{"id":204457,"date":"2018-10-28T14:00:31","date_gmt":"2018-10-28T08:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=204457"},"modified":"2018-11-01T12:14:49","modified_gmt":"2018-11-01T06:44:49","slug":"application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/","title":{"rendered":"Application to set aside ex-parte divorce decree by a spouse is not rendered infructuous by remarriage of opposite spouse"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court:<\/b> A Division Bench comprising of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. while hearing a matrimonial appeal ruled that remarriage by the opposite spouse during pendency of an application for setting aside ex-parte divorce decree would not render such application as infructuous.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The appellant-husband was granted an ex-parte divorce decree against which the respondent-wife filed an application to set aside the said decree along with an application for condonation of delay of 48 days. By that time, the appellant had married another woman. Respondent\u2019s submission before the Family Court was that she had delivered a premature baby through cesarean operation during the hearing of case due to which she could not enter her appearance before the court. Appellant\u2019s contention was that he had remarried after the grant of divorce decree and therefore the application for setting aside the ex-parte decree had become infructuous. The Family Court allowed respondent\u2019s applications and set aside the divorce decree, against which order the appellant preferred the instant appeal.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The High Court refused to interfere with the findings of fact of Family Court and noted that the appellant had remarried after receiving notice in the application for setting aside the divorce decree and during the pendency of that application. Relying on the dictum of Apex Court in Chandra Mohini Srivastava v. Avinash Prasad Srivastava, <\/i>(1967) 1 SCR 864<\/a> the court held that remarriage of a spouse who obtained ex-parte divorce decree would not render the application filed by opposite spouse for setting aside the ex-parte decree, as infructuous and the said application must be considered on its own merits notwithstanding the remarriage. However, Family Court\u2019s observation that remarriage by appellant could amount to bigamy, was dismissed as unwarranted. Thus, the instant appeal was dismissed.\u00a0<\/span>[Denny Pazhoor v. Greeta Sunitha Vincent,2018 SCC OnLine Ker 3921<\/b><\/a>, decided on 17-10-2018]\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. while hearing a matrimonial appeal ruled <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32246,32247,3373],"class_list":["post-204457","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ex-parte-divorce-decree","tag-remarriage","tag-spouse"],"yoast_head":"\nApplication to set aside ex-parte divorce decree by a spouse is not rendered infructuous by remarriage of opposite spouse | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Application to set aside ex-parte divorce decree by a spouse is not rendered infructuous by remarriage of opposite spouse\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. while hearing a matrimonial appeal ruled\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-28T08:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-01T06:44:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/\",\"name\":\"Application to set aside ex-parte divorce decree by a spouse is not rendered infructuous by remarriage of opposite spouse | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-28T08:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-01T06:44:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Application to set aside ex-parte divorce decree by a spouse is not rendered infructuous by remarriage of opposite spouse\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Application to set aside ex-parte divorce decree by a spouse is not rendered infructuous by remarriage of opposite spouse | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Application to set aside ex-parte divorce decree by a spouse is not rendered infructuous by remarriage of opposite spouse","og_description":"Kerala High Court: A Division Bench comprising of C.K. Abdul Rehim and R. Narayana Pisharadi, JJ. while hearing a matrimonial appeal ruled","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-28T08:30:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-01T06:44:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/","name":"Application to set aside ex-parte divorce decree by a spouse is not rendered infructuous by remarriage of opposite spouse | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-28T08:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-01T06:44:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/28\/application-to-set-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-by-a-spouse-is-not-rendered-infructuous-by-remarriage-of-opposite-spouse\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Application to set aside ex-parte divorce decree by a spouse is not rendered infructuous by remarriage of opposite spouse"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":291055,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/01\/no-distinction-in-contested-and-ex-parte-divorce-decree-under-hma-section-15-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":204457,"position":0},"title":"Section 15 of HMA does not make any distinction between a contested decree and an ex parte decree; Delhi High Court upholds second marriage of husband","author":"Arunima","date":"May 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that an ex parte decree of divorce also it shall be lawful for either party to the marriage to marry again if no appeal is filed against such decree within the period of limitation.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211647,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/08\/del-hc-wifes-application-for-setting-aside-ex-parte-divorce-decree-rejected-in-absence-of-application-for-condonation-of-more-than-4-years-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":204457,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Wife’s application for setting aside ex-parte divorce decree rejected in absence of application for condonation of more than 4 years’ delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of G.S. Sistani and Jyoti Singh, JJ., dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant-wife against the order of the family court rejecting her application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the ex-parte decree of divorce passed in favour of her husband. The parties\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":363225,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/10\/rajasthan-hc-unclaimed-notice-not-valid-service-ex-parte-divorce-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":204457,"position":2},"title":"Rajasthan HC holds notice returned ‘unclaimed’ not valid service; Sets aside ex-parte divorce decree","author":"Editor","date":"October 10, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA refusal for the purpose of service of notice should be taken to be a sufficient service, if such refusal is by the addressee or by the noticee himself\/herself.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Unclaimed Notice Not Valid Service","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Unclaimed-Notice-Not-Valid-Service.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Unclaimed-Notice-Not-Valid-Service.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Unclaimed-Notice-Not-Valid-Service.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Unclaimed-Notice-Not-Valid-Service.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324725,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/19\/gauhati-high-court-holds-bar-to-remarry-does-not-apply-on-application-for-condonation-of-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":204457,"position":3},"title":"Gauhati HC holds bar to remarriage not applicable in case of delay in filing appeal against divorce decree","author":"Editor","date":"June 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court holds statutory bar to remarry u\/s 15 HMA cannot be extended by filing application seeking condonation of delay to challenge the divorce decree.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Gauhati High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Gauhati-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":377436,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/05\/bom-hc-reliance-on-whatsapp-chats-alone-insufficient-to-grant-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":204457,"position":4},"title":"Reliance on WhatsApp chats alone insufficient to grant divorce on grounds of cruelty: Bombay HC","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"March 5, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cMerely relying on the WhatsApp chat, the divorce decree cannot be granted, since it is not proved by leading evidence.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"WhatsApp chats insufficient","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/WhatsApp-chats-insufficient.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/WhatsApp-chats-insufficient.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/WhatsApp-chats-insufficient.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/WhatsApp-chats-insufficient.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":100021,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/18\/desertion-as-ground-for-divorce-cannot-be-tested-by-merely-ascertaining-which-party-left-the-matrimonial-home-first\/","url_meta":{"origin":204457,"position":5},"title":"Desertion as ground for divorce cannot be tested by merely ascertaining which party left the matrimonial home first","author":"Saba","date":"January 18, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Delhi: While judging the legality and validity of the divorce decree granted to the husband respondent by the learned trial court, the Bench comprising of Pradeep Nandrajog and Yogesh Khanna, JJ., observed that since desertion is often invoked as ground of divorce however it cannot be tested\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204457"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204457\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}