{"id":205549,"date":"2018-11-20T16:05:17","date_gmt":"2018-11-20T10:35:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205549"},"modified":"2018-11-28T13:41:47","modified_gmt":"2018-11-28T08:11:47","slug":"combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Combined impact of different weapons used during robbery to be considered for conviction under Section 397 IPC: Del HC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mukta Gupta,\u00a0 J. dismissed a bunch of criminal appeals filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellants were convicted under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC.<\/p>\n

The appellants were accused of having robbed passengers of a gramin sewa\u00a0<\/em>vehicle by pointing deadly weapons like knife, pistol and\u00a0katta.\u00a0<\/em>The trial court, after appraisal of the facts and evidence and on perusal\u00a0of witness testimonies, held that the allegations against the appellants stood proved to bring home their guilt. Accordingly, the appellants were convicted by the trial court as mentioned above. Aggrieved thereby, the appellants filed the instant appeals. They sought benefit of doubt\u00a0as the main witness did not corroborate the prosecution case as to the carrying of particular weapons by the appellants as mentioned by the prosecution.<\/p>\n

The High Court, after perusing the record was of the opinion that there was no error in the judgment passed by the trial court. The testimony, as well as the prosecution version, was appraised and it was found that there was necessary corroboration to bring home the guilt of the appellants.<\/p>\n

One important issue arose in the appeal filed by one of the appellants — Wahid. It was contended that he was carrying a screwdriver while committing robbery which could not be said to be a\u00a0deadly\u00a0<\/em>weapon and therefore could not have been convicted under Section 397 IPC. It was noted that in\u00a0Phool Kumar v. Delhi Admn.,\u00a0<\/a><\/em>(1975) 1 SCC 797,<\/a>\u00a0it was held that\u00a0a person who uses the deadly weapon can only be convicted under Section 397 IPC. In the instant case, noted the Court, four appellants used four different weapons and committed the robbery together. In such a case, it was held,\u00a0 the overall impact of the weapons is also to be seen. Thus, in light of the other appellants carrying weapons like knife and pistol, the effect on the mind of the victim would have been that of a deadly weapon. In such a view of the matter, the contention as aforesaid was turned down. Resultantly, the appeals were dismissed. [Arif v. State (NCT of Delhi),2018 SCC OnLine Del 12380<\/b><\/a>, decided on 15-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mukta Gupta,\u00a0 J. dismissed a bunch of criminal appeals filed against the judgment of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32537,30636,30559,32538],"class_list":["post-205549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-combined-effect","tag-robbery","tag-section-397-ipc","tag-weapons"],"yoast_head":"\nCombined impact of different weapons used during robbery to be considered for conviction under Section 397 IPC: Del HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Combined impact of different weapons used during robbery to be considered for conviction under Section 397 IPC: Del HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mukta Gupta,\u00a0 J. dismissed a bunch of criminal appeals filed against the judgment of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-20T10:35:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-28T08:11:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Combined impact of different weapons used during robbery to be considered for conviction under Section 397 IPC: Del HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-20T10:35:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-28T08:11:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Combined impact of different weapons used during robbery to be considered for conviction under Section 397 IPC: Del HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Combined impact of different weapons used during robbery to be considered for conviction under Section 397 IPC: Del HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Combined impact of different weapons used during robbery to be considered for conviction under Section 397 IPC: Del HC","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mukta Gupta,\u00a0 J. dismissed a bunch of criminal appeals filed against the judgment of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-20T10:35:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-28T08:11:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/","name":"Combined impact of different weapons used during robbery to be considered for conviction under Section 397 IPC: Del HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-11-20T10:35:17+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-28T08:11:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/combined-impact-of-different-weapons-used-during-robbery-to-be-considered-for-conviction-under-section-397-ipc-del-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Combined impact of different weapons used during robbery to be considered for conviction under Section 397 IPC: Del HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":239602,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/24\/all-hc-in-case-there-is-conviction-of-less-than-5-persons-for-the-offence-of-dacoity-is-it-necessary-to-prove-that-5-or-more-persons-aided-the-crime-court-explains\/","url_meta":{"origin":205549,"position":0},"title":"All HC | In case there is conviction of less than 5 persons for the offence of ‘Dacoity’, is it necessary to prove that 5 or more persons aided the crime? Court explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J., while addressing a criminal appeal observed that \"Conviction for \"Dacoity\" of less than five persons is not sustainable in the absence of finding that five or more persons were involved in the crime\".\u00a0 Three appellants filed the criminal appeal under Section 374 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213210,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/04\/del-hc-paper-cutter-blade-not-a-deadly-weapon-so-as-to-constitute-an-offence-under-s-397-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":205549,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Paper cutter blade not a ‘deadly weapon’ so as to constitute an offence under S. 397 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A.K. Pathak, J., modified the appellant's conviction and sentence while allowing his appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby he was convicted for an offence under Section 397 IPC (robbery or dacoity, with attempt to cause death and grievous hurt). As per the victim, on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":201888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/18\/no-robbery-if-alleged-collection-of-money-by-victim-not-proved-accused-given-benefit-of-doubt-on-no-direct-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":205549,"position":2},"title":"No robbery if alleged collection of money by victim not proved; accused given benefit of doubt on no direct evidence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 18, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellants were convicted for the offence punishable under Section 392 IPC. As per the prosecution story, on the day of the incident, the complainant went\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198388,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/11\/evidence-of-a-related-witness-cannot-be-discarded-fir-is-not-an-encyclopedia-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":205549,"position":3},"title":"Evidence of a related witness cannot be discarded; FIR is not an encyclopedia: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 11, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: R. Banumathi, J. speaking for herself and Ranjan Gogoi, J. dismissed a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court wherein the order of the trial court acquitting the appellants from the charges including Section 302 IPC was reversed. According to the prosecution, the appellants\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242786,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/25\/s-6-of-probation-of-offenders-act-1958-is-mandatory-in-nature-which-acts-as-an-injunction-for-courts-to-follow-supreme-court-clarifies-legal-position\/","url_meta":{"origin":205549,"position":4},"title":"S. 6 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 is mandatory in nature, which acts as an injunction for Courts to follow; Supreme Court clarifies legal position\u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Sanjay Kishan Kaul* and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ., has observed that Section 6 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 leaves no discretion to the Court as it provides, \u201cA Court \u2018must not\u2019 sentence a person under the age of 21 years to imprisonment unless sufficient\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/25\/the-word-offender-in-section-397-ipc-envisages-individual-liability-and-not-constructive-liability\/","url_meta":{"origin":205549,"position":5},"title":"The word \u2018offender\u2019 in Section 397 IPC envisages individual liability and not constructive liability","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anu Malhotra, J., allowed a criminal petition filed against the judgment of the trial court wherein the appellant was convicted under Sections 392 and 397 IPC along with Section 27 of Arms Act. The appellant was alleged to have robbed the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205549"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205549\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}