{"id":205388,"date":"2018-11-16T18:30:51","date_gmt":"2018-11-16T13:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205388"},"modified":"2018-11-17T16:23:53","modified_gmt":"2018-11-17T10:53:53","slug":"section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Section 540 of CrPC cannot be invoked with the sole purpose of changing the effect of witness\u2019s original statement: J&#038;K HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu and Kashmir High Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta J., allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and set aside the order passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jammu.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner had been falsely charged with committing offences under Sections 376, 452 and 323 of the RPC. After the charges had been filed, the date for recording the statement of the prosecutrix was set, after the same had been constantly delayed by the prosecution. In her statement under Section 164 of the CrPC, the prosecutrix categorically denied the charges and allegations made against the petitioner. Subsequently, the prosecution declared the prosecutrix to be a hostile witness. Even during the cross-examination by the Public Prosecutor, the prosecutrix denied the charges and allegations against the petitioner and stated that she had never met him before. An application under Section 540 of the CrPC was moved by the prosecutrix through the Public Prosecutor which was vehemently opposed by the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court found that the prosecutrix had denied the contents of the seizure memos. The victim at the time of giving her statement was identified by the doctor and her husband, who she claims had forced and coerced her to give the statement, as well as threatened her against recanting the statement. The Court considered the application made by the Public Prosecutor under Section 540 of the CrPC, and stated that the most important consideration is just decision being provided by the court, and in order to do that, the essentiality of the person who is to be re-examined needs to be ascertained.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court cited the case of <em>Rajaram Prasad Yadav<\/em> <em>v.<\/em> <em>State of Bihar,<\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7yxiI9gy\">(2013) 14 SCC 461<\/a>, as the fact situation of the same was very similar to the present case. The Court stated that where the witness was re-examined for the sole purpose of changing the effect of the previous statement when no ambiguity is present, then such an application for re-examination of the witness cannot be allowed. Thus, the petition was allowed and the judgment of the Principal District and Sessions Judge was set aside. [Masoom Hussain Shah v. State,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/v5U3K85A\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 792<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 03-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta J., allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and set aside <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32478,32477,24384,13661,32476],"class_list":["post-205388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-false-charge","tag-original-statement","tag-prosecutrix","tag-re-examination","tag-section-540-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Section 540 of CrPC cannot be invoked with the sole purpose of changing the effect of witness\u2019s original statement: J&amp;K HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Section 540 of CrPC cannot be invoked with the sole purpose of changing the effect of witness\u2019s original statement: J&amp;K HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta J., allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and set aside\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-16T13:00:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-17T10:53:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Section 540 of CrPC cannot be invoked with the sole purpose of changing the effect of witness\u2019s original statement: J&K HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-16T13:00:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-17T10:53:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Section 540 of CrPC cannot be invoked with the sole purpose of changing the effect of witness\u2019s original statement: J&#038;K HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Section 540 of CrPC cannot be invoked with the sole purpose of changing the effect of witness\u2019s original statement: J&K HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Section 540 of CrPC cannot be invoked with the sole purpose of changing the effect of witness\u2019s original statement: J&K HC","og_description":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sanjay Kumar Gupta J., allowed the Criminal Revision Petition and set aside","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-16T13:00:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-17T10:53:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/","name":"Section 540 of CrPC cannot be invoked with the sole purpose of changing the effect of witness\u2019s original statement: J&K HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-11-16T13:00:51+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-17T10:53:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/16\/section-540-of-crpc-cannot-be-invoked-with-the-sole-purpose-of-changing-the-effect-of-witnesss-original-statement-jk-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Section 540 of CrPC cannot be invoked with the sole purpose of changing the effect of witness\u2019s original statement: J&#038;K HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":104961,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/11\/rape-charges-cannot-be-quashed-on-mere-retraction-of-prosecutrixs-statement\/","url_meta":{"origin":205388,"position":0},"title":"Rape charges cannot be quashed on mere retraction of prosecutrix\u2019s statement\u00a0","author":"Saba","date":"February 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While disposing of a petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, the Single Bench\u00a0of S.P. Garg, J. held that if the prosecutrix had made specific and clear allegations against the\u00a0accused to have committed rape upon her, then the criminal proceedings against the accused\u00a0cannot be quashed merely on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":343722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/17\/misuse-of-advocate-client-relationship-mp-high-court-denies-to-quash-fir-in-rape-allegations-against-advocate-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":205388,"position":1},"title":"Misuse of Advocate-Client Relationship | MP High Court refuses to quash FIR in Rape allegations against Advocate","author":"Ritu","date":"March 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cStatement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 of CrPC cannot be given preference over the FIR and the statement recorded under Section 161 of CrPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":180164,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/01\/12\/accused-granted-bail-case-s-376-ipc-considering-marriage-prosecutrix\/","url_meta":{"origin":205388,"position":2},"title":"Accused granted bail in case under S. 376 IPC, considering his marriage with prosecutrix","author":"Saba","date":"January 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Himachal Pradesh: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J., decided a criminal miscellaneous petition, wherein the petitioner-accused was granted anticipatory bail in a criminal case registered under Sections 328 and 376 of IPC, giving due consideration to the fact of marriage between the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324568,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/17\/delay-in-filing-fir-subsequent-marriage-raises-doubts-about-credibility-of-rape-allegations-mp-high-court-quashes-fir-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":205388,"position":3},"title":"No physical injuries, delayed FIR &amp; subsequent marriage: MP High Court quashes Rape charges amid doubt over prosecutrix&#8217;s credibility","author":"Ritu","date":"June 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNo reasonable person would believe the prosecutrix's allegations given the circumstances and inconsistencies in her statements.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/02\/jk-ladakh-high-court-pocso-consideration-of-bail-plea-cannot-be-deferred-indefinitely-simply-because-victim-not-appearing-in-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":205388,"position":4},"title":"[POCSO] | Consideration of bail plea cannot be deferred indefinitely simply because the victim is keeping herself away from appearing in Court: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is not the case of the prosecution that trial is being delayed because of the conduct of the accused but it is a case where the victim is avoiding stepping into the witness box.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":193915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/12\/person-cannot-allowed-incarcerate-jail-indefinite-period-proved-guilty\/","url_meta":{"origin":205388,"position":5},"title":"A person cannot be allowed to remain incarcerated in jail for an indefinite period until proved guilty","author":"Saba","date":"March 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sandeep Sharma, J., allowed a criminal petition filed under Section 438 of CrPC praying for grant of anticipatory bail, holding it to be in the interest of justice to exercise discretion in favor of the petitioner. The petitioner apprehended arrest\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205388\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}