{"id":205975,"date":"2018-11-30T11:00:08","date_gmt":"2018-11-30T05:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205975"},"modified":"2018-11-30T16:58:56","modified_gmt":"2018-11-30T11:28:56","slug":"determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Determining question of intention in case pending investigation while deciding application under Section 482 CrPC not justified: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Bench comprising of Uday U. Lalit and Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of Bombay High Court whereby it had quashed criminal proceedings instituted against the respondent.<\/p>\n

According to the FIR for offence\u00a0under Section 306 IPC, the daughter and son-in-law of the appellant were teachers in a village Zila Parishad School where the respondent was also a teacher. He used to call appellant’s daughter on mobile and harass her. Despite efforts of his son-in-law, the respondent continued to call and harass the appellant’s daughter. There was a verbal altercation between his son-in-law and the respondent after which the son-in-law committed suicide leaving behind a suicide note naming the respondent. The respondent approached the High Court under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the FIR. Observing that prima facie the respondent did not have the intention to aid or instigate the deceased to commit suicide, the High Court quashed the FIR. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant preferred the present appeal by special leave.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court noted that there\u00a0were definite allegations against the respondent which were supported by statement of witnesses as well as the suicide note written by the deceased. The Court was of the opinion that the High Court was not justified\u00a0in entering into question whether the respondent\u00a0had requisite intent to aid, instigate or abate the commission of suicide at the stage where the investigation was yet to be completed. The Court found merit in submissions of the appellant and set aside the judgment impugned. The appeal was allowed and the authorities concerned were directed to complete the investigation.[Narayan Malhari Thorat v. Vinayak Deorao Bhagat,2018 SCC OnLine SC 2571<\/b><\/a>, decided on 28-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of Uday U. Lalit and Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of Bombay <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[3067,30947,13021,32647,32646],"class_list":["post-205975","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-FIR","tag-section-306-ipc","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-statement-of-witness","tag-suicide-note"],"yoast_head":"\nDetermining question of intention in case pending investigation while deciding application under Section 482 CrPC not justified: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Determining question of intention in case pending investigation while deciding application under Section 482 CrPC not justified: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of Uday U. Lalit and Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of Bombay\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-30T05:30:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-30T11:28:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Determining question of intention in case pending investigation while deciding application under Section 482 CrPC not justified: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-30T05:30:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-30T11:28:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Determining question of intention in case pending investigation while deciding application under Section 482 CrPC not justified: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Determining question of intention in case pending investigation while deciding application under Section 482 CrPC not justified: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Determining question of intention in case pending investigation while deciding application under Section 482 CrPC not justified: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of Uday U. Lalit and Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of Bombay","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-30T05:30:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-30T11:28:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/","name":"Determining question of intention in case pending investigation while deciding application under Section 482 CrPC not justified: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-11-30T05:30:08+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-30T11:28:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/determining-question-of-intention-in-case-pending-investigation-while-deciding-application-under-section-482-crpc-not-justified-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Determining question of intention in case pending investigation while deciding application under Section 482 CrPC not justified: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":258932,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/23\/husband-his-family-harass-wife-for-dowry-leading-to-her-committing-suicide\/","url_meta":{"origin":205975,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Husband, his family harass wife for dowry leading to her committing suicide. Can settlement between accused and wife’s father be accepted? Court decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Mukta Gupta, J., decided whether a settlement of parties wherein an accused and his family members who subjected his wife to harassment due to which the wife committed suicide can be accepted or not? By the present petition, 5 petitioners sought quashing of an FIR under Sections\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":265411,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/14\/forum-shopping-civil-complaint-criminal-case-section-482-supreme-court-legal-research-updates-news-high-courts\/","url_meta":{"origin":205975,"position":1},"title":"Forum Shopping and Power of High Court u\/s 482 CrPC; Supreme Court tells when to convert a civil complaint into criminal case","author":"Editor","date":"April 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cForum shopping has been termed as disreputable practice by the courts and has no sanction and paramountcy in law.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Forum-Shopping-and-Power-of-High-Court-us-482-CrPC-Supreme-Court-tells-when-to-convert-a-civil-complaint-into-criminal-case.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Forum-Shopping-and-Power-of-High-Court-us-482-CrPC-Supreme-Court-tells-when-to-convert-a-civil-complaint-into-criminal-case.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Forum-Shopping-and-Power-of-High-Court-us-482-CrPC-Supreme-Court-tells-when-to-convert-a-civil-complaint-into-criminal-case.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Forum-Shopping-and-Power-of-High-Court-us-482-CrPC-Supreme-Court-tells-when-to-convert-a-civil-complaint-into-criminal-case.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Forum-Shopping-and-Power-of-High-Court-us-482-CrPC-Supreme-Court-tells-when-to-convert-a-civil-complaint-into-criminal-case.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201243,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/03\/fir-lodged-on-mere-basis-of-taking-revenge-against-wifes-maintenance-petition-liable-to-be-quashed-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":205975,"position":2},"title":"FIR lodged on mere basis of taking revenge against wife\u2019s maintenance petition, liable to be quashed: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cClassic case of taking revenge by the husband against the wife on being aggrieved by the maintenance petition filed.\u201d Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana and M.M. Shantanagoudar, JJ., allowed a petition while setting aside the order passed by Allahabad High Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":154334,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/06\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-as-fir-disclosed-commission-of-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":205975,"position":3},"title":"High Court refuses to invoke inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC as FIR disclosed commission of offence","author":"Saba","date":"September 6, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The petitioner preferred a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR No. 322\/2016 for the offences under Sections 115 and 108 IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that taking advantage of an official position and being a politically powerful person, Respondent 2\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":235115,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/31\/guj-hc-will-the-act-of-demanding-repayment-of-money-bring-a-case-within-the-meaning-of-s-306-ipc-hc-throws-light-on-ingredients-of-abetment-to-suicide\/","url_meta":{"origin":205975,"position":4},"title":"Guj HC | Will the Act of demanding repayment of money bring a case within the meaning of S. 306 IPC? HC throws light on ingredients of abetment to suicide","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court:\u00a0Gita Gopi, J., while addressing an issue with regard to abetment to suicide held that in accordance with the ingredients of Section 306 of the Penal Code, 1860 the act of demanding the repayment of money would not bring a case within the meaning of Section 306 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283524,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/09\/petition-filed-under-section-1563-crpc-must-satisfy-the-essential-ingredients-to-attract-alleged-offences-supreme-court-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":205975,"position":5},"title":"Petition filed under Section 156(3) CrPC must satisfy the essential ingredients to attract alleged offences: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"February 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court observed that if allegations in the petition are vague and are not specific with respect to the alleged offences, it cannot lead to an order for registration of an FIR and investigation on the accusation of commission of the offences alleged.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-343.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205975","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205975"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205975\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205975"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205975"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205975"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}