{"id":205200,"date":"2018-11-15T19:00:06","date_gmt":"2018-11-15T13:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205200"},"modified":"2018-12-14T18:03:28","modified_gmt":"2018-12-14T12:33:28","slug":"no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/","title":{"rendered":"No case of contravention of Section 4 of\u00a0 Competition Act against BSNL in light of unresolved issues between parties: CCI"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Competition Commission of India (CCI):<\/strong> The Bench comprising of Sudhir Mital (Chairperson), Augustine Peter and U.C. Nahta, Members, gave an order in a case filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) against a company providing passive infrastructure to Telecom Service Providers (TSPs), BPOs, etc. regarding primarily to denial of access to telecom sites sought by BSNL.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, BSNL (Informant) and Indus Towers Limited (OP) were the parties involved said to have entered into an Infrastructure Sharing Agreement, through which OP agreed to provide access to the Informants on its passive infrastructure.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The allegations and submissions placed on record by the Informant were that it had been asking OP to provide feasible sites since 2016 but was denied with the same. OP is a dominant infrastructure provider with around 2588 sites in Kolkata to which only 6 sites were shared with the Informant. On bringing up the issues before the OP including payment, acceptance of fixed hourly consumption methodology and acquiring of new sites by the Informant, reluctance to resolve the same by the OP was shown.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Commission on a careful consideration to the information and submission placed on record stated in regard to the dominant position of the OP that the Commission notes the underlying principle for assessing dominance of an enterprise is linked to the market power enjoyed by it. Though market share is not a conclusive indicator, it acts as potent screening criteria. The commission was prima facie satisfied that the OP held a dominant position in the relevant market.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, coming onto the primary allegation of denial of access to sites by OP, it was noted that the Informant had earlier placed a request for 6 operational towers which implies that Informant was aware of the process for site requests. The access pending for some sites was because there were certain ongoing issues with the procedure. Therefore, Commission found that there were unresolved issues between the parties, which were germane for provision of services sought by BSNL.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, no case within provisions of Section 4 of the act was made out and allegation of denial of access to sites remained unsubstantiated. [BSNL v. Indus Towers Limited,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/y5Puk5w6\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine CCI 85<\/b><\/a>, Order dated 09-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Bench comprising of Sudhir Mital (Chairperson), Augustine Peter and U.C. Nahta, Members, gave an order in <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":76441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[32450,30493,32451,32449],"class_list":["post-205200","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-access","tag-bsnl","tag-sites","tag-telecom-service-providers"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>No case of contravention of Section 4 of\u00a0 Competition Act against BSNL in light of unresolved issues between parties: CCI | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No case of contravention of Section 4 of\u00a0 Competition Act against BSNL in light of unresolved issues between parties: CCI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Bench comprising of Sudhir Mital (Chairperson), Augustine Peter and U.C. Nahta, Members, gave an order in\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-15T13:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-14T12:33:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/\",\"name\":\"No case of contravention of Section 4 of\u00a0 Competition Act against BSNL in light of unresolved issues between parties: CCI | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-15T13:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-14T12:33:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg\",\"width\":1329,\"height\":888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No case of contravention of Section 4 of\u00a0 Competition Act against BSNL in light of unresolved issues between parties: CCI\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No case of contravention of Section 4 of\u00a0 Competition Act against BSNL in light of unresolved issues between parties: CCI | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No case of contravention of Section 4 of\u00a0 Competition Act against BSNL in light of unresolved issues between parties: CCI","og_description":"Competition Commission of India (CCI): The Bench comprising of Sudhir Mital (Chairperson), Augustine Peter and U.C. Nahta, Members, gave an order in","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-15T13:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-14T12:33:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/","name":"No case of contravention of Section 4 of\u00a0 Competition Act against BSNL in light of unresolved issues between parties: CCI | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","datePublished":"2018-11-15T13:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-14T12:33:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","width":1329,"height":888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/15\/no-case-of-contravention-of-section-4-of-competition-act-against-bsnl-in-light-of-unresolved-issues-between-parties-cci\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No case of contravention of Section 4 of\u00a0 Competition Act against BSNL in light of unresolved issues between parties: CCI"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Competition-Commission.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":284520,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/20\/delhi-high-court-directs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-bsnl-to-initiate-departmental-action-on-allegations-of-criminal-conspiracy-relating-to-tender-phase-vii-expansion-cellular-mobile-network-legalnew\/","url_meta":{"origin":205200,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court directs BSNL to initiate departmental action against officers on allegations of criminal conspiracy relating to Cellular Mobile Network&#8217;s Phase-VII Expansion tender","author":"Editor","date":"February 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Status Report submitted by CBI suggested that a departmental inquiry must be initiated against Mr. Anupam Srivastava, the then CMD, BSNL as Head of the Management Committee of BSNL for making modifications in the payment milestone without deliberating upon the efforts to acquire the sites which resulted into financial\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6329,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/02\/differential-tariffs-over-subscribers-making-calls-from-one-private-provider-to-other-private-service-provider-and-private-to-bsnl-mtnl-held-arbitrary\/","url_meta":{"origin":205200,"position":1},"title":"Differential tariffs over subscribers making calls from one private provider to other private service provider and from private network to BSNL\/MTNL held arbitrary","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 2, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: While deciding that whether the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal was right in terming the action of the private telecom service providers (forming the appellant association) for levying differential tariffs for calls made from their network to the BSNL\/MTNL networks compared to the calls made from one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215965,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/20\/ker-hc-recovery-proceedings-in-a-co-owned-property-can-be-initiated-only-against-defaulters-share-in-such-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":205200,"position":2},"title":"Ker HC | Recovery proceedings in a co-owned property can be initiated only against defaulter\u2019s share in such property","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Shaji P. Chaly, J. dismissed a petition challenging initiation of recovery proceedings against the share of the defaulter in a co-owned property. Petitioner and her husband were in joint possession of a property in Unnikkulam village. Petitioner\u2019s husband had a payment of around Rs 44 lakhs due\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6309,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/12\/24\/penalties-imposed-upon-airtel-and-vodafone-by-department-of-telecommunications-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":205200,"position":3},"title":"Penalties imposed upon Airtel and Vodafone by Department of Telecommunications, set aside","author":"Sucheta","date":"December 24, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Rs 650 crore fine on Bharti Airtel as well as Rs 100 crore on Vodafone imposed by Department of Telecommunications, has been set aside by TDSAT as the Tribunal found the penalties disproportionate to the violations of the terms of the Licence. Earlier,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242033,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/09\/ker-hc-from-promotions-to-vacancies-even-where-there-is-no-direct-recruitment-the-3-quota-for-disabled-persons-has-to-be-complied-with-hc-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":205200,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | From promotions to vacancies, even where there is no direct recruitment, the 3% quota for disabled persons has to be complied with; HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of K. Vinod Chandran and V. G. Arun, JJ., addressed the present petition filed by BSNL against the order of Central Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal had upheld the claim of the respondent for consideration of promotion as Sub Divisional Engineer (\u201cSDE\u201d) in 3% disability\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":281703,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/16\/classification-of-retirees-of-bsnl-vrs-2019-distinct-from-those-superannuating-in-normal-course-clear-violation-article-14-16-of-the-constitution-delhi-high-court-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":205200,"position":5},"title":"Classification of retirees of BSNL VRS-2019 as distinct from those superannuating in normal course is a clear violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"January 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that the engagement of BSNL VRS-2019 retirees in any Central Public Sector Enterprises\/Government department on contractual\/consultancy basis, for which the retired employees on superannuation in due course were eligible for consideration, was not in violation of Clause 8 (iii) of BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme-2019.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205200","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205200"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205200\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205200"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205200"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205200"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}