{"id":205403,"date":"2018-11-17T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-11-17T04:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205403"},"modified":"2018-11-19T12:00:17","modified_gmt":"2018-11-19T06:30:17","slug":"bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay HC mistakenly treats operative portion of award passed by Industrial Tribunal as reference — Order set aside for apparent error: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: <\/strong>A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed a set of appeals filed against the order of the Bombay High Court whereby the writ petitions filed by the appellants was dismissed and the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal (Mumbai) was upheld.<\/p>\n

The labour Commissioner made an industrial reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the Industrial Tribunal at the instance of the worker’s association (respondents). The said reference was decided in favour of the employer (appellant). In the writ filed by the workers, the High Court set aside the said award and remanded the case to the tribunal for fresh adjudication. the tribunal, on subsequent adjudication, decided the matter in favour of the workers. This time, the employer filed a writ petition thereagainst which was dismissed by the High Court. Aggrieved thereby, the instant appeals were filed.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court was of the view that the order impugned was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded back to the High Court. The need to remand, according to the Court, was occasioned by one\u00a0factual error\u00a0<\/em>committed by the High court while dealing with submissions of the appellant. It was noticed that while dealing with submissions of the appellant, the High Court instead of quoting the reference, by mistake, quoted the operative portion of the award passed by the tribunal and treating it as a reference proceeded to examine the submissions and rejecting them. In Court’s opinion this was an error apparent on the face of the record and therefore the order impugned was liable to be set aside. Hence, the appeal was allowed and the matter was remanded back to the High Court for disposal on merits. [Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Engineering Workers’ Association,2018 SCC OnLine SC 2455<\/b><\/a>, dated 16-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed a set of appeals filed against the order of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[32482,32483,32486,32485,32484],"class_list":["post-205403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-apparent-error","tag-factual-error","tag-industrial-reference","tag-operative-portion","tag-section-10-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947"],"yoast_head":"\nBombay HC mistakenly treats operative portion of award passed by Industrial Tribunal as reference -- Order set aside for apparent error: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay HC mistakenly treats operative portion of award passed by Industrial Tribunal as reference -- Order set aside for apparent error: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed a set of appeals filed against the order of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-17T04:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-19T06:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC mistakenly treats operative portion of award passed by Industrial Tribunal as reference -- Order set aside for apparent error: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-17T04:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-19T06:30:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay HC mistakenly treats operative portion of award passed by Industrial Tribunal as reference — Order set aside for apparent error: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC mistakenly treats operative portion of award passed by Industrial Tribunal as reference -- Order set aside for apparent error: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay HC mistakenly treats operative portion of award passed by Industrial Tribunal as reference -- Order set aside for apparent error: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed a set of appeals filed against the order of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-17T04:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-19T06:30:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/","name":"Bombay HC mistakenly treats operative portion of award passed by Industrial Tribunal as reference -- Order set aside for apparent error: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-11-17T04:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-19T06:30:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/17\/bombay-hc-mistakenly-treats-operative-portion-of-award-passed-by-industrial-tribunal-as-reference-order-set-aside-for-apparent-error-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay HC mistakenly treats operative portion of award passed by Industrial Tribunal as reference — Order set aside for apparent error: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":287825,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/25\/workmen-challenging-retrenchment-order-employer-not-follow-s-25-f-industrial-disputes-act-jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":205403,"position":0},"title":"Workmen won’t be estopped from challenging retrenchment order if employer does not follow S. 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act: Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court stated that workmen can challenge their retrenchment order even after accepting retrenchment amount in case their employer has not followed the mandate of S. 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-742.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-742.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-742.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-742.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":197470,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/26\/existence-of-an-employer-employee-relationship-is-a-sine-qua-non-for-protection-under-section-33-of-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/","url_meta":{"origin":205403,"position":1},"title":"Existence of an \u2018employer-employee\u2019 relationship is a sine qua non for protection under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of S.C. Gupte, J. allowed a writ petition filed by \u2018IDBI Bank Ltd.\u2019 and dismissed the order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (Mumbai) passed in an application preferred by the respondent- workers union under Section 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/02\/nature-of-duties-and-functions-is-the-determining-factor-in-ascertaining-workman-under-the-industrial-disputes-act-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":205403,"position":2},"title":"Nature of duties and functions is the determining factor in ascertaining \u2018workman\u2019 under the Industrial Disputes Act; Bombay HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"April 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The High Court stated that dominant purpose of the employee should be considered, instead of any additional duties performed.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296443,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/11\/after-allowing-workmen-regular-service-for-over-2-decades-management-cannot-challenge-award-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":205403,"position":3},"title":"Management cannot challenge Award granting reinstatement in service after allowing workmen in regular service for over 2 decades: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"July 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A party to a proceeding cannot be permitted to challenge the Award and abide by it at its own free will; garner benefit from it; get the opposite party to effectively alter its position; and then press its challenge after the passage of a considerable length of time.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"management cannot challenge award","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/management-cannot-challenge-award.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/management-cannot-challenge-award.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/management-cannot-challenge-award.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/management-cannot-challenge-award.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239455,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/21\/hp-hc-whether-appropriate-government-while-exercising-powers-under-s-101-of-industrial-disputes-act-1947-decline-reference-to-the-tribunal-on-the-ground-of-delay-stale-claim-or\/","url_meta":{"origin":205403,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | Whether \u2018Appropriate Government\u2019 can while exercising powers under S.10(1) of ID Act decline reference to Tribunal on the ground of delay, stale claim or faded\/eclipsed dispute; larger bench to decide","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Jyotsna Rewal Dua JJ., while deciding the present matter challenging order of the State Government, referred several precedents to opine that the issue requires adjudication by a larger bench. \u00a0Background In the present bunch of writ petitions, the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":259132,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/27\/if-labour-court-orders-reinstatement-and-employer-challenges-the-said-order-is-workman-entitled-to-payment-of-full-wages-during-the-pendency-of-challenge\/","url_meta":{"origin":205403,"position":5},"title":"If Labour Court orders reinstatement and employer challenges the said order, is workman entitled to payment of full wages during pendency of challenge by employer? Del HC explains in consonance of Industrial Disputes Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Rajiv Shakdher and Talwant Singh, JJ., decided a matter with regard to payment of full wages to workman while proceedings are pending pertaining to him in the Court. Respondent 1 \u2013 workman moved the application under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205403\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}