{"id":205937,"date":"2018-11-29T16:00:50","date_gmt":"2018-11-29T10:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205937"},"modified":"2018-12-07T18:46:54","modified_gmt":"2018-12-07T13:16:54","slug":"rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/","title":{"rendered":"Rehearing of issues not allowed in cases of review but Commission may interfere where there is an apparent error in the order \u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)<\/strong>: A Single Member Bench of Prem Narain (Presiding Member), partly allowed a review petition filed against the order of the Commission, whereby names of various complainants were included in the order although some of them had withdrawn their complaints while others were not even impleaded in the first place.<\/p>\n

The main issue that arose before the Commission was whether any sort of interference was called for in the review petition filed by the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Commission observed that Section 22(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (COPRA) is limited to the error apparent on the face of the record. The Commission then referred to the Supreme Court judgments of Union of India v. Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd.<\/em>, (2013) 8 SCC 337<\/a> and S.Bagirathi Ammal v. Palani Roman Catholic Mission<\/em>, (2009) 10 SCC 464<\/a>, wherein it was held that the power of review cannot be exercised solely on basis that the parties do not agree with the view of the judgment, as long as the point is already dealt with and answered, parties are not entitled to challenge the impugned judgment in the guise that an alternative view is possible under review jurisdiction. Under the review jurisdiction, rehearing of issues is not allowed but the same issues can be decided just by a perusal of the records and if a prima facie<\/em> error is detected then it can be corrected using the review jurisdiction. In the instant case, the error was apparent only with respect to certain complainants.<\/p>\n

The Commission held that the names of those complainants, who had withdrawn their complaints and also those who were not impleaded in the complaint, can be deleted from the order; however, the similarly situated complainants can still derive the benefit of the impugned order since it was a class complaint. On the issue of compensation, the Commission held that some of the complainants had taken possession prior to the date till when the compensation was awarded to them, hence in such cases the compensation shall be given to them only up to the date when they were handed over the possession. Resultantly, the impugned order was modified and the review petition was partly allowed.[R.V. Prasannakumaar v. Mantri Castles (P) Ltd., Review Application No. 198 of 2018, order dated 27-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Single Member Bench of Prem Narain (Presiding Member), partly allowed a review petition filed against <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":199533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[31754,32639,2897],"class_list":["post-205937","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-error","tag-rehearing","tag-Review"],"yoast_head":"\nRehearing of issues not allowed in cases of review but Commission may interfere where there is an apparent error in the order \u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rehearing of issues not allowed in cases of review but Commission may interfere where there is an apparent error in the order \u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Single Member Bench of Prem Narain (Presiding Member), partly allowed a review petition filed against\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-29T10:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-07T13:16:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/\",\"name\":\"Rehearing of issues not allowed in cases of review but Commission may interfere where there is an apparent error in the order \u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-29T10:30:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-07T13:16:54+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887,\"caption\":\"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rehearing of issues not allowed in cases of review but Commission may interfere where there is an apparent error in the order \u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rehearing of issues not allowed in cases of review but Commission may interfere where there is an apparent error in the order \u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rehearing of issues not allowed in cases of review but Commission may interfere where there is an apparent error in the order \u00a0","og_description":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): A Single Member Bench of Prem Narain (Presiding Member), partly allowed a review petition filed against","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-29T10:30:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-07T13:16:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/","name":"Rehearing of issues not allowed in cases of review but Commission may interfere where there is an apparent error in the order \u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","datePublished":"2018-11-29T10:30:50+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-07T13:16:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","width":1330,"height":887,"caption":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/rehearing-of-issues-not-allowed-in-cases-of-review-but-the-commission-may-interfere-in-cases-where-there-is-an-apparent-error-in-the-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rehearing of issues not allowed in cases of review but Commission may interfere where there is an apparent error in the order \u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":223682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/30\/cerc-plea-of-rehearing-rejected-where-an-error-could-not-be-established-on-the-face-of-the-record\/","url_meta":{"origin":205937,"position":0},"title":"CERC | Plea of rehearing rejected where an error could not be established on the face of the record","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC): The Coram of P.K. Pujari (Chairperson), Dr M.K. Iyer (Member) and I.S. Jha (Member) dismissed a petition filed for the review of an order dated 09-08-2019. The Review Petitioners stated that the Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (PGCIL) had filed a petition seeking regulatory\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Central-Electricity-Regulatory-Commission-%E2%80%93-CERC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Central-Electricity-Regulatory-Commission-%E2%80%93-CERC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Central-Electricity-Regulatory-Commission-%E2%80%93-CERC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Central-Electricity-Regulatory-Commission-%E2%80%93-CERC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Central-Electricity-Regulatory-Commission-%E2%80%93-CERC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238161,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/29\/mp-hc-in-the-garb-of-review-rehearing-cannot-be-permitted-court-dismisses-review-petition-finding-no-error-apparent\/","url_meta":{"origin":205937,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | In the garb of review, rehearing cannot be permitted; Court dismisses review petition finding no error apparent","author":"Editor","date":"October 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: In a case seeking review of an order of this particular Court by the petitioner, Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J., dismissed the same finding no ground to interfere in the original order. The instant review petition has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Civil\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":198318,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/09\/review-petition-of-the-nirbhaya-gangrape-convicts-dismissed-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":205937,"position":2},"title":"Review petition of the \u2018Nirbhaya\u2019 Gangrape convicts dismissed: Supreme Court [Judgment]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 9, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere has to be an error apparent on the face of\u00a0record\u00a0leading to miscarriage of justice to exercise the review jurisdiction under Article 137.\u201d Supreme Court:\u00a0While envisaging the essence of Article 137 of the Constitution of India by stating that\u00a0\u201cArticle 137 empowers the Supreme Court to review any judgment pronounced or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":323119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/28\/ncdrc-stays-order-against-honda-by-maharashtra-consumer-commission-to-replace-defective-vehicle-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":205937,"position":3},"title":"NCDRC stays Maharashtra Consumer Commission\u2019s order directing Honda Motors to replace defective vehicle","author":"Editor","date":"May 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Maharashtra Commission in the impugned order, had concluded that the vehicle had a manufacturing defect, without calling for an expert report on the matter.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/National-Consumer-Disputes-Redressal-Commission.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/15\/mp-hc-no-reason-to-review-by-court-if-there-is-no-error-apparent-on-the-face-of-record-review-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":205937,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | No reason to review by court if there is no error apparent on the face of record; review petition dismissed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of S.C. Sharma and Virender Singh, JJ., dismissed the review petition on the ground that no interference was required when there was no error apparent on the face of the record. A Public Interest Litigation Writ Petition was made by certain persons against\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":365246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/30\/doctrine-of-merger-not-attracted-by-dismissed-slp-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":205937,"position":5},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by Supreme Court with or without reasons, will not attract the Doctrine of Merger: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile exercising the review jurisdiction, it must be borne in mind that review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and must strictly be confined to the scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Doctrine of Merger","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205937","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205937"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205937\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/199533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205937"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205937"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205937"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}