{"id":204534,"date":"2018-10-30T14:15:55","date_gmt":"2018-10-30T08:45:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=204534"},"modified":"2018-10-31T16:39:31","modified_gmt":"2018-10-31T11:09:31","slug":"adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/","title":{"rendered":"Adjudication of a case must be after due consideration of oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the parties to the lis"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar, J. while hearing an appeal against dismissal of application for setting aside decree of trial court in a title suit, ruled that consideration of a case and rendering of a decision must be based on appreciation of all the facts, materials and evidence on record.<\/p>\n

Petitioner had filed a title suit against respondent for specific performance of the contract which was decreed ex-parte. Respondent\u2019s application to set aside the said decree was dismissed in default. Thereafter, she filed a miscellaneous case for the restoration of her application on the ground that she could not appear before the trial court for several months on account of her illness. A medical certificate in support of her contention was annexed with her pleadings.<\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that the parties were litigating in another case where the respondent was appearing continuously and as such her claim of illness was false and the medical certificate had been procured fraudulently from the doctor.<\/p>\n

The High Court noted that the trial court had not considered the witness accounts and the documents filed by appellant and respondent and the case had been allowed without proper appreciation of materials on record. The only document considered by court was the medical certificate which showed that the respondent was suffering from jaundice. The trial court had neither discussed the oral evidence of parties nor the other relevant documents on record for deciding the issues involved in the matter.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the instant petition was allowed and trial court\u2019s order dismissing respondent\u2019s application was set aside. The matter was remitted to trial court for disposing of the application after due consideration of oral and documentary evidence adduced on behalf of both the parties. [Gopal Mahto v. Shyama Devi,2018 SCC OnLine Pat 1907<\/b><\/a>, decided on 11-09-2018]<\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar, J. while hearing an appeal against dismissal of application for setting <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32275,2521,32274,32276],"class_list":["post-204534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-documentary","tag-Evidence","tag-oral","tag-specific-performance-contract"],"yoast_head":"\nAdjudication of a case must be after due consideration of oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the parties to the lis | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Adjudication of a case must be after due consideration of oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the parties to the lis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar, J. while hearing an appeal against dismissal of application for setting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-30T08:45:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-31T11:09:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/\",\"name\":\"Adjudication of a case must be after due consideration of oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the parties to the lis | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-30T08:45:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-31T11:09:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Adjudication of a case must be after due consideration of oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the parties to the lis\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Adjudication of a case must be after due consideration of oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the parties to the lis | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Adjudication of a case must be after due consideration of oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the parties to the lis","og_description":"Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar, J. while hearing an appeal against dismissal of application for setting","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-30T08:45:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-31T11:09:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/","name":"Adjudication of a case must be after due consideration of oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the parties to the lis | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-30T08:45:55+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-31T11:09:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/adjudication-of-a-case-must-be-after-due-consideration-of-oral-and-documentary-evidence-adduced-by-both-the-parties-to-the-lis\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Adjudication of a case must be after due consideration of oral and documentary evidence adduced by both the parties to the lis"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255469,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/12\/decree-of-specific-performance\/","url_meta":{"origin":204534,"position":0},"title":"Law on Specific Performance | For purpose of passing a decree of specific performance, what is essential? SC explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Stating that readiness and willingness are necessary for the purpose of passing a decree of specific performance, Division Bench of M.R. Shah and A.S. Bopanna, JJ., expressed that, Straightaway to rely upon the affidavit without amending the plaint and the pleadings is wholly impermissible under the law. Factual\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/18\/whether-appellant-was-ready-and-willing-to-perform-the-part-of-his-contract-entitling-him-for-specific-performance-of-the-agreement-supreme-courts-split\/","url_meta":{"origin":204534,"position":1},"title":"Specific Performance| Supreme Court’s split verdict over a party’s readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract","author":"Editor","date":"January 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While Justice Shah stated that the Kerala High Court has erred in interfering with the judgment of Trial Court of passing a decree for specific performance; Justice Nagarathna affirmed the Judgment of the High Court.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-128.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":205859,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/28\/parties-to-a-suit-must-stand-on-their-own-legs-and-it-is-the-primary-responsibility-of-the-party-taking-a-specific-stand-to-prove-his-stand-by-leading-evidence-oral-as-well-as-documentary\/","url_meta":{"origin":204534,"position":2},"title":"Parties to a suit must stand on their own legs and prove their specific stand","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Shree Chandrashekhar, J., dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby petitioner\u2019s application for a direction upon the respondent to produce a copy of the letter dated 04-07-2009 has been rejected. The main issue that arose\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":210950,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/26\/pat-hc-production-of-additional-documents-allowed-if-the-concerned-party-could-not-produce-such-evidence-despite-due-diligence\/","url_meta":{"origin":204534,"position":3},"title":"Pat HC | Production of additional documents allowed if the concerned party could not produce such evidence despite due diligence","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Prabhat Kumar Jha, J. dismissed a petition filed against an order allowing production of additional documents. Petitioner herein filed an eviction suit against one Rajendra Mistri, which was decreed in his favour. Respondents herein (who are widow and sons of Rajendra Mistri) filed an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268455,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/15\/a-suit-cannot-be-summarily-decreed-until-the-claim-stands-duly-proved-mad-hc-analyses-rules-of-evidence-vis-a-vis-order-xiii-a-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":204534,"position":4},"title":"A suit cannot be summarily decreed until the claim stands duly proved; Mad HC analyses Rules of Evidence Vis a Vis Order XIII A CPC","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Senthil Kumar Ramamoorthy, J. remarked that a suit cannot be summarily decreed at the instance of a plaintiff unless such plaintiff satisfies the court that the suit claim stands duly proved.\u00a0 The facts of the case are such that the first defendant borrowed money from the Plaintiff\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Madras-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304689,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/procedural-technicalities-should-not-override-substantive-provisions-of-law-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":204534,"position":5},"title":"\u201cProcedural technicalities should not override substantive provisions of law\u201d, Calcutta High Court affirms ex-parte eviction decree","author":"Ritu","date":"October 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The first appellate court's decision to set aside the ex-parte decree and remand the case was seen as unnecessary and not in line with the purpose of Order 18 Rule 4 of CPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204534"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204534\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}