{"id":204137,"date":"2018-10-24T12:30:46","date_gmt":"2018-10-24T07:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=204137"},"modified":"2018-10-26T15:38:25","modified_gmt":"2018-10-26T10:08:25","slug":"proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/","title":{"rendered":"Proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab<\/strong> and Haryana High Court:<\/strong> This revision petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Sudip Ahluwalia, J., against the order passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Division) where an application under Order 6 Rule 17 for amendment of original plaint was rejected.<\/p>\n

The facts of the case were that petitioner filed a suit for recovery of a certain amount given to respondent as a friendly loan. The petitioner alleged respondent of giving a post-dated check and before maturity of cheque dates, respondent died due to which petitioner had filed suit. The respondent defended the suit by stating that the deceased could not have given the cheque as the same was claimed to have been given during the time deceased was ill and later on 1st<\/sup> of February he died. Petitioner at this stage filed an application for an amendment to plaint where he wanted to change averments that the deceased had taken a loan and issued the cheques to him in the month of January 2014 instead of February. The application was dismissed by Trial Court on the ground that the aforementioned change not only set up an inconsistent suit but also reeks a mala fide intention.<\/p>\n

The High Court viewed that the dispute was related to the time and month in which the cheque was made and petitioner seeks to rectify this error in original pleadings so as to make it consistent with the facts and circumstances.\u00a0 It was found that the proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of the suit, therefore, the revision petition was allowed and impugned order was set aside. [Navjot Singh v. Satwinderpal Singh, 2018 SCC OnLine P&H 1570<\/b><\/a>, decided on 11-10-2018]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: This revision petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Sudip Ahluwalia, J., against the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[32201,32200,32202],"class_list":["post-204137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-order-6-rule-17-cpc","tag-proposed-amendment","tag-suit-of-recovery"],"yoast_head":"\nProposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This revision petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Sudip Ahluwalia, J., against the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-10-24T07:00:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-26T10:08:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/10\\\/24\\\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/10\\\/24\\\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-24T07:00:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-26T10:08:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/10\\\/24\\\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":296,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Order 6 Rule 17 CPC\",\"Proposed Amendment\",\"Suit of Recovery\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/10\\\/24\\\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/10\\\/24\\\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/10\\\/24\\\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\\\/\",\"name\":\"Proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-10-24T07:00:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-26T10:08:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/10\\\/24\\\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/10\\\/24\\\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2018\\\/10\\\/24\\\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: This revision petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Sudip Ahluwalia, J., against the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2018-10-24T07:00:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-26T10:08:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed","datePublished":"2018-10-24T07:00:46+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-26T10:08:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/"},"wordCount":296,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Order 6 Rule 17 CPC","Proposed Amendment","Suit of Recovery"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/","name":"Proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-10-24T07:00:46+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-26T10:08:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/proposed-amendment-does-not-change-the-nature-and-character-of-suit-application-under-order-6-rule-17-allowed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Proposed amendment does not change the nature and character of suit; application under Order 6 Rule 17 allowed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":200644,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/26\/application-under-order-vi-rule-17-cpc-cannot-be-allowed-to-convert-title-of-a-suit-filed-by-private-individual-to-private-limited-company\/","url_meta":{"origin":204137,"position":0},"title":"Application under Or 6 R 17 CPC cannot be allowed to convert title of suit filed by an individual to one by private limited company","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anu Malhotra, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby plaintiff's application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC was rejected. The petitioner had instituted a suit for recovery of Rs 25 lakhs along with pendente lite\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":237734,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/20\/p-court-allows-revision-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":204137,"position":1},"title":"P&H HC | Pending application under Or. 6 R. 17 CPC ought to have been decided prior to the decision in the application under Or. 7 R. 11 CPC; Court allows revision petition","author":"Editor","date":"October 20, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: In a revision petition challenging an order passed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC; Raj Mohan Singh, J., allowed the petition while setting the order aside. The present petition arises from the order dated 07-03-2020 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sirsa, vide\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213661,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/18\/raj-hc-no-material-change-reflected-in-the-pleadings-thus-petitioner-barred-to-contend-re-framing-of-issues\/","url_meta":{"origin":204137,"position":2},"title":"Raj HC | No material change reflected in the pleadings, thus petitioner barred to contend re framing of issues","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Bench of Dr Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J., dismissed the petition filed for mainly amendment of the issues framed in the pleadings at a later stage. The facts of the case were that the respondent-landlord had filed an application under Section 18(2) of the Rajasthan Rent Control\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241304,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/25\/ker-hc-proviso-to-or-vi-r-17-of-code-curtails-absolute-discretion-of-court-to-allow-amendment-at-any-stage-of-suit-it-has-to-be-shown-that-in-spite-of-due-diligence-such-amendment-could-not-have\/","url_meta":{"origin":204137,"position":3},"title":"Ker HC | Proviso to Or. VI R. 17 of Code curtails absolute discretion of Court to allow amendment at any stage of suit, it has to be shown that in spite of due diligence, such amendment could not have been sought earlier; legal position reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"December 25, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: R. Narayana Pisharadi, J., while allowing the instant petition, set aside the order of trial Court, thereby allowing the amendment of the plaint contrary to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure. In the present case, respondent instituted a suit before trial Court for obtaining a decree\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/04\/day-on-which-money-was-transferred-to-be-excluded-while-computing-period-of-limitation-for-filing-recovery-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":204137,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Day on which money was transferred to be excluded while computing period of limitation for filing recovery proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of Vinod Goel, J. dismissed a petition against the order of District and Sessions Judge, Rohin Courts whereby he has dismissed petitioner's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The petitioner was the defendant in a suit for recovery filed by the respondent.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":254627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/23\/a-case-of-wanton-negligence-and-callousness-of-petitioner\/","url_meta":{"origin":204137,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | A case of wanton negligence and callousness of petitioner; HC rejects application for amendment making inconsistent and alternative pleadings in written statement","author":"Editor","date":"September 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: V.G.Arun, J., held that no amendment can be allowed in written statement where it seeks to change former admissions.\u00a0 The Bench stated, \u00a0\u201cEven the most liberal approach towards amendment of written statements will not justify the approval of such an application.\u201d Background The petitioner was the defendant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}