{"id":205590,"date":"2018-11-21T15:30:29","date_gmt":"2018-11-21T10:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205590"},"modified":"2018-11-28T12:46:15","modified_gmt":"2018-11-28T07:16:15","slug":"to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/","title":{"rendered":"To interfere or not to interfere: A decision to be made after considering the merits of the case, in terms of Rule 52 of the J&#038;K Agrarian Reforms Rules, 1977"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of Special Tribunal, whereby the Tribunal directed the appellate authority to adjudicate the appeal afresh keeping in mind Rule 52 of the Jammu &amp; Kashmir Agrarian Reforms Rules, 1977 (the Rules).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The main issue that arose before the Court was whether Rule 52 of the Rules would be applicable in the instant matter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that the petitioner had participated in the appeal proceedings for more than 2 years. This action on the part of the petitioner suggests that it had elected to accept the order of the Tribunal. The Court referred to the Supreme Court judgment of <em>Joint Action Committee of Airline Pilots Association of India (ALPAI) v. Director General of Civil Aviation<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/969o4su8\">(2011) 5 SCC 435<\/a>, wherein it was held that in case if a party does not speak or protests in a matter where he should, then such a party is estopped from challenging the outcome of such a dispute, this doctrine is known as doctrine of election. The Court further observed that while deciding the issue of limitation in terms of Rule 52, the appellate authority must also consider the contents of the main appeal and only after that it should form an opinion if the case requires interference or not. The rule does not leave it to the discretion of the Appellate Authority to choose in which cases it may decide to go into the merits to decide whether it is a case for the exercise of revisional powers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that in the instant case the appellate authority had only touched the issue of limitation without giving any consideration to the main merits of the case and without proceeding to the contents of the appeal, it was impossible to form an opinion in terms of Rule 52 of the Rules. Resultantly, the petition was dismissed and the order of the Tribunal was upheld.[Rano Devi v. State of J&amp;K,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9Q2Bq8k6\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 836<\/b><\/a>, order dated 16-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31752,32559,32560,32558],"class_list":["post-205590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appellate-authority","tag-interfere","tag-jammu-kashmir-agrarian-reforms-rules","tag-merits"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>To interfere or not to interfere: A decision to be made after considering the merits of the case, in terms of Rule 52 of the J&amp;K Agrarian Reforms Rules, 1977 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"To interfere or not to interfere: A decision to be made after considering the merits of the case, in terms of Rule 52 of the J&amp;K Agrarian Reforms Rules, 1977\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-21T10:00:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-28T07:16:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/\",\"name\":\"To interfere or not to interfere: A decision to be made after considering the merits of the case, in terms of Rule 52 of the J&K Agrarian Reforms Rules, 1977 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-21T10:00:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-28T07:16:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"To interfere or not to interfere: A decision to be made after considering the merits of the case, in terms of Rule 52 of the J&#038;K Agrarian Reforms Rules, 1977\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"To interfere or not to interfere: A decision to be made after considering the merits of the case, in terms of Rule 52 of the J&K Agrarian Reforms Rules, 1977 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"To interfere or not to interfere: A decision to be made after considering the merits of the case, in terms of Rule 52 of the J&K Agrarian Reforms Rules, 1977","og_description":"Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-21T10:00:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-28T07:16:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/","name":"To interfere or not to interfere: A decision to be made after considering the merits of the case, in terms of Rule 52 of the J&K Agrarian Reforms Rules, 1977 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-11-21T10:00:29+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-28T07:16:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/21\/to-interfere-or-not-to-interfere-a-decision-to-be-made-after-considering-the-merits-of-the-case-in-terms-of-rule-52-of-the-jk-agrarian-reforms-rules-1977\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"To interfere or not to interfere: A decision to be made after considering the merits of the case, in terms of Rule 52 of the J&#038;K Agrarian Reforms Rules, 1977"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216785,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/12\/jk-hc-process-which-is-not-mentioned-in-service-rules-or-statute-governing-the-appointment-process-cannot-be-given-effect-by-the-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":205590,"position":0},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Process which is not mentioned in service rules or statute governing appointment process, cannot be given effect by the Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Ali Mohammad Magrey, J. dismissed an appeal seeking directions for an appointment based on the subsequent waiting list when the selected candidate and the waitlisted candidate did not report. The petitioner had offered his candidature for selection against the post of Accounts Assistant (ST category)\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214712,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/16\/jk-hc-suspension-does-not-tantamount-to-punishment-compliance-with-principles-of-natural-justice-held-not-necessary\/","url_meta":{"origin":205590,"position":1},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Suspension does not tantamount to punishment, compliance with principles of natural justice held not necessary","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J. dismissed a petition challenging an order suspending petitioner and ordering an enquiry into his conduct, holding that principles of natural justice are not applicable to matters of suspension from service. The petitioner challenged his suspension order on the grounds that he was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":326353,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/11\/delhi-high-court-upholds-blocking-briar-app-jammu-kashmir-terrorist-activities-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":205590,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court upholds Blocking of UK based \u2018Briar App\u2019 in Jammu and Kashmir due to Terrorist Activities","author":"Arunima","date":"July 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Sublime Software Limited developed an app called \u201cBriar\u201d, which is a Free and Open-Source Software (FOSS) which operates on a technology in which a person can directly send a message to another person even when there is no internet connectivity.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":81381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/24\/jk-high-court-asked-to-constitute-a-committee-to-look-into-the-availability-of-infrastructure-and-facilities-in-government-hospitals-of-the-state\/","url_meta":{"origin":205590,"position":3},"title":"J&#038;K High Court asked to constitute a committee to look into the availability of infrastructure and facilities in Government Hospitals of the State","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 24, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Reverting back the matter relating to the validity of a circular issued by the Government of J&K which adverted to the provisions of Rule 10 of the Jammu and Kashmir Government Employees (Conduct) Rules, 1971 which prohibits a government servant from taking up any assignment without the permission\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332994,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/14\/president-rule-revoked-in-jammu-and-kashmir-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":205590,"position":4},"title":"President\u2019s rule revoked in Jammu &amp; Kashmir","author":"Kriti","date":"October 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"MHA issues notification revoking the President\u2019s rule in Jammu and Kashmir.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"President's rule in J and K","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Presidents-rule-in-J-and-K.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Presidents-rule-in-J-and-K.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Presidents-rule-in-J-and-K.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/Presidents-rule-in-J-and-K.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/03\/benefit-of-compassionate-appointment-in-jk-can-be-availed-by-adopted-children-only-if-their-community-acknowledges-adoption\/","url_meta":{"origin":205590,"position":5},"title":"Benefit of compassionate appointment can be given to an adopted person provided the personal law allows the adoption","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ali Mohammad Magrey, J., dismissed a petition filed by the petitioner seeking the benefit of SRO 43 of 1994 [Jammu & Kashmir (Compassionate Appointment) Rules, 1994]. The petitioner was an adopted son whose father was killed in an encounter\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205590\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}