{"id":205921,"date":"2018-11-29T12:00:15","date_gmt":"2018-11-29T06:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205921"},"modified":"2018-12-01T15:30:19","modified_gmt":"2018-12-01T10:00:19","slug":"office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/","title":{"rendered":"Order punishing government employee quashed in light of disciplinary authority\u2019s violation of principle of audi alteram partem"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna<\/strong> High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J. quashed an office order issued against a delinquent employee ruling that the disciplinary authority had not assigned reasons for the said order and had also not given an opportunity of hearing to the employee.<\/p>\n

The instant petition was filed having been aggrieved by an office order inflicting upon him major punishment of stoppage of two annual increments with cumulative effect, censure, non-payment of salary for the period of suspension and punishment that he shall not hold the post of Headmaster-cum-Drawing & Disbursing Officer in future.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the petitioner had been proceeded against on the basis of charges submitted by the District Superintendent of Education, Munger. After enquiry report, second show cause notice was issued to him in the form of impugned office order. The said second show cause notice which recorded a finding different from that of the enquiry officer did not accord reasons for order and no opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court placed reliance on dictum of \u00a0Apex Court in Punjab National Bank v. Kunj Behari Misra, <\/em>(1998) 7 SCC 84<\/a> and observed that while the finding of enquiry officer is not binding on the disciplinary authority, but while differing with the finding disciplinary authority is required to assign reasons and provide opportunity of hearing so that the delinquent may have an opportunity to persuade it in respect of favourable finding of the enquiry officer. Further, Rule 18 of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005 made it obligatory for the disciplinary authority to follow the principles laid down in the Kunj Behari<\/em> case.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the petition was allowed and impugned office order was quashed for being issued without following principles of natural justice and for being a non-speaking order.[Yogendra Paswan v. State of Bihar,2018 SCC OnLine Pat 2108<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J. quashed an office order issued against a delinquent employee <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[21444,24274,32629,29540],"class_list":["post-205921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-audi-alteram-partem","tag-disciplinary-authority","tag-increments","tag-non-speaking-order"],"yoast_head":"\nOrder punishing government employee quashed in light of disciplinary authority\u2019s violation of principle of audi alteram partem | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Order punishing government employee quashed in light of disciplinary authority\u2019s violation of principle of audi alteram partem\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J. quashed an office order issued against a delinquent employee\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-29T06:30:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-01T10:00:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/\",\"name\":\"Order punishing government employee quashed in light of disciplinary authority\u2019s violation of principle of audi alteram partem | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-29T06:30:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-01T10:00:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Order punishing government employee quashed in light of disciplinary authority\u2019s violation of principle of audi alteram partem\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Order punishing government employee quashed in light of disciplinary authority\u2019s violation of principle of audi alteram partem | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Order punishing government employee quashed in light of disciplinary authority\u2019s violation of principle of audi alteram partem","og_description":"Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J. quashed an office order issued against a delinquent employee","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-29T06:30:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-01T10:00:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/","name":"Order punishing government employee quashed in light of disciplinary authority\u2019s violation of principle of audi alteram partem | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-11-29T06:30:15+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-01T10:00:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/29\/office-order-punishing-government-employee-quashed-for-being-a-non-speaking-order-and-for-disciplinary-authoritys-violation-of-principle-of-audi-alteram-partem\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Order punishing government employee quashed in light of disciplinary authority\u2019s violation of principle of audi alteram partem"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":150364,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/18\/delhi-high-court-emphasizes-on-the-importance-of-audi-alteram-partem\/","url_meta":{"origin":205921,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court emphasizes on the importance of Audi Alterem Partem","author":"Saba","date":"August 18, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court emphasized on the importance of Natural Justice. The Court expunged the remarks which were made in a judgment by the trial court in which the petitioner was a supervising officer for a period but not for the entirety\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":237677,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/17\/can-the-breach-of-audi-alteram-partem-rule-by-itself-lead-to-the-conclusion-that-prejudice-has-been-caused-sc-elucidates\/","url_meta":{"origin":205921,"position":1},"title":"Can the breach of audi alteram partem rule by itself lead to the conclusion that prejudice has been caused? SC elucidates","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of RF Nariman, Navin Sinha and KM Joseph has reiterated the principles of natural justice as follows: (1) Natural justice is a flexible tool in the hands of the judiciary to reach out in fit cases to remedy injustice. The breach of the audi alteram\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239631,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/25\/all-hc-%e2%94%82-fundamental-principle-of-natural-justice-audi-alteram-partem-cannot-be-violated-court-issues-directions\/","url_meta":{"origin":205921,"position":2},"title":"All HC | Fundamental principle of natural justice audi alteram partem cannot be violated; Court issues directions \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"November 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Judge Bench of Surya Prakash Kesarwani and Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ., disposed off a writ petition issuing directions emphasizing upon the rule of audi alteram partem. The writ petition was filed seeking to challenge a communication where the petitioner has been directed to deposit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":248674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/25\/audi-alteram-partem-utt-hc-order-passed-without-giving-an-opportunity-to-be-heard-gross-violation-of-natural-justice-court-quashes-order-passed-by-registrar\/","url_meta":{"origin":205921,"position":3},"title":"[Audi alteram partem] Utt HC | Order passed without giving an opportunity to be heard gross violation of natural justice; Court quashes order passed by Registrar","author":"Editor","date":"May 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J., allowed petitions which were filed having the common question of law and facts thus were taken together with the consent of parties. The petitioner was elected as Director\/Member of Committee of Management of a Cooperative Society, namely, Buhuddesiya Narsan Gurukul Kisan Sewa Sahkari\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264121,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/23\/irregular-disciplinary-enquiry-court-cannot-reinstate-employee-as-such-matter-must-be-remanded-to-enquiry-officer-disciplinary-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":205921,"position":4},"title":"Irregular Disciplinary Enquiry: Court cannot reinstate employee as such; Matter must be remanded to Enquiry Officer\/Disciplinary Authority\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a disciplinary proceeding where it was established that there was a breach of principles of natural justice as the relevant documents mentioned in the charge sheet were not supplied to the delinquent officer, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has reiterated the settled legal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-112.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-112.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-112.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-112.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-112.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243328,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/04\/utt-hc-audi-alteram-partem-is-the-soul-of-principle-of-natural-justice-court-issues-directions\/","url_meta":{"origin":205921,"position":5},"title":"Utt HC | Audi alteram partem is the soul of principle of natural justice; Court issues directions","author":"Editor","date":"February 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Narayan Singh Dhanik and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ., disposed of a writ petition while giving certain directions in the matter filed by an officer in the Higher Judicial Service of the State of Uttarakhand seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the orders\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205921"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205921\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}