{"id":206034,"date":"2018-12-01T12:30:23","date_gmt":"2018-12-01T07:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=206034"},"modified":"2018-12-04T16:14:37","modified_gmt":"2018-12-04T10:44:37","slug":"cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/","title":{"rendered":"CGST Act, 2017 does not render proceedings initiated under Service Tax Act nugatory; quoting wrong provision of law doesn’t invalidate action of Authority"},"content":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>While dismissing a writ petition filed against the actions of Tax Authorities, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Debangsu Basak, J. reiterated\u00a0certain important principles of law.<\/p>\n

The petitioner had challenged the validity of actions of Tax Authorities in visiting petitioner’s premises and re-opening of assessment. Notably, the actions by the Authorities were taken under Service Tax Act, 1994. The petitioner contended that the said Act has no manner of application after the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 coming into force. Furthermore, relying on Delhi High Court decision in Mega Cabs (P) Ltd. v. Union of India<\/em>, 2016 SCC OnLine\u00a0Del\u00a03630<\/a>, it was submitted that Rule 5-A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, under which the Authority acted, was ultra vires.<\/p>\n

The High Court, after a meticulous appraisal of submissions, reiterated certain important principles of law which are, inter alia, as follows:<\/p>\n

(a)\u00a0Notwithstanding the availability of statutory alternative remedy, a writ petition is maintainable if the action complained of breaches any fundamental right of the petitioner or is without jurisdiction or is perverse.<\/p>\n

(b) Section 174 CGST Act provides that proceedings initiated under Service Tax Act, 1994 continue irrespective of coming into effect of the CGST Act.<\/p>\n

(c) Regarding Rule 5-A(2). the Court noted that the said rule was not pressed in present proceedings by the Authorities, however, in their affidavit, they mistakenly mentioned Rule 5-A (2) in place of Rules 5-A(1). It was reiterated that quoting a wrong provision of law does not invalidate the action taken if the authorities are otherwise empowered to take such action in law.<\/p>\n

In such view of the matter, the Court found no infirmity in the actions impugned and dismissed the petition. [EDMEE Digitronics (P) Ltd. v. Union of India,2018 SCC OnLine Cal 8191<\/b><\/a>, decided on 29-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court:\u00a0While dismissing a writ petition filed against the actions of Tax Authorities, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Debangsu Basak, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":52131,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[29698,32669],"class_list":["post-206034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cgst","tag-service-tax-act"],"yoast_head":"\nCGST Act, 2017 does not render proceedings initiated under Service Tax Act nugatory; quoting wrong provision of law doesn't invalidate action of Authority | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CGST Act, 2017 does not render proceedings initiated under Service Tax Act nugatory; quoting wrong provision of law doesn't invalidate action of Authority\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0While dismissing a writ petition filed against the actions of Tax Authorities, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Debangsu Basak,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-01T07:00:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-04T10:44:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/\",\"name\":\"CGST Act, 2017 does not render proceedings initiated under Service Tax Act nugatory; quoting wrong provision of law doesn't invalidate action of Authority | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-01T07:00:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-04T10:44:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CGST Act, 2017 does not render proceedings initiated under Service Tax Act nugatory; quoting wrong provision of law doesn’t invalidate action of Authority\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CGST Act, 2017 does not render proceedings initiated under Service Tax Act nugatory; quoting wrong provision of law doesn't invalidate action of Authority | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"CGST Act, 2017 does not render proceedings initiated under Service Tax Act nugatory; quoting wrong provision of law doesn't invalidate action of Authority","og_description":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0While dismissing a writ petition filed against the actions of Tax Authorities, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Debangsu Basak,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-12-01T07:00:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-04T10:44:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/","name":"CGST Act, 2017 does not render proceedings initiated under Service Tax Act nugatory; quoting wrong provision of law doesn't invalidate action of Authority | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","datePublished":"2018-12-01T07:00:23+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-04T10:44:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/01\/cgst-act-2017-does-not-render-proceedings-initiated-under-service-tax-act-nugatory-quoting-wrong-provision-of-law-doesnt-invalidate-action-of-authority\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CGST Act, 2017 does not render proceedings initiated under Service Tax Act nugatory; quoting wrong provision of law doesn’t invalidate action of Authority"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":142731,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/15\/impact-implications-of-gst-on-legal-practitioners-clarification-sought-from-government\/","url_meta":{"origin":206034,"position":0},"title":"Impact & implications of GST on Legal Practitioners: Clarification sought from Government","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"July 15, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Taking note of the fact that the legal practitioners are under a genuine doubt whether they require to get themselves registered under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (CGST Act), the Delhi Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (DGST Act) and the Integrated Goods and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":335349,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/16\/allahabad-hc-penalty-goods-in-transit-gst-registration-suspension\/","url_meta":{"origin":206034,"position":1},"title":"Penalty can’t be imposed on goods in transit with valid tax invoice and e-way bill, even after suspension of GST registration: Allahabad High Court","author":"Editor","date":"November 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court directed the authorities to carry out the exercise in terms of Section 129 (1)(a) of the CGST Act within a period of two weeks from the date of this order.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310389,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/30\/chhattisgarh-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-164-of-cgst-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206034,"position":2},"title":"Chhattisgarh High Court upholds constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017","author":"Editor","date":"December 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe petitioner herein, which has filed the present writ petition, is only a proprietorship firm and not a citizen and therefore cannot claim protection of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"chhattisgarh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chhattisgarh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305519,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/23\/dhc-directs-government-to-refund-rs-7-12cr-igst-to-vodafone-paid-for-its-international-services-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206034,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court directs government to refund Rs. 7.12 cr to Vodafone Idea Ltd. paid as IGST towards its international services","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe authorities rejected petitioner\u2019s refund claim by mentioning that payments in respect of some of the invoices are received in advance, but respondents have not referred to any particular instance where payments in respect of any invoices are received prior to the date of invoices.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321700,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/08\/ph-hc-stays-effect-of-circular-related-to-taxability-of-corporate-guarantees-scctimes\/","url_meta":{"origin":206034,"position":4},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court stays effect and operation of the circular related to taxability of corporate guarantees","author":"Arushi","date":"May 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Petitioner contended that such discrimination between petitioner and other assesses who were supplying any other goods\/service to related persons, being arbitrary and without any rational nexus, is violative of Article 14 and Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/27\/phc-imposes-cost-of-rs-5000-on-gst-assessing-officer-for-imposing-tax-coercively-in-absence-of-appellate-tribunal-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":206034,"position":5},"title":"\u2018No tax recovery can be made when GST Tribunal not constituted\u2019; Patna HC imposes cost of Rs 5000 on GST Assessing Officer for \u2018coercive\u2019 tax recovery","author":"Editor","date":"January 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf the Appellate Tribunal under Bihar Goods and Services Tax, 2017 is constituted and an appeal is filed there can be no further proceedings taken for recovery of the balance amounts till the appeal is disposed of.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"patna high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/patna-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/patna-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/patna-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/patna-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206034\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}