{"id":204523,"date":"2018-10-30T09:48:24","date_gmt":"2018-10-30T04:18:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=204523"},"modified":"2018-11-01T12:45:58","modified_gmt":"2018-11-01T07:15:58","slug":"charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Charge to be framed not on suspicion simpliciter but on grave suspicion of involvement in alleged offence; order of discharge upheld: Delhi HC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court:<\/strong> A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed by the prosecution against the order of the trial judge whereby he declined to frame charge against the respondents in a criminal case.<\/p>\n

The case was registered vide an FIR under Sections 147, 148, 149, 308, 506 and 34 IPC. The case was investigated into and the charge sheet was filed wherein it was specifically mentioned that after investigation, the presence of the respondents was not established on the scene of that incident. However, respondents were arrayed solely on the basis of statement made by the father of the complainant. The trial court noted that the respondents were not found present at the spot during alleged incident and accordingly discharged the respondents from all offences under the FIR. Aggrieved thereby, the prosecution preferred the instant appeal.<\/p>\n

The High Court, at the outset, observed it to be settled principle of law that the charge has to be framed not only on suspicion but grave suspicion of involvement of the accused in the commission of the offence. On perusal of the record, as also the fact that respondents were not named in FIR by the complainant and even investigation revealed that they were not present at the spot, the Court found no infirmity in the view taken by the trial court in discharging the respondents of all the offences. The Court was satisfied that there was no material on record to raise grave suspicion against the respondents of having committed the said offence. In view of the aforesaid, the petition was dismissed. [State (NCT of Delhi) v. Amit,2018 SCC OnLine Del 12076<\/b><\/a>, dated 26-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed by the prosecution against the order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32265,32266,32264],"class_list":["post-204523","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-grave-suspicion","tag-order-of-discharge","tag-suspicion-simpliciter"],"yoast_head":"\nCharge to be framed not on suspicion simpliciter but on grave suspicion of involvement in alleged offence; order of discharge upheld: Delhi HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Charge to be framed not on suspicion simpliciter but on grave suspicion of involvement in alleged offence; order of discharge upheld: Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed by the prosecution against the order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-30T04:18:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-01T07:15:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Charge to be framed not on suspicion simpliciter but on grave suspicion of involvement in alleged offence; order of discharge upheld: Delhi HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-30T04:18:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-01T07:15:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Charge to be framed not on suspicion simpliciter but on grave suspicion of involvement in alleged offence; order of discharge upheld: Delhi HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Charge to be framed not on suspicion simpliciter but on grave suspicion of involvement in alleged offence; order of discharge upheld: Delhi HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Charge to be framed not on suspicion simpliciter but on grave suspicion of involvement in alleged offence; order of discharge upheld: Delhi HC","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. dismissed a petition filed by the prosecution against the order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-30T04:18:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-01T07:15:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/","name":"Charge to be framed not on suspicion simpliciter but on grave suspicion of involvement in alleged offence; order of discharge upheld: Delhi HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-30T04:18:24+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-01T07:15:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/30\/charge-to-be-framed-not-on-suspicion-simpliciter-but-on-grave-suspicion-of-involvement-in-alleged-offence-order-of-discharge-upheld-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Charge to be framed not on suspicion simpliciter but on grave suspicion of involvement in alleged offence; order of discharge upheld: Delhi HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":355030,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/calling-jk-occupied-territory-inciting-secession-unlawful-activity-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":204523,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Incitement of secession, calling J&K an \u2018occupied territory\u2019 is unlawful activity\u2019; J&K and Ladakh HC sets aside discharge of accused","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere there are two views, one giving rise to mere suspicion and the other to grave suspicion, the Judge would be justified in refusing discharge if satisfied that strong suspicion exists. The existence of some essential material giving rise to strong suspicion necessary for drawing a charge and refusing discharge\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"inciting J&K secession unlawful activity","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inciting-JK-secession-unlawful-activity.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inciting-JK-secession-unlawful-activity.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inciting-JK-secession-unlawful-activity.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/inciting-JK-secession-unlawful-activity.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":377771,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/09\/del-hc-issues-notice-cbis-challenge-to-discharge-delhi-excise-policy-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":204523,"position":1},"title":"Delhi Excise Policy Case | Delhi High Court issues notice to Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 others on CBI\u2019s plea challenging discharge","author":"Ritu","date":"March 9, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe observations limited only qua the Investigating Officer are stayed, till the next date of hearing, including the direction recommending departmental action against him.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi Excise Policy Case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Delhi-Excise-Policy-Case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Delhi-Excise-Policy-Case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Delhi-Excise-Policy-Case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Delhi-Excise-Policy-Case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":190564,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/17\/suspicion-however-strong-cannot-take-place-proof\/","url_meta":{"origin":204523,"position":2},"title":"Suspicion, however strong, cannot take the place of proof","author":"Saba","date":"February 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: An appeal against the order of acquittal filed by the State was decided by a Division Bench comprising of Prashant Kumar Mishra and Ram Prasanna Sharma, JJ., wherein acquittal of the respondents as ordered by the Sessions Judge was upheld. The respondents were accused in a criminal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":370748,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/24\/del-hc-issues-directions-on-misuse-of-victim-compensation-scheme-in-sexual-offences\/","url_meta":{"origin":204523,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court issues directions against misuse of victim compensation scheme in sexual offences","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"December 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Where prosecutrix unequivocally resiles from allegations in a voluntary statement under Section 164 CrPC, no grave suspicion survives to warrant framing of charges under Sections 328 and 376 of the IPC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"misuse of victim compensation scheme in sexual offences","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/misuse-of-victim-compensation-scheme-in-sexual-offences.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/misuse-of-victim-compensation-scheme-in-sexual-offences.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/misuse-of-victim-compensation-scheme-in-sexual-offences.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/misuse-of-victim-compensation-scheme-in-sexual-offences.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":340509,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/05\/delhi-hc-dismisses-challenge-to-discharge-in-sexual-assault-case-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":204523,"position":4},"title":"Mere threats not with intention to cause alarm would not constitute criminal intimidation; Delhi High Court upholds discharge of accused in sexual assault case","author":"Arunima","date":"February 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"While framing of charges, the Court ought to look at the limited aspect of whether, given the material placed before it, there is grave suspicion against the accused which is not properly explained. Though, for the purpose of conviction, the same must be proved beyond reasonable doubt.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213565,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/11\/ph-hc-suspicion-however-strong-cannot-take-place-of-the-positive-proof-and-cannot-be-made-basis-of-conviction\/","url_meta":{"origin":204523,"position":5},"title":"P&H HC | Suspicion, however strong, cannot take place of the positive proof and cannot be made basis of conviction","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab And Haryana High Court: The Bench of Rajiv Sharma and Kuldip Singh, JJ., dismissed the application filed under Section 378(4) CrPC against the Judgment passed by the Additional Sessions Judge acquitting the accused-respondents of the charges framed against them under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204523"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204523\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}