{"id":204809,"date":"2018-11-03T16:15:34","date_gmt":"2018-11-03T10:45:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=204809"},"modified":"2018-11-12T15:03:35","modified_gmt":"2018-11-12T09:33:35","slug":"prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/","title":{"rendered":"Prior enquiry by executive authorities cannot oust the jurisdiction of Lokayukta to conduct enquiry on the same issue"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/strong>: A Single Judge Bench of Sheel Nagu, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order passed by the respondent authorities whereby an enquiry was ordered against the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The main issue that arose before the Court was whether the petition was maintainable<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that it is an accepted fact that two similar enquiries were earlier held by two different authorities against the petitioner. In both these enquiries, nothing was found against the petitioner who is a retired government servant. However, it is also an undisputed fact that those previous enquiries were conducted by different executive authorities and not by the Lokayukta Organization. The Lokayukta has vast powers to conduct enquiries in cases related to alleged economic offences against any serving or retired government employee and this statutory power cannot be denied to the Lokayukta.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that a mere enquiry under Section 10 of the Madhya Pradesh Lokayukta Avam Up-Lokayukta Adhiniyam, 1981 does not cause any prejudice to the petitioner and hence he has no right to agitate in the writ petition. Resultantly, the petition was held not maintainable and dismissed with a direction to the Lokayukta authorities to ensure due respect and care to the petitioner, during the course of enquiry, on account of him being a senior citizen and a retired employee.[Mahendra Kumar Jain v. Special Police Establishment Lokayukta,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/H76lZ0S1\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine MP 796<\/b><\/a>, order dated 01-11-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sheel Nagu, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order passed by <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204809","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Prior enquiry by executive authorities cannot oust the jurisdiction of Lokayukta to conduct enquiry on the same issue | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prior enquiry by executive authorities cannot oust the jurisdiction of Lokayukta to conduct enquiry on the same issue\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sheel Nagu, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order passed by\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-03T10:45:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-12T09:33:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/\",\"name\":\"Prior enquiry by executive authorities cannot oust the jurisdiction of Lokayukta to conduct enquiry on the same issue | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-03T10:45:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-12T09:33:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prior enquiry by executive authorities cannot oust the jurisdiction of Lokayukta to conduct enquiry on the same issue\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prior enquiry by executive authorities cannot oust the jurisdiction of Lokayukta to conduct enquiry on the same issue | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prior enquiry by executive authorities cannot oust the jurisdiction of Lokayukta to conduct enquiry on the same issue","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Sheel Nagu, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order passed by","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-03T10:45:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-12T09:33:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/","name":"Prior enquiry by executive authorities cannot oust the jurisdiction of Lokayukta to conduct enquiry on the same issue | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-11-03T10:45:34+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-12T09:33:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/prior-enquiry-by-executive-authorities-cannot-oust-the-jurisdiction-of-lokayukta-to-conduct-enquiry-on-the-same-issue\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prior enquiry by executive authorities cannot oust the jurisdiction of Lokayukta to conduct enquiry on the same issue"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":238148,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/29\/ori-hc-matter-pending-adjudication-before-court-is-no-bar-for-lokayukta-to-exercise-its-powers-under-s-20-6-of-odisha-lokayukta-act-2014\/","url_meta":{"origin":204809,"position":0},"title":"Ori HC | Matter pending adjudication before Court is no bar for Lokayukta to exercise its powers under S. 20 (6) of Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014","author":"Editor","date":"October 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Division Bench of Mohammed Rafiq and B. R. Sarangi, JJ.,\u00a0 dismissed the petition and vacated the interim order. \u00a0The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is a private limited company, registered under Companies Act was awarded the work \u201cConstruction of HL bridge over\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":237632,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/17\/kar-hc-immediate-termination-without-any-disciplinary-enquiry-by-the-department-concerned-runs-contrary-to-the-statutory-principles-of-service-law-writ-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":204809,"position":1},"title":"Kar HC | Immediate termination, without any disciplinary enquiry by the department concerned runs contrary to the statutory principles of Service Law; Writ Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"October 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: P.B. Bajanthri, while allowing the present writ petition against the termination of services without any disciplinary enquiry, reiterated the settled precedents and further vested the liberty to conduct the said enquiry, now, with the respondent authority, in accordance with law. Brief Facts The facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244206,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/22\/corruption\/","url_meta":{"origin":204809,"position":2},"title":"Tri HC | Once material has come to Government notice prima facie indicating that there was some corrupt practice, Government is duty-bound to act on the same; Court maintains departmental inquiry","author":"Editor","date":"February 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Tripura High Court: Akil Kureshi, CJ., disposed of a writ petition which was filed challenging a departmental inquiry and suspension pending such departmental inquiry against the petitioner. Petitioner was a Junior Engineer in the Government of Tripura. A complaint was made against him holding assets disproportionate to his known source\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":144031,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/07\/24\/failure-of-authorities-to-issue-notice-of-enquiry-to-its-employees-is-violative-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":204809,"position":3},"title":"Failure of authorities to issue notice of enquiry to its employees is violative of principles of natural justice","author":"Saba","date":"July 24, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court for States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh: In a writ petition filed, questioning the validity and legal sustainability of an award of the Labour Court, a Single Judge Bench comprising of A.V. Sesha Sai, J. held that the Labour Court had not exercised its jurisdiction under S. 11-A\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":73561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/26\/investigation-against-husna-and-naseemuddin-siddiqui-for-holding-disproportionate-assets-to-be-completed-within-6-months\/","url_meta":{"origin":204809,"position":4},"title":"Investigation against Husna and Naseemuddin Siddiqui for holding disproportionate assets to be completed within 6 months","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 26, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the petition praying for implementation of the recommendation\/report of the Lokayukta Uttar Pradesh, dated 22nd February, 2012, the Court noticed that the law enforcement agencies have moved into action and have collected information and material including with reference to the representations and affidavits received in the course\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240893,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/18\/kar-hc-interpreting-the-term-enquiry-under-s-43a-of-karnataka-panchayatraj-act-1993-court-lays-strict-emphasis-on-procedural-compliance-before-any-state-action-of-removal-petiti\/","url_meta":{"origin":204809,"position":5},"title":"Kar HC | Interpreting the term \u2018enquiry\u2019 under S. 43A of Karnataka Panchayatraj Act 1993, Court lays strict emphasis on procedural compliance before any State Action of removal; Petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"December 18, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of G. Narendar and M.I. Arun JJ., allowing the present petition, discussed the meaning, scope and ambit of the word \u2018enquiry\u2019 and provisional application of Section 43-A of the Karnataka Panchayatraj Act, 1993. Background A complaint was lodged against the petitioners before Lokayukta, on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204809","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204809"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204809\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204809"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}