{"id":205525,"date":"2018-11-20T10:13:33","date_gmt":"2018-11-20T04:43:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205525"},"modified":"2018-11-29T16:46:00","modified_gmt":"2018-11-29T11:16:00","slug":"some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Some guesswork is permissible for calculating income of parties while deciding application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act: Del HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Jyoti Singh, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the Family Judge whereby the appellant-husband was directed\u00a0to pay a sum of Rs 15, 000 per month as maintenance to his wife.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The respondent-wife had filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking maintenance from her husband. The Family Judge decided the quantum of maintenance as above to be paid by the husband to the wife. Aggrieved thereby, the husband filed the instant appeal. It was contended by the appellant that the Family Court did not properly appraise the facts and documents as submitted by him. It was averred that he was barely earning Rs 10,000 per month and therefore the Family Judge was not right in awarding the abovementioned amount as maintenance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court perused the record\u00a0and was of the view that the pleas taken by the appellant about his income were not believable. Similarly, for his plea regarding the salary earned by the respondent\u00a0was not supported by evidence. The Court referred to <em>Jasbir Kaur v. District Judge, Dehradun<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/UP4Z44dD\">(1997) 7 SCC 7<\/a> wherein it was held that &#8220;considering the diverse claims made by the parties one inflating the income and the other suppressing, an element of conjecture and guess work does enter for arriving at the income of the husband. It cannot be done by any mathematical precision.&#8221; It was observed that in family matters, there is a tendency of spouses no to disclose their correct and true income; the present case was no different. In such view of the matter, it was held that the quantum of maintenance as calculated by the Family Judge suffered from no infirmity. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed. [Bhuvneneshwar Sachdeva v. Kavita Sachdeva,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/L5844Nd5\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Del 12415<\/b><\/a>,dated 29-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Jyoti Singh, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32527,2641,5301,2549,32528],"class_list":["post-205525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-guess-work","tag-husband","tag-income","tag-maintenance","tag-section-24-of-the-hindu-marriage-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Some guesswork is permissible for calculating income of parties while deciding application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act: Del HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Some guesswork is permissible for calculating income of parties while deciding application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act: Del HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Jyoti Singh, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-20T04:43:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-29T11:16:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Some guesswork is permissible for calculating income of parties while deciding application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act: Del HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-20T04:43:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-29T11:16:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Some guesswork is permissible for calculating income of parties while deciding application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act: Del HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Some guesswork is permissible for calculating income of parties while deciding application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act: Del HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Some guesswork is permissible for calculating income of parties while deciding application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act: Del HC","og_description":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Jyoti Singh, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-20T04:43:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-29T11:16:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/","name":"Some guesswork is permissible for calculating income of parties while deciding application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act: Del HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-11-20T04:43:33+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-29T11:16:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/20\/some-guesswork-is-permissible-for-calculating-income-of-parties-while-deciding-application-under-section-24-of-hindu-marriage-act-del-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Some guesswork is permissible for calculating income of parties while deciding application under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act: Del HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/husband-not-allowed-to-take-benefit-of-non-disclosure-of-income-and-defeat-legitimate-right-of-wife-no-reduction-in-amount-of-maintenance-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":205525,"position":0},"title":"Husband not allowed to take benefit of non-disclosure of income and defeat legitimate right of wife; no reduction in amount of maintenance: Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and G.S. Sistani, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the husband against the award of maintenance pendente lite awarded to the wife by the family court. The instant appeal was filed by the husband under Section 19 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/raj-hc-wife-earning-a-certain-amount-will-not-absolve-husbands-liability-to-provide-maintenance-under-s-24-hma-act-1955\/","url_meta":{"origin":205525,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC |\u00a0Wife earning a certain amount will not absolve husband&#8217;s liability to provide maintenance under S. 24 HMA Act, 1955","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Mohammad Rafiq and Narendra Singh Dhaddha, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by an aggrieved husband stating that, \u201cEven if the wife earns a certain amount, that does not absolve the husband of his liability to maintain her in the meaning of Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":198452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/12\/estimation-of-husbands-income-is-permissible-while-granting-maintenance-pendente-lite-under-section-24-hindu-marriage-act-1955\/","url_meta":{"origin":205525,"position":2},"title":"Estimation of husband&#8217;s income is permissible while granting maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench comprising of M.M.S. Bedi and Anupinder Singh Grewal, JJ. allowed an application filed by the respondent-wife for maintenance pendente lite. The appellant-husband had preferred an appeal against the dismissal of his divorce petition. The respondent-wife had filed the application under Section 24\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":335761,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/23\/allahabad-hc-upholds-pendente-lite-maintenance-order-husbands-duty-support\/","url_meta":{"origin":205525,"position":3},"title":"Sacred duty of husband or father to maintain wife and children: Allahabad HC upholds Family Court&#8217;s pendente lite maintenance order","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe object of Section 24 of the Hindu Marriages Act in providing maintenance to a party in matrimonial proceedings is obviously to provide financial assistance to the spouse to maintain herself or himself during the pendency of the proceedings and also to have sufficient funds to carry on the litigation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305443,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/21\/delhi-hc-consent-of-parties-does-not-confer-validity-to-marriage-violating-section-5i-of-hindu-marriage-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":205525,"position":4},"title":"Consent of parties does not confer validity to marriage violating condition specified u\/s 5(i) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe very fact that the wife had not only claimed but also accepted pendente lite maintenance during the appeal from the first husband fortifies that the marriage was not finally dissolved.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212443,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/del-hc-s-24-hma-not-meant-to-equalise-income-of-wife-with-that-of-husband-wife-cannot-convert-husbands-income-in-indian-currency-and-seek-enhancement\/","url_meta":{"origin":205525,"position":5},"title":"Del HC | S. 24 HMA not meant to equalise income of wife with that of husband; wife cannot convert husband&#8217;s income in Indian currency and seek enhancement","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Jyoti Singh and G.S. Sistani, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the family court rejecting the appellant-wife's\u00a0application for grant of maintenance pendente\u00a0lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1951. The parties married to each-other in June 2012 and had been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205525\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}