{"id":204225,"date":"2018-10-26T17:00:31","date_gmt":"2018-10-26T11:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=204225"},"modified":"2018-10-30T12:33:40","modified_gmt":"2018-10-30T07:03:40","slug":"objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Objector claiming arms length distance from judgment-debtors can’t represent their interest; held “abuse of process of Court”: Delhi HC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: <\/strong>A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J., dismissed an execution first appeal filed against the order of Additional District Judge whereby appellants objection to the execution of a money decree sought by decree-holder against the judgment-debtor was dismissed.<\/p>\n

It was contended by the appellant-objector that she was the sole owner of the two properties attached in the execution and the judgment-debtor, her son, had no right over them. The Executing Court dismissed the objections of the appellant holding that in proof of her title to the said properties, the appellant filed only a Power of Attorney of her husband in her favour which wasn’t sufficient. Counsel for the appellant submitted that there was a family settlement, however, neither was any such settlement pleaded in the objections nor any document filed in that regard.<\/p>\n

The High Court was of the view that it appeared that the purpose was to delay the execution. The appellant and the judgment-debtors were hand-in-glove with each other and were not making a clean breast of state of affairs. In Court’s opinion, it was an attempt to fabricate the documents. Furthermore, one of the judgment-debtors had already left India. The court observed that appellant-objector could not on one hand claim arms length distance from judgment-debtors and on the other hand represent their interest. The appeal was held to be an abuse of process of Court and thus dismissed.[Charanjit Kaur Virk v. Premlata Sharma,2018 SCC OnLine Del 12020<\/b><\/a>, dated 15-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J., dismissed an execution first appeal filed against the order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31236,32237,20091,32238,32239],"class_list":["post-204225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abuse-of-process","tag-execution","tag-first-appeal","tag-judgment-debtors","tag-money-decree"],"yoast_head":"\nObjector claiming arms length distance from judgment-debtors can't represent their interest; held "abuse of process of Court": Delhi HC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Objector claiming arms length distance from judgment-debtors can't represent their interest; held "abuse of process of Court": Delhi HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J., dismissed an execution first appeal filed against the order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-26T11:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-30T07:03:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Objector claiming arms length distance from judgment-debtors can't represent their interest; held \\\"abuse of process of Court\\\": Delhi HC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-26T11:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-30T07:03:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Objector claiming arms length distance from judgment-debtors can’t represent their interest; held “abuse of process of Court”: Delhi HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Objector claiming arms length distance from judgment-debtors can't represent their interest; held \"abuse of process of Court\": Delhi HC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Objector claiming arms length distance from judgment-debtors can't represent their interest; held \"abuse of process of Court\": Delhi HC","og_description":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J., dismissed an execution first appeal filed against the order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-26T11:30:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-30T07:03:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/","name":"Objector claiming arms length distance from judgment-debtors can't represent their interest; held \"abuse of process of Court\": Delhi HC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-26T11:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-30T07:03:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/objector-claiming-arms-length-distance-from-judgment-debtors-cant-represent-their-interest-held-abuse-of-process-of-court-delhi-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Objector claiming arms length distance from judgment-debtors can’t represent their interest; held “abuse of process of Court”: Delhi HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":244477,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/27\/sale-confirmed-objections-of-judgment-debtor-overruled-can-consent-decree-be-set-aside-in-such-case-supreme-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":204225,"position":0},"title":"Sale confirmed; objections of judgment debtor overruled. Can consent decree be set aside in such case? Supreme Court answers","author":"Editor","date":"February 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench comprising of R. Subhash Reddy, M. R. Shah* and Ashok Bhushan, JJ., set aside the order of High Court of judicature at Karnataka holding that the Court had exceeded its jurisdiction while quashing the order. The Bench expressed, \u201cWhen the mortgaged property was sold in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372080,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/08\/delhi-hc-rejects-metas-claim-for-extra-damages-in-facebook-trade-mark-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":204225,"position":1},"title":"‘No willful disobedience or non-compliance’: Delhi HC rejects Meta’s claim for additional damages in Facebake v. Facebook trade mark case","author":"Prarthana Gupta","date":"January 8, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere judgment debtors have substantially complied with a permanent injunction and no prior notice of breach was issued, execution proceedings cannot be used to seek additional compensation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Facebook trade mark case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Facebook-trade-mark-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Facebook-trade-mark-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Facebook-trade-mark-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Facebook-trade-mark-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255568,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/14\/half-a-century-old-litigation-we-wish-it-is-the-knock-out-round-sc-holds-objections-cant-be-raised-in-instalments-res-judicata-applicable-on-execution-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":204225,"position":2},"title":"‘Half a century old litigation, we wish it is the knock out round!’ SC holds objections can\u2019t be raised in instalments; Res judicata applicable on execution proceedings","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"...the case on hand is fit to be included in the syllabus of a law school as a study material for students to get equipped with the various provisions of the Code relating to execution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300066,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/26\/executing-court-cannot-dismiss-execution-petition-possession-third-party-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":204225,"position":3},"title":"Executing Court cannot hold execution decree inexecutable, merely because decree-holder lost possession to an encroacher: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"August 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf this is allowed to happen, every judgment-debtor who is in possession of the immoveable property till the decree is passed, shall hand over possession to a third party to defeat the decree-holder's right and entitlement to enjoy the fruits of litigation and this may continue indefinitely and no decree\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"dismiss execution petition","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/dismiss-execution-petition.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/dismiss-execution-petition.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/dismiss-execution-petition.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/dismiss-execution-petition.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325420,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/01\/can-court-pass-orders-for-trademark-infringement-in-execution-petition-dhc-answers-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":204225,"position":4},"title":"Can the Court pass orders for trademark infringement in an execution petition? Delhi HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"July 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is immaterial if the term or directions in a decree is contrary to law. The Executing Court cannot go behind the same, and has to give effect to the decree.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":331561,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/23\/execution-court-application-s28-specific-relief-act-recission-contract-time-extention-jurisdiction-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":204225,"position":5},"title":"Whether Execution Court can decide application under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act for recission of contract\/ time extension? SC answers","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Dismissing the appeal, the Court opined that the respondents had all throughout shown their intention to pay the balance consideration for execution of the sale deed whereas the appellants appeared interested only in challenging the decree before higher Courts.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Execution Court Section 28 Specific Relief Act recission of contract","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Execution-Court-Section-28-Specific-Relief-Act-recission-of-contract.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Execution-Court-Section-28-Specific-Relief-Act-recission-of-contract.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Execution-Court-Section-28-Specific-Relief-Act-recission-of-contract.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Execution-Court-Section-28-Specific-Relief-Act-recission-of-contract.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}