{"id":204223,"date":"2018-10-26T13:00:47","date_gmt":"2018-10-26T07:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=204223"},"modified":"2018-10-31T12:45:56","modified_gmt":"2018-10-31T07:15:56","slug":"accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Accused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct: SC"},"content":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Bench comprising of A.M. Khanwilkar and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ., partly allowed a criminal appeal filed by murder convicts challenging the judgment of Allahabad High Court whereby the appellants were convicted under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.<\/p>\n

One Zahida Begum and her son were murdered. She was the second wife of Appellant 3. Appellants 1 and 2 were sons of Appellant 3 from his first wife. In January 2004, the police received the missing complaint of Zahida and her son. On enquiry, Appellant 1 confesses to murdering them along with the other two appellants and also assisted the police in recovery of the dead bodies form the septic tank at back of the house. All the three appellants lived together in the house from which the bodies were recovered. The appellants were charged, tried and convicted by the trial for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. On an appeal, the High Court upheld the conviction while modifying the punishment. Aggrieved thereby, present appeal was filed.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court, on perusal of the record, held that as far as Appellant 1 was concerned, no error could be found with the judgment of upholding conviction and order of sentence passed by the High Court against him. However, as for Appellants 2 and 3, the Court held that there was no such evidence as to prove the offence of murder against them beyond a reasonable doubt. It was reiterated that confession an accused, by itself cannot form the basis for conviction of the co-accused. Further, however, the Court held that the fact that they could not be convicted for offence punishable under Section 302does not extricate them from the offence under Section 201 for causing the disappearance of evidence. The Court said say so because it was proved that Zahida and her son were residing along with the appellants in the same house. It is also an established fact that they had suddenly gone missing for over two months. No efforts were made by Appellants 2 and 3 to trace them nor did they think it necessary to report that fact to the local police. No explanation whatsoever was offered as to why they did not report about the sudden disappearance. Even though they could not be made liable for the murder for want of legal evidence in that regard, they would certainly be guilty of having committed offence under Section 201 as established from proved circumstances coupled with their abject failure tooter any explanation, much less cogent explanation, about their conduct. The appeal was disposed in the terms above. [Asar Mohammad v. State of U.P.,2018 SCC OnLine SC 2179<\/b><\/a>, decided on 24-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Khanwilkar and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ., partly allowed a criminal appeal filed by murder convicts challenging <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt"],"yoast_head":"\nAccused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct: SC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Accused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct: SC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Khanwilkar and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ., partly allowed a criminal appeal filed by murder convicts challenging\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-26T07:30:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-31T07:15:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/\",\"name\":\"Accused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct: SC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-26T07:30:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-31T07:15:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Accused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct: SC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Accused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct: SC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Accused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct: SC","og_description":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Khanwilkar and L. Nageswara Rao, JJ., partly allowed a criminal appeal filed by murder convicts challenging","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-26T07:30:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-31T07:15:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/","name":"Accused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct: SC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2018-10-26T07:30:47+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-31T07:15:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/26\/accused-acquitted-of-offence-under-section-302-convicted-under-section-201-ipc-on-abject-failure-to-offer-any-explanation-about-their-conduct-sc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Accused acquitted of offence under Section 302 convicted under Section 201 IPC on abject failure to offer any explanation about their conduct: SC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":325056,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/bombay-hc-acquits-four-gang-members-convicted-of-murdering-and-attempting-to-murder-rival-gang-members\/","url_meta":{"origin":204223,"position":0},"title":"Bombay HC acquits four gang members convicted of murdering and attempting to murder rival gang members","author":"Editor","date":"June 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that the benefit of reasonable doubt shall be given to the appellants and therefore partly allowed both the appeals, by acquitting them under Section 302 of IPC, and releasing the incarcerated appellants sentenced under Section 307 of IPC, for having served the ordered sentence period.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/06\/no-conviction-u-s-364a-of-ipc-unless-abduction-is-coupled-with-ransom-demand-and-life-threat-chhattisgarh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":204223,"position":1},"title":"Conviction cannot be made u\/s 364A of IPC, unless abduction is coupled with ransom demand and life threat: Chhattisgarh HC sets aside conviction and sentence of accused","author":"Arushi","date":"July 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that this is not a case of ransom because the appellants had not called the complainant\u2019s wife to pay ransom, and it is possible that they were planning to receive the rest of the amount of the vehicle from \u2018X\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Chhattisgarh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Chhattisgarh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240584,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/12\/all-hc-court-should-not-be-too-technical-when-it-feels-convinced-about-trustworthiness-of-dying-declaration-which-inspires-confidence-can-be-acted-upon-without-any-corroboration\/","url_meta":{"origin":204223,"position":2},"title":"All HC | Court should not be too technical when it feels convinced about trustworthiness of dying declaration, which if inspires confidence, can be acted upon, without any corroboration","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0The Division Bench of B. Amit Sthalekar and Shekhar Kumar Yadav, JJ., held that dying declaration can be acted upon without any corroboration when the Court feels convinced about its trustworthiness. Appellants filed the instant criminal appeal against the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge whereby appellants have\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":206323,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/06\/absence-of-eye-witnesses-on-record-shall-be-weighed-above-circumstantial-evidence-presented-before-the-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":204223,"position":3},"title":"Absence of eye witnesses on record shall be weighed above circumstantial evidence presented before the Court","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ajay Kumar Tripathi and Vinod Kumar Sinha, JJ. declared that there were no reasons that added up to convict the accused. The appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with Sections 34 and 201 of the Penal Code, 1860 to undergo rigorous\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":275805,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/17\/not-planned-but-committed-in-sudden-spur-of-the-moment-bombay-high-court-reduces-father-brothers-li-to-10-years-ri-for-killing-girls-lover\/","url_meta":{"origin":204223,"position":4},"title":"‘Not planned but committed in sudden spur of the moment’; Bombay High Court reduces father-brother’s LI to 10 years RI for killing girl’s lover","author":"Editor","date":"October 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Bombay High Court : In an appeal filed questioning the legality of Judgment and convicting both Appellants i.e. a father and a son, under Section 235(2) of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) for offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 of Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentencing both\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6501,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/25\/husband-s-extra-marital-relationship-does-not-amount-to-cruelty\/","url_meta":{"origin":204223,"position":5},"title":"Husband\u2019s extra- marital relationship does not amount to cruelty","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 25, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the instant case, where the question arose that whether a husband\u2019s extra-marital affair amounts to cruelty under Section 498A of IPC, the Bench of Dipak Misra and S.J Mukhopadhayay, JJ., observed that\u00a0husband has developed some intimacy with another, during the subsistence of marriage and failed to discharge\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Supreme Court"","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204223\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}