{"id":205638,"date":"2018-11-24T14:00:10","date_gmt":"2018-11-24T08:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205638"},"modified":"2018-11-28T12:52:47","modified_gmt":"2018-11-28T07:22:47","slug":"section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court:<\/b> A Division bench comprising of Dr Ravi Ranjan and Madhuresh Prasad, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition quashed the order of Gram Kutchery holding the same to be outside the scope of its jurisdiction.<\/p>\n

Facts of the case were that the respondent filed an application before the Gram Kutchery, Mahui alleging that the petitioner had encroached upon Ram Janki temple land without having any right over it. The Gram Kutchery passed an order directing petitioner to vacate the said land. The order was carried in appeal before the first appellate authority \u2013 Full members of Gram Kutchery \u2013which rejected the petitioner\u2019s appeal. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred the instant appeal.<\/p>\n

Submission on behalf of the petitioner was that Gram Kutchery\u2019s order had the effect of deciding\u00a0<\/span>right to possess the lands in question and such an adjudication touching upon the title of lands was beyond its competence. Whereas the respondent submitted that the petitioner had\u00a0 <\/span>wrongfully encroached upon the said land and therefore Gram Kutchery was well within its jurisdiction to pass the impugned order.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Court observed that the question as to whether the petitioner had any right to possess the subject land or whether his possession was illegal could only be decided by examining his right, title and interest vis-a-vis of the private respondent. Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 did not contemplate such a jurisdiction on the Gram Kutchery. The power to remove encroachments did not vest in it. Even otherwise, scope of Section 110 of the Act did not include determination of complicated issues of law and title.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In view of the above, the Court held that the Gram Kutchery\u2019s exercise of jurisdiction under Section 110 of the Act was grossly illegal and without jurisdiction. The writ petition was allowed and impugned order was quashed.[Bhola Sah v. State of Bihar,2018 SCC OnLine Pat 2030<\/b><\/a>, decided on 06-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: A Division bench comprising of Dr Ravi Ranjan and Madhuresh Prasad, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition quashed <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32574,2554,32573],"class_list":["post-205638","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-gram-kutchery","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-section-110-panchayat-raj-act"],"yoast_head":"\nSection 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: A Division bench comprising of Dr Ravi Ranjan and Madhuresh Prasad, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition quashed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-24T08:30:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-28T07:22:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-24T08:30:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-28T07:22:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC","og_description":"Patna High Court: A Division bench comprising of Dr Ravi Ranjan and Madhuresh Prasad, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition quashed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-24T08:30:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-28T07:22:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/","name":"Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-11-24T08:30:10+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-28T07:22:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/24\/section-110-of-the-panchayat-raj-act-2006-does-not-vest-gram-kutchery-with-jurisdiction-to-decide-complicated-issues-of-law-and-title-patna-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Section 110 of the Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 does not vest Gram Kutchery with jurisdiction to decide complicated issues of law and title: Patna HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":208390,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/mp-hc-order-in-excess-of-powers-under-section-391a-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-avam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam-is-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":205638,"position":0},"title":"MP HC | Order in excess of powers under Section 39(1)(a) of M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam is illegal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This case was filed before a Bench of Rohit Arya, J., where petitioner who was a sarpanch was suspended. Petitioner contended that he was suspended by the impugned order on the ground that a case had been registered for the commission of offence under Sections 7,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200806,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/29\/constitution-of-proposed-gram-panchayat-quashed-on-failure-of-presence-of-quoram-as-required-under-punjab-panchayat-raj-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":205638,"position":1},"title":"Constitution of proposed Gram Panchayat quashed on failure of presence of quorum as required under Punjab Panchayat Raj Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shekhar Dhawan, J., addressed a writ petition in nature of certiorari for quashing of a notification for creation of new Panchayats. Facts of the case are that the Punjab Government issued a letter seeking application for forming of new\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/","url_meta":{"origin":205638,"position":2},"title":"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: The Bench comprising of S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, J. hearing a petition challenging motion of no-confidence moved against President of Hallare Gram Panchayat, held the same to be invalid for not being in accordance with law. Petitioner, the President of Hallare Gram Panchayat, was issued a notice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/19\/state-government-has-power-under-section-91-of-the-panchayat-raj-and-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam-1993-to-interfere-with-an-order-passed-by-an-authority-under-the-adhiniyam\/","url_meta":{"origin":205638,"position":3},"title":"State Government has power under Section 91 of the Panchayat Raj and Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 to interfere with an order passed by an authority under the Adhiniyam","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A review petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Sujoy Paul, J., to review an order passed by this court. Respondent had availed all the remedies available to him under M.P. Panchayat Service (D&A) Rules, 1999 where these rules were created under Section 70\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":241891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/07\/hp-hc-interpretation-of-statutes-court-while-drawing-distinction-between-the-terms-block-and-constituency-denies-to-reserve-the-post-of-pradhan-in-gram-panchay\/","url_meta":{"origin":205638,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | [Interpretation of Statutes] Court while drawing distinction between the terms \u2018Block\u2019 and \u2018Constituency\u2019, denies to reserve the post of Pradhan in Gram Panchayat elections for ST category","author":"Editor","date":"January 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. and Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. while dismissing the present petition on lack of merits observed,\u201cFor elections in Gram Panchayat, it is the \u2018Block\u2019, which will be the relevant factor for determining the eligibility of the Gram Panchayat for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":221493,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/","url_meta":{"origin":205638,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G. S. Ahluwalia, J., allowed a petition and directed the respondents to not take any coercive step against the petitioner unless and until an enquiry is conducted under Section 89 of\u00a0M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj, Adhiniyam, 1993. \u00a0The petitioner has filed the instant petition under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205638","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205638"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205638\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}