\u00a0 Petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":376282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/20\/bom-hc-systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":206080,"position":4},"title":"Acquisition without Compensation is Unconstitutional: Bombay HC criticises State over Systemic Failure in Land Acquisition Proceedings","author":"Sunaina","date":"February 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA large number of cases disclosed unjustified delay of nearly three decades in completing land acquisition proceedings even after taking possession of the petitioners\u2019 lands which resulted not only in grave prejudice to the landowners but also in substantial and avoidable financial burden on the public exchequer.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"systemic failure in land acquisition proceedings","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/systemic-failure-in-land-acquisition-proceedings.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352180,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/02\/ori-hc-grants-compensation-for-illegal-demolition-of-community-centre\/","url_meta":{"origin":206080,"position":5},"title":"Know why Orissa HC awarded Rs 10 lakh compensation for demolition of community centre in Cuttack","author":"Editor","date":"July 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe use of demolition as a tool of enforcement, absent procedural compliance and judicial finality, transforms what should be a lawful act into a coercive one.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"illegal demolition of community centre","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/illegal-demolition-of-community-centre.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/illegal-demolition-of-community-centre.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/illegal-demolition-of-community-centre.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/illegal-demolition-of-community-centre.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206080","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206080"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206080\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206080"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206080"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206080"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}