{"id":205047,"date":"2018-11-13T11:03:26","date_gmt":"2018-11-13T05:33:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=205047"},"modified":"2018-11-13T11:03:26","modified_gmt":"2018-11-13T05:33:26","slug":"determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Determination of the merits of a non-refoulement claim is a matter for the Director and the Board, not for the Court"},"content":{"rendered":"

High Court of The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region:<\/strong> A Bench comprising of Hon Yeung Ag CJHC, Hon Poon and Pang JJA., dismissed the appeal of the applicant as he was unable to discharge the burden upon him to prove the said inflicted harm upon him.<\/p>\n

The applicant was an Indian national who sought entry to Hong Kong from Delhi on strength of his passport at the airport. While pending his removal to Delhi, he filed a non-refoulement claim on account of being harmed or likely to be killed by a said majority party in India as he refused to be a supporter of the same.<\/p>\n

Further, his claim was rejected by the Director of Immigration on assessing the risk involved to be low as he reasoned it with the party person having ample opportunity to do so but what was claimed to may happen didn\u2019t really had the weightage to allow the applicant his desired claim. Also, it was considered that the availability of state protection and the possibility of relocation would further lower or negate the perceived risk. The applicant had also failed to establish his non-refoulement claim under all applicable grounds.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, after considering the facts, the Court was satisfied that the decisions of the Director and the Board were justified. Hence on account of no legal error and fairness in the process, the leave to apply for judicial review had been refused. The appeal was dismissed.[Maninder Singh, In re, [2018] HKCA 733, order dated 31-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

High Court of The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: A Bench comprising of Hon Yeung Ag CJHC, Hon Poon and Pang JJA., <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":205048,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[3042,32407,32406],"class_list":["post-205047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-Judicial_Review","tag-legal-error","tag-non-refoulment-claim"],"yoast_head":"\nDetermination of the merits of a non-refoulement claim is a matter for the Director and the Board, not for the Court | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Determination of the merits of a non-refoulement claim is a matter for the Director and the Board, not for the Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"High Court of The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: A Bench comprising of Hon Yeung Ag CJHC, Hon Poon and Pang JJA.,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-13T05:33:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/4c4bae46-363b-11e7-8663-b22bc7352b12_1280x720_204440.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/\",\"name\":\"Determination of the merits of a non-refoulement claim is a matter for the Director and the Board, not for the Court | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/4c4bae46-363b-11e7-8663-b22bc7352b12_1280x720_204440.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-13T05:33:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/4c4bae46-363b-11e7-8663-b22bc7352b12_1280x720_204440.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/4c4bae46-363b-11e7-8663-b22bc7352b12_1280x720_204440.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Determination of the merits of a non-refoulement claim is a matter for the Director and the Board, not for the Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Determination of the merits of a non-refoulement claim is a matter for the Director and the Board, not for the Court | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Determination of the merits of a non-refoulement claim is a matter for the Director and the Board, not for the Court","og_description":"High Court of The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: A Bench comprising of Hon Yeung Ag CJHC, Hon Poon and Pang JJA.,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-13T05:33:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/4c4bae46-363b-11e7-8663-b22bc7352b12_1280x720_204440.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/","name":"Determination of the merits of a non-refoulement claim is a matter for the Director and the Board, not for the Court | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/4c4bae46-363b-11e7-8663-b22bc7352b12_1280x720_204440.jpg","datePublished":"2018-11-13T05:33:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/4c4bae46-363b-11e7-8663-b22bc7352b12_1280x720_204440.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/4c4bae46-363b-11e7-8663-b22bc7352b12_1280x720_204440.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/13\/determination-of-the-merits-of-a-non-refoulement-claim-is-a-matter-for-the-director-and-the-board-not-for-the-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Determination of the merits of a non-refoulement claim is a matter for the Director and the Board, not for the Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/4c4bae46-363b-11e7-8663-b22bc7352b12_1280x720_204440.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":307355,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/17\/rwanda-policy-migrants-asylum-seekers-unlawful-politics-brexit-supreme-court-uk-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":205047,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Rwanda Policy\u2019 for asylum seekers held unlawful; UK Supreme Court upholds decision of Court of Appeal","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court took the decision to uphold the Court of Appeal\u2019s findings regardless of the political debates surrounding the Rwanda Policy.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rwanda Policy migrants","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Rwanda-Policy-migrants.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Rwanda-Policy-migrants.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Rwanda-Policy-migrants.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Rwanda-Policy-migrants.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334039,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/28\/delhi-hc-refuses-interfere-judgment-in-favour-ocl-nominated-authority-let-claim-get-extinguished-without-protest\/","url_meta":{"origin":205047,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Nominated Authority let its claim get extinguished without protest\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to interfere with judgment in favour of OCL Iron and Steel Ltd.","author":"Editor","date":"October 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u2018As per the \u2018clean slate\u2019 principle \u2014 to get a fresh breath, the successful Resolution Applicant is permitted to proceed in resurrecting the \u2018on-going concern\u2019 and no surprise claims are flung upon it, lest the effort of revitalizing and restarting the Corporate Debtor are wasted.\u2019","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":172134,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/29\/quasi-judicial-order-can-passed-giving-opportunity-hearing-applicant\/","url_meta":{"origin":205047,"position":2},"title":"Quasi-judicial order can be passed only after giving an opportunity of hearing to applicant","author":"Saba","date":"November 29, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a Single Judge Bench comprising of Dr. Vineet Kothari, J. set aside the impugned order passed by the respondent-Foreign Trade Development Officer, holding that it did not meet the requirements of principles of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":314601,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/19\/beyond-words-patent-applicant-controller-must-substance-of-claim-madras-hc-remanded-matter-controller-de-novo-consideration-amended-claim\/","url_meta":{"origin":205047,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Controller must look into the substance of claim beyond choice of words of patent applicant\u2019: Madras HC remands matter to Controller for de novo consideration","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court said that the Controller appears to have made short of his responsibility by merely extracting the priors he relied on but had not thought it fit to consider the explanations.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300530,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/01\/bombay-high-court-claim-cannot-rejected-for-not-taking-prior-permission-official-liquidator\/","url_meta":{"origin":205047,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court| Claim cannot be rejected simply because prior permission of Liquidator was not taken for rendering emergency services","author":"Arunima","date":"September 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court observed that the ship was guarded by the applicant on the guidance of Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai and there is no reason why the Official Liquidator shall later drag its feet in disbursing the amount as per the invoice which has been already\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"bombay high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":246762,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/08\/rohingya-refugees-not-to-be-deported-unless-the-procedure-prescribed-for-such-deportation-is-followed-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":205047,"position":5},"title":"Rohingya Refugees not to be deported unless the procedure prescribed for such deportation is followed: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Right not to be deported, is ancillary or concomitant to the right to reside or settle in any part of the territory of India.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=205047"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/205047\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/205048"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=205047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=205047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=205047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}