{"id":206051,"date":"2018-12-01T17:30:03","date_gmt":"2018-12-01T12:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206051"},"modified":"2018-12-04T13:40:03","modified_gmt":"2018-12-04T08:10:03","slug":"relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Relief sought against a Registered Society| A matter of civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by way of Article 226"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manoj K. Tiwari, J. dismissed a writ petition on account of it being a civil dispute.<\/p>\n

The petitioner was a Dimri (Brahmin) having a customary right of vriti (worship) at Sri Badrinath Ji temple who was denied the right to discharge religious obligation on the ground that he was not eligible to perform vriti at Laxmi Aatka and Garud by the order of respondent.<\/p>\n

Owing to the nature of relief sought, the Court was of the view that the respondent being a registered society the matter brought before it was a civil dispute adjudication of which was not permissible in view of the law laid down in Swati Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd. <\/em>v. Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corpn.<\/em>, (2015) 4 SCC 204<\/a> and Jacky <\/em>v. Tiny<\/em>, (2014) 6 SCC 508<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, in lieu of Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Court cannot exercise its powers and consequently, the writ petition was dismissed. [Govind Ballabh Dimri v. Sri Badrinath Kedarnath Temples Committee,2018 SCC OnLine Utt 956<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Uttaranchal High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manoj K. Tiwari, J. dismissed a writ petition on account of it being <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[12141,32672,32673],"class_list":["post-206051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-226","tag-civil-dispute","tag-registered-society"],"yoast_head":"\nRelief sought against a Registered Society| A matter of civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by way of Article 226 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Relief sought against a Registered Society| A matter of civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by way of Article 226\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manoj K. Tiwari, J. dismissed a writ petition on account of it being\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-01T12:00:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-04T08:10:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/\",\"name\":\"Relief sought against a Registered Society| A matter of civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by way of Article 226 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-01T12:00:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-04T08:10:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Relief sought against a Registered Society| A matter of civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by way of Article 226\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Relief sought against a Registered Society| A matter of civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by way of Article 226 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Relief sought against a Registered Society| A matter of civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by way of Article 226","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manoj K. Tiwari, J. dismissed a writ petition on account of it being","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-01T12:00:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-04T08:10:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/","name":"Relief sought against a Registered Society| A matter of civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by way of Article 226 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-01T12:00:03+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-04T08:10:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/relief-sought-against-a-registered-society-a-matter-of-civil-dispute-which-cannot-be-adjudicated-by-way-of-article-226-constitution-of-india\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Relief sought against a Registered Society| A matter of civil dispute cannot be adjudicated by way of Article 226"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":62761,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/23\/tribunal-whose-order-is-challenged-under-articles-226-and-227-is-not-a-necessary-party-in-a-special-civil-application\/","url_meta":{"origin":206051,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal whose order is challenged under Articles 226 and 227 is not a necessary party in a Special Civil Application","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 23, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Deciding the question that whether a tribunal or court whose order is challenged in proceedings under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is a necessary party to the proceedings, the Bench of A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud, JJ held that the tribunal is not a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242852,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/jk-hc-what-is-the-extent-of-interference-that-the-court-can-exercise-under-art-226-while-adjudicating-a-contractual-matter-hc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":206051,"position":1},"title":"J&K HC | What is the extent of interference that the Court can exercise under Art. 226 while adjudicating a contractual matter? HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"January 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Sanjay Dhar J., while dismissing the present petition, discussed the scope of interference under Article 226 in Contractual matters and further called the present case a classic example of filing successive petitions for the same relief after failing to get the interim relief in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":190594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/19\/matters-requiring-extensive-fact-finding-cannot-adjudicated-art-226\/","url_meta":{"origin":206051,"position":2},"title":"Matters requiring extensive fact finding cannot be adjudicated under Art. 226","author":"Saba","date":"February 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vineet Kothari, J., decided a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, wherein it declined to grant any relief as prayed for by the petitioner holding that it was not a fit case to be adjudicated under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204812,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/police-cannot-interfere-in-a-civil-case-unless-directed-by-a-competent-court-hyderabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":206051,"position":3},"title":"Police cannot interfere in a civil case unless directed by a competent Court: Hyderabad HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Hyderabad High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Gudiseva Shyam Prasad, J. dismissed a writ petition at the admission stage on account of it being misconceived. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the relief in the nature of writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238605,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/05\/casteism-is-obstruction-abuse-by-upper-caste-person-due-to-property-dispute-an-offence-under-sc-st-act-not-in-all-cases-says-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":206051,"position":4},"title":"Is obstruction & abuse by upper caste person due to property dispute an offence under SC\/ST Act? Not in all cases, says SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where abuses were hurled by a person of upper caste at a person belonging to Scheduled Caste due to a property dispute between them, the 3-judge bench of L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta* and Ajay Rastogi, JJ has held that no offence under Section 3(1)(r)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260576,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/can-a-non-member-invoke-provisions-of-andhra-pradesh-cooperative-societies-act-1964-supreme-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":206051,"position":5},"title":"Can a non-member invoke provisions of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964? Supreme Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana, CJ., A.S. Bopanna* and Hima Kohli, JJ., \u00a0held that non-members of cooperative societies have no right to seek remedy under Section 61 of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 (APCS Act). The land in question had been allotted to the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-54.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-54.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-54.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-54.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-54.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206051"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206051\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}