{"id":204606,"date":"2018-11-01T14:15:39","date_gmt":"2018-11-01T08:45:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=204606"},"modified":"2018-11-05T16:56:10","modified_gmt":"2018-11-05T11:26:10","slug":"karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/","title":{"rendered":"Karnataka HC declines to entertain PIL pertaining to encroachments on public roads holding that the same required determination of questions of fact"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> A Division bench comprising of Dinesh Maheswari and S.G. Pandit, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition declined to exercise its jurisdiction under public interest litigation since the petition involved the determination of questions of fact.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The instant writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records pertaining to the case on hand and seeking a direction against the respondent State to clear the road by removing encroachments made on public roads.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The court, on the day of preliminary hearing, stated that it was not persuaded to entertain the present petition as a public interest litigation (PIL) because though the petition alleged several encroachments on public pathway and roads but none of the alleged encroachers had been impleaded as a party to the said petition, not even in a representative capacity. Further, it was noted that the matter involved questions of fact which could not be determined in the PIL jurisdiction of the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">With the aforesaid observations and noting, the court dismissed the present petition with a liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate remedies in accordance with law. [Chaitanya Mandal v. State of Karnataka,<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nQWSgBh2\"><b>2018 SCC OnLine Kar 1755<\/b><\/a>, decided on 23-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court: A Division bench comprising of Dinesh Maheswari and S.G. Pandit, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition declined to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3457,2554,11321,6931],"class_list":["post-204606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-encroachment","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-pil","tag-public-roads"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Karnataka HC declines to entertain PIL pertaining to encroachments on public roads holding that the same required determination of questions of fact | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karnataka HC declines to entertain PIL pertaining to encroachments on public roads holding that the same required determination of questions of fact\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: A Division bench comprising of Dinesh Maheswari and S.G. Pandit, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition declined to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-11-01T08:45:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-05T11:26:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/\",\"name\":\"Karnataka HC declines to entertain PIL pertaining to encroachments on public roads holding that the same required determination of questions of fact | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-11-01T08:45:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-05T11:26:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karnataka HC declines to entertain PIL pertaining to encroachments on public roads holding that the same required determination of questions of fact\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karnataka HC declines to entertain PIL pertaining to encroachments on public roads holding that the same required determination of questions of fact | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karnataka HC declines to entertain PIL pertaining to encroachments on public roads holding that the same required determination of questions of fact","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: A Division bench comprising of Dinesh Maheswari and S.G. Pandit, JJ. while hearing a civil writ petition declined to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-11-01T08:45:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-05T11:26:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/","name":"Karnataka HC declines to entertain PIL pertaining to encroachments on public roads holding that the same required determination of questions of fact | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-11-01T08:45:39+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-05T11:26:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/01\/karnataka-hc-declines-to-entertain-pil-pertaining-to-encroachments-on-public-roads-holding-that-the-same-required-determination-of-questions-of-fact\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karnataka HC declines to entertain PIL pertaining to encroachments on public roads holding that the same required determination of questions of fact"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":263298,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/09\/raj-hc-citizen-approaching-court-in-a-public-interest-jurisdiction-holds-greater-duty-to-make-full-research-pil-dismissed-due-to-lack-of-necessary-evidence-presented\/","url_meta":{"origin":204606,"position":0},"title":"Raj HC | \u201cCitizen approaching Court in a public interest jurisdiction holds greater duty to make full research\u201d PIL dismissed due to lack of necessary evidence presented","author":"Editor","date":"March 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Akil Kureshi, CJ and Rekha Borana, J. dismissed the petition and kept it open for the petitioners to file a fresh public interest petition. A PIL was filed by the petitioners sustaining serious allegations with respect to mismanagement of respondent 2 Arth Credit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206198,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/sinister-act-of-wife-seeking-remedy-through-pil-to-foster-personal-vendetta-against-husband-not-in-public-interest-petition-declined-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":204606,"position":1},"title":"Sinister act of wife seeking remedy through PIL to foster personal vendetta against husband not in public interest: Karnataka HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dinesh Maheshwari, CJ and S. Sujatha, JJ. dismissed a PIL and condemned the act of petitioner wife who had filed the said petition for her personal interests in the garb of public interest. The instant petition was filed praying for a writ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":256832,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/08\/raj-hc-issued-directions-to-provide-a-pan-rajasthan-solution-for-persisting-problem-of-encroachment-on-the-land-of-public-way\/","url_meta":{"origin":204606,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC issued directions to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution for persisting problem of encroachment on the land of public way, johar paitan, river bed etc.","author":"Editor","date":"November 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Vinit Kumar Mathur and Sangeet Lodha, JJ., disposed of the petition and issued directions to the respondents to remove encroachments made over the land in question.\u00a0 The instant petition was filed by the petitioners seeking directions to the respondents to remove encroachments made\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":277567,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/15\/allahabad-high-court-petitioner-not-able-to-establish-that-process-of-determination-of-tariff-by-regulatory-commission-was-vitiated-of-the-vice-of-conflict-of-interest-dismis\/","url_meta":{"origin":204606,"position":3},"title":"Allahabad High Court dismissed PIL as Petitioner fails to establish that process of determination of tariff by Regulatory Commission was vitiated due to conflict of interest","author":"Editor","date":"November 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad High Court: In a public interest litigation filed by a Non-Governmental Organization (\u2018NGO') for restraining the Regulatory Commission from going ahead with the final tariff for the Lalitpur Power Generation Company Limited (\u2018LPGC Ltd.'), the division bench of Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Saurabh Srivastava, JJ. while dismissing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/17\/patna-high-court-chancellor-universities-of-bihar-article-226-constitution-of-india-illegal-appointments-public-interest-litigation-remedies-writ-jurisdiction-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":204606,"position":4},"title":"Patna High Court directs the Chancellor, Universities of Bihar to consider and decide issues pertaining to illegal appointments of Vice-Chancellors","author":"Editor","date":"September 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: In a writ petition filed for the quashing of the illegal appointments of Vice-Chancellors, Pro Vice Chancellors and other officers of the Universities of State of Bihar, the division bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ. and S. Kumar, J. has without expressing any opinion on merits disposed of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patna High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/patna_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":249883,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/17\/covid-19-10\/","url_meta":{"origin":204606,"position":5},"title":"Kar HC | Freedom struggle cannot be compared to the lockdown imposed due to COVID \u2013 19 pandemic; Misuse of PIL a serious concern","author":"Editor","date":"June 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma and M. Nagaprasanna, JJ., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is an Advocate and a trade unionist as well as a social activist who filed this present public interest\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204606"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204606\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}